Just think he's overrated, have never understood all the hype around him, can't remember which playoffs it was with the Hawks but they went on and on about him, he's speedy but lacks finish, but that's just my opinion.
An underrated player that should be on this list is Backstrom, one of the most forgotten about players in the league yet he's very very good.
The fact that he’s one dimensional makes him overrated. And his offense is not that impressive either. Solid but great enough to cover his deficiencies to propel him to the status he is given.
He's not one dimensional. He's good both ways. The Canes just had more guys that more fit a penalty kill. It would be a waste to use him for it, and its basically the same as not playing someone like Ovechkin, Kane, etc. on the PK, it just doesn't make sense unless you're really going for a SH goal.
Just think he's overrated, have never understood all the hype around him, can't remember which playoffs it was with the Hawks but they went on and on about him, he's speedy but lacks finish, but that's just my opinion.
An underrated player that should be on this list is Backstrom, one of the most forgotten about players in the league yet he's very very good.
Very good in transition and drives play well. 46.36 xGF%, 1.47 P1/60, 5.28 CF/60, while moving between the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th lines. One of the most crucial players for the Hawks and our best defensive forward
He's not one dimensional. He's good both ways. The Canes just had more guys that more fit a penalty kill. It would be a waste to use him for it, and its basically the same as not playing someone like Ovechkin, Kane, etc. on the PK, it just doesn't make sense unless you're really going for a SH goal.
Lol, he has always been weak defensively. Hell Faulk is weak defensively and they use him on the PK because Hamilton is so bad. ?
Gallagher is a top 10 RW. One of the best two-ways in the league plus 1.8 P1/60, 0.28 xGF/60, 7.76 CF/60.
Manson's zone defense is nutty. 2016-19: 19.8 evGAR, -0.019 xGA/60
I suspect you are using different stats then I'm used to. I don't particularly care what someone's Corsi for is without knowing their Corsi against. As well I'd like to know their relative rates. I also know what his scoring is, which is you know a huge part of the job of forwards.
I suspect you are using different stats then I'm used to. I don't particularly care what someone's Corsi for is without knowing their Corsi against. As well I'd like to know their relative rates. I also know what his scoring is, which is you know a huge part of the job of forwards.