SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

now that we know the cap

Created by: RyanBruins17
Team: 2019-20 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 24, 2019
Published: Jun. 24, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,000,000
2$2,500,000
7$7,500,000
Trades
BOS
  1. Kreider, Chris
  2. 2020 7th round pick (NSH)
NYR
  1. Backes, David
  2. Lauzon, Jérémy
  3. 2020 2nd round pick (BOS)
  4. 2021 4th round pick (BOS)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the NSH
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$81,246,667$0$2,432,500$253,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$4,625,000$4,625,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$450,000$450K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,200,000$3,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,500,000$7,500,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000 (Performance Bonus$1,750,000$2M)
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 4

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 24, 2019 at 12:35 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,884
Likes: 8,875
Edited Jun. 24, 2019 at 12:45 p.m.
Rangers thank you for the prank call. Laugh, hang up.

Lauzon, 2nd, 4th does not begin to touch Kreider, having to take Backes is a penalty on top of that.

On top of which, Kreider is not the piece they need. Don’t need another LW. Need a RW. Debrusk was highly ineffective playing RW. This is square peg round hole crap that they have been doing since Backes failed to be the RW2 they brought him to be.
bcasbruins liked this.
Jun. 24, 2019 at 12:39 p.m.
#2
Official Leafs Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 971
Likes: 253
Lauzon, 2nd and a 4th is barely enough to dump backes let alone get Kreider
Edit* it’s actually not even enough to dump Backes, I thought he only had one year, two years is gonna cost even more
Jun. 24, 2019 at 12:40 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Ryan Balter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posts: 8
Likes: 1
A different defense prospect or an upgrade in picks would be fine. Rangers can easily take the Backes contract, and could use his leadership in their room.
Ngp2 liked this.
Jun. 24, 2019 at 12:45 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 672
Quoting: RyanBruins17
A different defense prospect or an upgrade in picks would be fine. Rangers can easily take the Backes contract, and could use his leadership in their room.


Rangers want no part of Backes. It would require a similar package to what Toronto gave up to get rid of Marleau (arguably more due to the extra year on his contract).
Gofnut999 liked this.
Jun. 24, 2019 at 12:51 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 877
Quoting: RyanBruins17
A different defense prospect or an upgrade in picks would be fine. Rangers can easily take the Backes contract, and could use his leadership in their room.


Great leadership from the luxury suites in Game 7.

We already have Staal and his $5.7M contract for "veteran leadership ". Don't need any more.
Gofnut999 liked this.
Jun. 24, 2019 at 12:53 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
The Rangers are in no position to take on his salary. They are trying to rebuild and Trouba will take a large portion of their 17m - Pretty sure they want to take a run at Panarin as well, and if they give 10 to panarin and 7 to trouba that = no money left.
Jun. 24, 2019 at 12:54 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,884
Likes: 8,875
Quoting: Hackadart
Lauzon, 2nd and a 4th is barely enough to dump backes let alone get Kreider
Edit* it’s actually not even enough to dump Backes, I thought he only had one year, two years is gonna cost even more


Actually he is better dump than Marleau. After July 1st has actual salary for the year is 1m and is a cheap buyout next year. Canes will be on the hook for all of Marleau's cap hit this year, even if they buy him out.

But ya remove Kreider and that kind of package would be to move Backes. But not likely the Rangers,
Ngp2 liked this.
Jun. 24, 2019 at 1:25 p.m.
#8
Official Leafs Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 971
Likes: 253
Quoting: Gofnut999
Actually he is better dump than Marleau. After July 1st has actual salary for the year is 1m and is a cheap buyout next year. Canes will be on the hook for all of Marleau's cap hit this year, even if they buy him out.

But ya remove Kreider and that kind of package would be to move Backes. But not likely the Rangers,


He would definitely cost more than Marleau... He is owed $8mil Marleau owed 3.something, Marleau 1 year $6.25 buyout or not, Backes if bought out now will be 5.6,3.6,.6,.6... way worse, and if they don’t buy him out till next year it’s one year of 6 then 4,1 also way worse than 1 year of 6.25
Jun. 24, 2019 at 1:35 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,884
Likes: 8,875
Quoting: Hackadart
He would definitely cost more than Marleau... He is owed $8mil Marleau owed 3.something, Marleau 1 year $6.25 buyout or not, Backes if bought out now will be 5.6,3.6,.6,.6... way worse, and if they don’t buy him out till next year it’s one year of 6 then 4,1 also way worse than 1 year of 6.25


Look again. After July 1st he only owed 5m over the next 2 years. 1m in actual salary this year. And the buyout next year is very reasonable. You are stuck with him this year however.
Ngp2 liked this.
Jun. 24, 2019 at 1:52 p.m.
#10
Official Leafs Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 971
Likes: 253
Quoting: Gofnut999
Look again. After July 1st he only owed 5m over the next 2 years. 1m in actual salary this year. And the buyout next year is very reasonable. You are stuck with him this year however.


Ok so if trade is after July first then yeah it’s 5 mill which is still more than Marleau, and then it would have to be the full 6 mil this year so almost as much caphit as Marleau this year plus another 4 mil next year and 1 after that.... which is waaay worse than just the one year with Marleau, it’s gonna cost more than the Marleau dump cost
Jun. 24, 2019 at 3:13 p.m.
#11
NGP22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 521
Likes: 78
Quoting: Hackadart
Ok so if trade is after July first then yeah it’s 5 mill which is still more than Marleau, and then it would have to be the full 6 mil this year so almost as much caphit as Marleau this year plus another 4 mil next year and 1 after that.... which is waaay worse than just the one year with Marleau, it’s gonna cost more than the Marleau dump cost


It's not the full 6, it's 5 over two years so way less than Marleau. Marleau also had a NMC, the price for dumping Backes will be less than Marleau.
Jun. 24, 2019 at 6:03 p.m.
#12
Official Leafs Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 971
Likes: 253
Quoting: Ngp2
It's not the full 6, it's 5 over two years so way less than Marleau. Marleau also had a NMC, the price for dumping Backes will be less than Marleau.


