SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Krug Walks

Created by: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Team: 2020-21 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 16, 2020
Published: Jun. 16, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$3,750,000
2$2,750,000
2$1,250,000
1$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,000,000
Trades
1.
TBL
  1. Ritchie, Nick ($748,925 retained)
  2. Ritchie, Brett
  3. Studnicka, Jack
  4. 2020 2nd round pick (BOS)
2.
ANA
  1. Beecher, John [Reserve List]
  2. 2021 1st round pick (BOS)
  3. 2021 2nd round pick (BOS)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$80,417,953$964,222$1,250,000$1,082,047
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$4,450,000$4,450,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,850,000$2,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,250,000$2,250,000 (Performance Bonus$1,250,000$1M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Is this team a cup contender?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Jun. 16, 2020 at 1:44 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 389
Ducks decline. We don’t need more LW.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 1:56 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 10,354
Likes: 3,992
Bruins fans will hate you here.

They treat Studnicka like the second coming of Jesus.


This trade is definitely a severe overpay for Killorn. 2 2nds should do the trick.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 2:07 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
Quoting: Wqrrior
Bruins fans will hate you here.

They treat Studnicka like the second coming of Jesus.


This trade is definitely a severe overpay for Killorn. 2 2nds should do the trick.


The Bruins' 2nds are basically 3rds.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 2:09 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
Quoting: Arlotti47
Ducks decline. We don’t need more LW.


Okay... this offer doesn't have any LW... you can draft any position you want.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 3:29 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
I think the Tampa trade is a little too much but people love to undervalue Killorn on this site so I won’t call you out for it. I don’t think Grzylyk gets that amount either.

As for your question, I think this team is certainly a contender. The left side D would be really shaky, but Boston plays a very structured, team D oriented game, that even though on paper the D looks weak, it could still get it done. Especially with that crazy amount of forward depth. I still think if Boston loses krug they’d be better looking for a replacement rather than adding both Killorn AND Rakell. You kinda overpowered the forwards and left the left side D out to dry lol
bhavikp27 liked this.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 6:43 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,507
Likes: 4,566
Quoting: Wqrrior
Bruins fans will hate you here.

They treat Studnicka like the second coming of Jesus.


This trade is definitely a severe overpay for Killorn. 2 2nds should do the trick.


No we don't. We just lack young centers and he's our best one. With Krejci/Bergeron getting older we have a hard time trading him unless we're getting another young center back.
bhavikp27 liked this.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 6:44 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,507
Likes: 4,566
Quoting: Arlotti47
Ducks decline. We don’t need more LW.


Beecher is a center
bhavikp27 liked this.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 6:49 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,583
Likes: 5,455
Quoting: Wqrrior
Bruins fans will hate you here.

They treat Studnicka like the second coming of Jesus.


Well, as a contender, we don't have 4-5 prospects like him, so it's normal we want to keep him. Especially with 46/37 getting old.
And easy to say when you have been mediocre/bad for the past 5/6 past years and had time to draft 34 players (9 top5 picks in 1st/2nd/3rd rounds)

So cancel the Studnicka (and Beecher) trades, they aren't available for trade.

Quoting: Arlotti47
Ducks decline. We don’t need more LW.


Unless the trade was edited, Beecher is C, but can play LW I believe. Anyways, he's not available for trade.

Definitely not helping TBL with their cap problems. (And giving up Studnicka)
Don't need Rakell (and it costs a lot).
Correct deal for Grzelcyk. Bjork and Chara also. DeBrusk as well, although he could get a bit more ($).
Jun. 16, 2020 at 7:45 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,507
Likes: 4,566
Quoting: bhavikp27
Well, as a contender, we don't have 4-5 prospects like him, so it's normal we want to keep him. Especially with 46/37 getting old.
And easy to say when you have been mediocre/bad for the past 5/6 past years and had time to draft 34 players (9 top5 picks in 1st/2nd/3rd rounds)

So cancel the Studnicka (and Beecher) trades, they aren't available for trade.



Unless the trade was edited, Beecher is C, but can play LW I believe. Anyways, he's not available for trade.

Definitely not helping TBL with their cap problems. (And giving up Studnicka)
Don't need Rakell (and it costs a lot).
Correct deal for Grzelcyk. Bjork and Chara also. DeBrusk as well, although he could get a bit more ($).


