SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Fauteuil - DG

Consider they get Hughes

Created by: VinceFB44
Team: 2019-20 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 20, 2019
Published: Mar. 20, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,500,000
3$4,000,000
8$9,000,000
5$3,250,000
2$925,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$9,000,000
2$850,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Hughes, Jack
3$925,000
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the COL
2021
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2022
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,000,000$73,918,928$0$1,032,500$7,081,072
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
Landeskog, Gabriel
$5,571,429$5,571,429
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
MacKinnon, Nathan
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
Rantanen, Mikko
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 6
Skinner, Jeff
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
Söderberg, Carl
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
Compher, J.T.
$3,250,000$3,250,000
C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
Kerfoot, Alexander
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 4
Hughes, Jack
$925,000$925,000
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
Jost, Tyson
$885,833$885,833 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
Nieto, Matt
$1,975,000$1,975,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
Calvert, Matt
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
Kamenev, Vladislav
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
Girard, Samuel
$728,333$728,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
Johnson, Erik
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
Grubauer, Philipp
$3,333,333$3,333,333
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
Cole, Ian
$3,450,000$3,450,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
Barrie, Tyson
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
Cannata, Joe
$850,000$850,000
G
UFA
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
Zadorov, Nikita
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
Barberio, Mark
$1,450,000$1,450,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
Timmins, Conor
$925,000$925,000
RD
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 20, 2019 at 9:00 a.m.
#1
Ryminister_27
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 1,915
Or consider they take Kakko #1 instead cause he's better and fits their system better
Mar. 20, 2019 at 10:11 a.m.
#2
coga16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: jonesryan
Or consider they take Kakko #1 instead cause he's better and fits their system better


I agree with you that yes Kakko would be probably the smarter selection as he would be easier to plug into that top 6 due to lack of pure wingers. But you dont pass on Hughes if you are drafting 1
Mar. 20, 2019 at 10:12 a.m.
#3
Ryminister_27
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 1,915
Quoting: coga16
I agree with you that yes Kakko would be probably the smarter selection as he would be easier to plug into that top 6 due to lack of pure wingers. But you dont pass on Hughes if you are drafting 1


Isn't the point of picking #1 overall to pick the beat player? ... Kakko > Hughes
Mar. 20, 2019 at 10:15 a.m.
#4
coga16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: jonesryan
Isn't the point of picking #1 overall to pick the beat player? ... Kakko > Hughes


Hughes is the better player though. Kakko is really good but Hughes still tops him. What he has done to date, compared to other players who have came through that system, such as Kane, Matthews, etc He could be the best player to ever be developed by the USNTDP. The hype is real and no way you pass up on him at 1st overall
UpsideDownQue liked this.
Mar. 20, 2019 at 10:25 a.m.
#5
Ryminister_27
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 1,915
Edited Mar. 20, 2019 at 10:32 a.m.
Quoting: coga16
Hughes is the better player though. Kakko is really good but Hughes still tops him. What he has done to date, compared to other players who have came through that system, such as Kane, Matthews, etc He could be the best player to ever be developed by the USNTDP. The hype is real and no way you pass up on him at 1st overall


You only hear all the hype and more about Hughes cause he plays in North America.

Edit: sorry pushed the wrong button too early.. but Kakko plays against men already and is lighting it up. He's breaking records in the Finnish Elite League. There's a reason why he's compared to Matthews. Hughes is playing against teenagers. He should be tearing it up against them. Kakko is a far more complete player. He can play a skill game, or a power game, he's reliable defensively, and he uses his teammates well. Hughes is just more offensively creative. Kakko is better and should go #1 to any team picking
Mar. 20, 2019 at 10:52 a.m.
#6
coga16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: jonesryan
You only hear all the hype and more about Hughes cause he plays in North America.

Edit: sorry pushed the wrong button too early.. but Kakko plays against men already and is lighting it up. He's breaking records in the Finnish Elite League. There's a reason why he's compared to Matthews. Hughes is playing against teenagers. He should be tearing it up against them. Kakko is a far more complete player. He can play a skill game, or a power game, he's reliable defensively, and he uses his teammates well. Hughes is just more offensively creative. Kakko is better and should go #1 to any team picking


Agree to disagree
Mar. 20, 2019 at 11:01 a.m.
#7
Ryminister_27
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 1,915
Quoting: coga16
Agree to disagree


I disagree to that wink
Mar. 20, 2019 at 11:42 a.m.
#8
franky_22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 241
Likes: 21
Quoting: coga16
I agree with you that yes Kakko would be probably the smarter selection as he would be easier to plug into that top 6 due to lack of pure wingers. But you dont pass on Hughes if you are drafting 1



It's still tighter than we think between Hugues and Kakko. Let's say COL win the lotto. They must play the joker and let believe that they are undecided, that they really like both. And good chances that the team holding the #2 makes you a good offer to reverse the pick. Suppose that #2 team is LA Kings and they absolutely want Jack Hugues, you could manage to get maybe an Adrian Kempe in addition of Kakko... It's an option to consider if they win the lotto IMO.
Mar. 20, 2019 at 11:56 a.m.
#9
coga16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: franky_22
It's still tighter than we think between Hugues and Kakko. Let's say COL win the lotto. They must play the joker and let believe that they are undecided, that they really like both. And good chances that the team holding the #2 makes you a good offer to reverse the pick. Suppose that #2 team is LA Kings and they absolutely want Jack Hugues, you could manage to get maybe an Adrian Kempe in addition of Kakko... It's an option to consider if they win the lotto IMO.


I dont see any teams doing that to be honest. Trading the 1st overall pick hasnt happened in years...the last time was 2003. Its just an unprecedented trade now a days that fans lust over some mega ransom for...teams wont ever pay that price so in all reality the pick stays where its at
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll