Your paying Wisniewski 4.8 million and you think you should be the GM now I've seen everything...

Okay what do you think he's going for? He's 2 years removed from a 50 point season. Plus it's only for one season. Your GM signed Radulov for 500k more on the same deal. If we have the cap room, it's low risk high reward

I can't believe you made a trade for Hartnell. The guy is overpaid and hes steadily declined since getting that extension. Murray would need to be a #1 dman for that to not be brutal. Also the Wizz is worth less than half of what you offered. He's a 2M type player at this point.

Hartnell has steadily declined? Take a peak at his stats man. He put up his 3rd consecutive 50 point, 100 PIM season, all while being put in a position to fail by john tortorella. And if wisniewski was a 2million type player, he would have signed by now. Besides, as I said in the previous comment, it's a 1 year deal. Have a clue of what your talking about before you rip apart somebodys proposal

Mr bruinsforthewin will rip any proposal involving Hartnell. He obviously doesn't look at stats or pay attention to actual play on the ice. He would rather just bash Hartsy until the cows come home. It is just as well. Odds are he has another strong year on the 3rd line with Wennberg &Anderson.

PS, as for Wiz, from experience watching him in Columbus, he is high risk/return in a nightly basis. He put up points but would give up plays defensively quite regularly. He will probably sign around $2.5-$3M. Although your deal is only 1 yr, Wiz had a season ending knee injury 47 sec into game 1 last year. Wondering how he will respond.

Are you forgetting he was just bought out of his contract and and like bill said season ending knee injury, id be looking around 2 million to sign him. that 50 point season was 2 years ago before the buyout and injury. High risk, but i wouldn't say high reward

Hartnell scored 37 goals when he signed his extension. His high since then is 28. You need to restudy your stats bro, unless you're some kind of deunce you should know 49 does not equal 50+. A player 34 years old being paid 4.75M should score 60 points in my book. He's not getting better and he's likely to decline. If you think you're getting 37 or even 30 goal Hartnell you're in denial of his age and his downward trend. Trading for a player is like buying stock. Do you put your money into things that have no room to improve and a realistic chance to decline? If so you're beyond the point of being helped. If Hartnell played a skill game and didn't have so many miles, or was on a 1 year contract he'd have good value, maybe a 1st at the deadline. People say Lucic will burn out by the end of his deal, but I think Hartnell is the same type of guy who also came to the NHL at an early age. Nobody thought Mike Richards would fall off so fast and be crap now, but it happens a lot to players who aren't stars. If you gave me the choice of Eric Staal for 1x4M as a UFA or 3 years of Hartnell at 4.75M I'd tak Staal all the way to the bank.