I like Beecher's upside, but I'd trade him in the right deal for a Top 6 RW. In the future you'd still have Studnicka, Coyle, Frederic, Wagner, Shen, Steen, Hughes, Hall and JFK (if he returns). Assuming that Coyle/Studnicka make up the top 6 centers, you're looking for a few bottom 6 guys and Frederic, Hughes, Hall or JFK could fill those spots.
bhavikp27 liked this.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 7:50 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,583
Likes: 5,455
Quoting: ON3M4N
I like Beecher's upside, but I'd trade him in the right deal for a Top 6 RW. In the future you'd still have Studnicka, Coyle, Frederic, Wagner, Shen, Steen, Hughes, Hall and JFK (if he returns). Assuming that Coyle/Studnicka make up the top 6 centers, you're looking for a few bottom 6 guys and Frederic, Hughes, Hall or JFK could fill those spots.


Never know and all guys after Coyle will likely become bottom-6/4th line C with more of a checking game. Would like to have a 3C who can put up some pts as well, that's why I want to keep Beecher.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 8:11 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,507
Likes: 4,566
Quoting: bhavikp27
Never know and all guys after Coyle will likely become bottom-6/4th line C with more of a checking game. Would like to have a 3C who can put up some pts as well, that's why I want to keep Beecher.


I think Frederic could be that guy. Coyle right now puts up 35-40 points a year as our #3C and I think Frederic could manage that. Hall and JFK are probably the best shots at other #3C's for the Bruins, with Steen being a bit of a sleeper (though he plays more RW). Wagner, Shen and Hughes could all fill a 4th line role and we haven't even talked about players we could draft. This year I personally like Dylan Peterson out of the USDP. Was considered a 1st rounder at one point, but the production was there this year (some of that was just bad luck). He projects as a late 2nd/early 3rd. Big kid at 6'4 with decent wheels for his size, heavy shot, good in tight spaces and solid stick handler. He's committed to BU in the fall and would be right in Boston's backyard.
bhavikp27 liked this.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 9:51 a.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Wow
yeah bruins reject both of those deals

Not even close
CatmanV liked this.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 9:52 a.m.
#13
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Wqrrior
Bruins fans will hate you here.

They treat Studnicka like the second coming of Jesus.


This trade is definitely a severe overpay for Killorn. 2 2nds should do the trick.


Its not about that. Studnicka is a solid top 6 Center prospect. Like Cirelli was (until this year) or like Brett Howden (but Stud it better)...

Its just a bad trade
CatmanV liked this.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 9:54 a.m.
#14
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Wqrrior
Bruins fans will hate you here.

They treat Studnicka like the second coming of Jesus.


This trade is definitely a severe overpay for Killorn. 2 2nds should do the trick.


Quoting: mhockey91
I think the Tampa trade is a little too much but people love to undervalue Killorn on this site so I won’t call you out for it. I don’t think Grzylyk gets that amount either.

As for your question, I think this team is certainly a contender. The left side D would be really shaky, but Boston plays a very structured, team D oriented game, that even though on paper the D looks weak, it could still get it done. Especially with that crazy amount of forward depth. I still think if Boston loses krug they’d be better looking for a replacement rather than adding both Killorn AND Rakell. You kinda overpowered the forwards and left the left side D out to dry lol


Quoting: ON3M4N
No we don't. We just lack young centers and he's our best one. With Krejci/Bergeron getting older we have a hard time trading him unless we're getting another young center back.


Quoting: bhavikp27
Well, as a contender, we don't have 4-5 prospects like him, so it's normal we want to keep him. Especially with 46/37 getting old.
And easy to say when you have been mediocre/bad for the past 5/6 past years and had time to draft 34 players (9 top5 picks in 1st/2nd/3rd rounds)

So cancel the Studnicka (and Beecher) trades, they aren't available for trade.



Unless the trade was edited, Beecher is C, but can play LW I believe. Anyways, he's not available for trade.

Definitely not helping TBL with their cap problems. (And giving up Studnicka)
Don't need Rakell (and it costs a lot).
Correct deal for Grzelcyk. Bjork and Chara also. DeBrusk as well, although he could get a bit more ($).



Yall the post is @Leafs_and_sens_fan its a troll post.
He consistantly underrates bruins guys and has no clue what hes doing on here lol
CatmanV liked this.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 11:06 a.m.
#15
MMBzFan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 281
Live in SoCal Ducks like Rakell. Sweeney has plans for Studnicka. It would take a lot to trade him away with Bergeron/Krejci aging.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 1:34 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Its not about that. Studnicka is a solid top 6 Center prospect. Like Cirelli was (until this year) or like Brett Howden (but Stud it better)...

Its just a bad trade


Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Yall the post is @Leafs_and_sens_fan its a troll post.
He consistantly underrates bruins guys and has no clue what hes doing on here lol


Coming from the guy who is saying Studnicka's comparable is Cirelli...
Quoting: ON3M4N
No we don't. We just lack young centers and he's our best one. With Krejci/Bergeron getting older we have a hard time trading him unless we're getting another young center back.


