Not for Kapanen or Edmonton. The rest is okay

Is it the Term or the Salary for Kappy?

As for Edmonton, what makes it fair?
I think paying 2.1 for Brown who can stay in the Lineup beats 1M for Pool Party

2x3.85 seems right for Kapanen.

Edmonton doesn’t want to do it for the exact reason you want to do it. Puljujärvi is 20. He’s got a lot of potential.

Yeah, the Calgary trade actually looks pretty good, I just can't see Andersson getting moved. As for the Kapanen vs. Johnsson contract debate, I've always believed Johnsson could make significantly more than Kapanen, as he's better, more developed and has arbitration rights. But just my opinions

0% chance leafs trade for neal from flames. And that jenner trade is too much for leafs to give up IMO

At his cost and who else they get in that trade, I think it's worth it. Paired with the right players, Neal can rebound.

As for Jenner. We'll this is what I think it would take to pry him from the Jackets. And personally, I think it's only slightly over paying for what he brings to the table.

Both the Calgary and the Columbus trade are pretty bad.

For who?

Leafs.

Don't think they give up on Nylander after he had the odds against him all season. Give him until the trade deadline to produce, if he doesn't don't wait longer than that. Andersson projects to a top 4 D, but it's not worth sacrficing Nylander to get an old Neal on a brutal contract, and losing a pick and Rosen (who should crack Top 6 next year).

Jenner is alright, but people forget what Kadri brings to the team, especially after he was a bozo in the playoffs. Kadri and Jenner are actually pretty similar IMO. Kadri produces more consistently but doesn't have the same magnitude of physical play that Jenner brings. The difference between Kadri and Jenner isn't a 3rd, 4th, and Sparks though...

If you're sold on the idea of trading Nylander now (and I'm not), then a simple Nylander-for-Andersson-and-Ruzicka deal should suffice. The other elements are just extraneous confusion.