As I said if they get him after July 1 he is owed $5mil and Caphit is 6 mil this year then buyout next year comes to $4 mil and then $1 mil cap hits... other option is to trade before July1st and he will be owed $8 mil and the buyout can happen right away for cap hits of $5.6, $3.6, .6, .6... not that complicated to see that both of these option are worse than 1 year $4.25 mil owed and $6.25 mil caphit
Jun. 24, 2019 at 8:32 p.m.
#13
NGP22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 521
Likes: 78
Quoting: Hackadart
As I said if they get him after July 1 he is owed $5mil and Caphit is 6 mil this year then buyout next year comes to $4 mil and then $1 mil cap hits... other option is to trade before July1st and he will be owed $8 mil and the buyout can happen right away for cap hits of $5.6, $3.6, .6, .6... not that complicated to see that both of these option are worse than 1 year $4.25 mil owed and $6.25 mil caphit


He’s owed 1M this year, easy for a cap floor team to take on, he’ll go for less than Marleau
Jun. 24, 2019 at 10:30 p.m.
#14
Official Leafs Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 971
Likes: 253
Quoting: Ngp2
He’s owed 1M this year, easy for a cap floor team to take on, he’ll go for less than Marleau


Holy how many times will I have to say this... currently he is owed $8M which is $3.75M more than Marleau, if the trade is after July 1 then he will be owed $5M which again is MORE THAN MARLEAU, and the acquiring team will be stuck with his full $6M cap hit this year plus the buyout for the next 2 years after
Jun. 25, 2019 at 6:48 a.m.
#15
NGP22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 521
Likes: 78
Quoting: Hackadart
Holy how many times will I have to say this... currently he is owed $8M which is $3.75M more than Marleau, if the trade is after July 1 then he will be owed $5M which again is MORE THAN MARLEAU, and the acquiring team will be stuck with his full $6M cap hit this year plus the buyout for the next 2 years after


How many times should I say that 2.5M salary (less than Marleau) on a 6M cap hit is a good thing for a floor team? Have a good one.
Jun. 25, 2019 at 6:59 a.m.
#16
Official Leafs Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 971
Likes: 253
Quoting: Ngp2
How many times should I say that 2.5M salary (less than Marleau) on a 6M cap hit is a good thing for a floor team? Have a good one.


Where are you getting that #? 2.5 less than Marleau would be 1.75... so where does it say he only owed 1.75? Cause capfriendly says he is owed 8 so explain
Jun. 25, 2019 at 8:59 a.m.
#17
NGP22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 521
Likes: 78
Quoting: Hackadart
Where are you getting that #? 2.5 less than Marleau would be 1.75... so where does it say he only owed 1.75? Cause capfriendly says he is owed 8 so explain


He is paid a 3M bonus on 7/1. After that it's 5M over TWO years or 2.5M per year on a 6M cap hit while Marleau was 4.25 on a 6.25 cap hit with an NMC. That's a worse asset for a cap floor team.
Jun. 25, 2019 at 9:18 a.m.
#18
Official Leafs Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 971
Likes: 253
Quoting: Ngp2
He is paid a 3M bonus on 7/1. After that it's 5M over TWO years or 2.5M per year on a 6M cap hit while Marleau was 4.25 on a 6.25 cap hit with an NMC. That's a worse asset for a cap floor team.


There aren’t any teams right now that want a $6M caphit though, he would be bought out and his caphit would be a burden to any team in the league, $5M vs. $4.25M is all that a team with a lower budget cares about, and the 2 years of $6M caphit is worse than 1 year, NO TEAM WANTS YOU DEAD CAP
Jun. 25, 2019 at 9:32 a.m.
#19
NGP22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 521
Likes: 78
Quoting: Hackadart
There aren’t any teams right now that want a $6M caphit though, he would be bought out and his caphit would be a burden to any team in the league, $5M vs. $4.25M is all that a team with a lower budget cares about, and the 2 years of $6M caphit is worse than 1 year, NO TEAM WANTS YOU DEAD CAP


Plenty of teams need to get to the cap floor over the next two years and would want a player who's real money <50% of his cap hit. 5 vs. 4.25 doesn't matter since the 5 is spread out over two years. and you get the cap hit for both years.
Jun. 25, 2019 at 10:06 a.m.
#20
Official Leafs Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 971
Likes: 253
Quoting: Ngp2
Plenty of teams need to get to the cap floor over the next two years and would want a player who's real money <50% of his cap hit. 5 vs. 4.25 doesn't matter since the 5 is spread out over two years. and you get the cap hit for both years.


“Plenty of teams” Name them and I’ll tell u why ur wrong
Jun. 25, 2019 at 10:53 a.m.
#21
NGP22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 521
Likes: 78
Quoting: Hackadart
“Plenty of teams” Name them and I’ll tell u why ur wrong


Just glad we agree that Backes makes less real money than Marleau smile

Any team trying to get to the cap floor, Ottawa's the obvious one given how cheap Melnyk is.
Jun. 25, 2019 at 12:41 p.m.
#22
Official Leafs Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 971
Likes: 253
Quoting: Ngp2
Just glad we agree that Backes makes less real money than Marleau smile

Any team trying to get to the cap floor, Ottawa's the obvious one given how cheap Melnyk is.


Cause 8 mil is less than 4.25 or after July 1 5 mill also less than 4.25, no one is gonna take ur garbage ✌️
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll