Holl>Gudas... and cheaper.

No. You're wrong again old man

Maybe they're right or wrong but Holl is def cheaper than Gudas

Also no reason to sign Gudas when there's Sandin/Liljegren

A) He's wrong. In a 3 year sample, Gudas blows Holl out the water
B) Sandin is LHD, Liljegren probably won't be as good as many think. Leafs need to win within the next 2 years, can't really wait for Liljegren to develop

Yes you and your patented 3 year sample on a player that only has 46 games... you sound ridiculous.

You can't really blow a guy out of the water who didn't play.

A) Holl has been a relevation this season, he's a better skater than Gudas, a better puck handler and can actually move the puck up the ice. Holl is worth more to TO than Gudas.

B) Sandin is already ready to be an NHLer and I think Liljegren is probably already better than Ceci. Both are high end defensive prospects.

This guy is dense... already argued with me in a different thread how miller and tvr are better than Barrie and ceci.

Oh yeah I know. I ignored him for a long while. He's one of those guys that says he's unbiased but every player with a Leaf on his jersey is trash.

Holl is what he is. A good bottom pair option, you can't rely on him for top 4 minutes, that's why Gudas is better for Toronto.

Sandin is good no doubt, but he's not RHD. Liljegren, I don't think will be as good as people think he will be.

I'm dense because I challenged your common assumption. Great logic.

Show me a single thread of data to show Barrie and Ceci > Miller and TvR. Please try.

The last time I asked, you ran away like the little b*tch you are.

You say that as if a sample out of 30 games this year is better.