Most of you guys don't but some do. Look above.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 1:41 p.m.
#17
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,499
Likes: 25,389
Anaheim needs immediate help at RD, not future help at C. As tempting as those two 2021 picks are, we'd say no, thanks.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 1:45 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Anaheim needs immediate help at RD, not future help at C. As tempting as those two 2021 picks are, we'd say no, thanks.


Anaheim needs futures not players right now. Even if they had Pietrangelo they still wouldn't be contenders.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 1:54 p.m.
#19
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Coming from the guy who is saying Studnicka's comparable is Cirelli...

Most of you guys don't but some do. Look above.


Exactly why i said "until this year", this year Cirelli jumped and became a beast. lol You really are nuts
CatmanV liked this.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 1:57 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Exactly why i said "until this year", this year Cirelli jumped and became a beast. lol You really are nuts


I don't know why you have so much anger towards me. Please take it down a notch.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,507
Likes: 4,566
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Coming from the guy who is saying Studnicka's comparable is Cirelli...

Most of you guys don't but some do. Look above.


I don't think Cirelli is a bad comp actually. Both are 200ft centers, roughly the same size and had similar production during the time in the AHL.

Does all the little things necessary. Owns tremendous hockey sense and two-way acumen. His playmaking skills are at a high level, as is his work rate and compete level. Does not have ideal size for the National Hockey League game, so he need to add bulk and get physically stronger in order to maximize output at the highest level.

Two way centreman who leads by example with grit, giddy-up, and great team first gumption. His quick feet get him going and he deceptive slides into open seams looking for the puck. Well schooled and solid in his own end, and is calm and smart during the heat of the play. An unselfish player who will work passing plays from all the areas in front and work the wall and around the horn to unearth pucks too

One of those scouting reports is on Studnicka and the other is on Cirelli.
Silkysmooth42 liked this.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 2:02 p.m.
#22
GM CRIME DAWG
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 4,972
Likes: 2,702
Looks like the scouts can stay in self-isolation for many a year to come...
Any GM that creates that many future holes; has no future!
CatmanV and Silkysmooth42 liked this.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 2:10 p.m.
#23
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,499
Likes: 25,389
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Anaheim needs futures not players right now. Even if they had Pietrangelo they still wouldn't be contenders.


The simplistic binary fallacy of "futures" vs "players" is amusing. You don't go from outhouse to penthouse in one season. (See the Islanders.). You have to develop a culture of winning. We intend to improve on last year by winning more games this year. That won't be done if we fail to improve at RD.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 3:24 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,507
Likes: 4,566
Quoting: OldNYIfan
The simplistic binary fallacy of "futures" vs "players" is amusing. You don't go from outhouse to penthouse in one season. (See the Islanders.). You have to develop a culture of winning. We intend to improve on last year by winning more games this year. That won't be done if we fail to improve at RD.


This right here is what so many people miss and its a reason that having the right core is key to a teams success. Its also a reason why Boston puts a lot of emphasis on leadership when the look to sign/trade/draft players. In fact if you look at the Bruins roster, many have worn the C or A at some point whether it be juniors, college, international or AHL.
OldNYIfan and bhavikp27 liked this.
Jun. 16, 2020 at 3:50 p.m.
#25
CatmanVal
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 209
Likes: 123
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Coming from the guy who is saying Studnicka's comparable is Cirelli...

Most of you guys don't but some do. Look above.


Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Exactly why i said "until this year", this year Cirelli jumped and became a beast. lol You really are nuts


Quoting: ON3M4N
I don't think Cirelli is a bad comp actually. Both are 200ft centers, roughly the same size and had similar production during the time in the AHL.

Does all the little things necessary. Owns tremendous hockey sense and two-way acumen. His playmaking skills are at a high level, as is his work rate and compete level. Does not have ideal size for the National Hockey League game, so he need to add bulk and get physically stronger in order to maximize output at the highest level.

Two way centreman who leads by example with grit, giddy-up, and great team first gumption. His quick feet get him going and he deceptive slides into open seams looking for the puck. Well schooled and solid in his own end, and is calm and smart during the heat of the play. An unselfish player who will work passing plays from all the areas in front and work the wall and around the horn to unearth pucks too

One of those scouting reports is on Studnicka and the other is on Cirelli.


Precisely!
Stud is not as good as Cirelli (and @silkysmooth42 made that clear), but in terms of value BEFORE this past season, that is a perfect comparison.
Silkysmooth42 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit