SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Big Ideas

Created by: Copenhagen
Team: 2020-21 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 20, 2020
Published: Jul. 20, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$6,000,000
2$1,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,500,000
Trades
1.
EDM
  1. DeBrusk, Jake [RFA Rights]
2.
3.
4.
EDM
  1. 2020 2nd round pick (EDM)
DET
  1. Athanasiou, Andreas [RFA Rights]
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2021
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the EDM
2022
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$81,797,699$341,534$730,000-$297,699

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$230,000$230K)
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$875,000$875,000
LW
UFA - 1
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,900,000$1,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,150,000$2,150,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,167,000$4,167,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,166,666$4,166,666
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,600,000$5,600,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,250,000$4,250,000
G
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$915,000$915,000
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 21, 2020 at 8:21 a.m.
#26
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,147
Likes: 6,988
Quoting: MNBassman
Since you clearly don’t value Broberg, the Wild counter with Hartman for Russell and Broberg.


What?
Copenhagen liked this.
Jul. 21, 2020 at 8:21 a.m.
#27
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,147
Likes: 6,988
Quoting: Copenhagen
I look at it as who care about poolparty or Benning, so in my head its Debrusk for Broberg


Agreed. Now ask yourself why on earth boston would do that?
Jul. 21, 2020 at 8:31 a.m.
#28
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,044
Likes: 7,751
Quoting: ON3M4N
That deal does nothing to help Boston. Benning used to be Boston property and they never signed him. Broberg is a solid prospect, but Boaton is loaded at LHD, in win now mode and Broberg is still playing in the SHL. That leaves Pool Party, who didn't show much in his first 139 NHL games.

Boston is looking for secondary scoring and this deal does the opposite of that.


I agree. At the same time, there's zero chance Holland pays that price, not when he can go out and sign a UFA for similar money and performance.
Jul. 21, 2020 at 8:34 a.m.
#29
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,044
Likes: 7,751
Quoting: Copenhagen
Would you rather protect Raanta or Miko for the expansion draft, me Raanta all the way.


Raanta is a UFA. Why would you protect him at all? Makes no sense.
Jul. 21, 2020 at 8:58 a.m.
#30
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
AA isn't returning no 2nd round pick, We'll give you a 5th for him and you'll like it.
Jul. 21, 2020 at 8:58 a.m.
#31
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
AA isn't returning no 2nd round pick, We'll give you a 5th for him and you'll like it.
Jul. 21, 2020 at 9:15 a.m.
#32
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,146
Likes: 3,571
Quoting: Bcarlo25
What?


I was making a tongue-in-cheek jab at @Copenhagen for under-valuing Broberg in the DeBrusk trade above.
Jul. 21, 2020 at 9:35 a.m.
#33
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,147
Likes: 6,988
Quoting: MNBassman
I was making a tongue-in-cheek jab at @Copenhagen for under-valuing Broberg in the DeBrusk trade above.


Oh, he wasn’t, but oh.
Copenhagen and MNBassman liked this.
Jul. 21, 2020 at 9:36 a.m.
#34
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,044
Likes: 7,751
Broberg seems to be progressing nicely. Honestly I think people forget that he's only about 3 months older than some of the 2020 draft's biggest names - Lafreniere and Rossi, for instance.

https://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/philip-broberg-earned-invitation-stay-oilers-summer/
Copenhagen and MNBassman liked this.
Jul. 21, 2020 at 9:37 a.m.
#35
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,649
Likes: 2,517
Quoting: CD282
Raanta is a UFA. Why would you protect him at all? Makes no sense.


Good point, another hand shake deal like Larsson
CD282 liked this.
Jul. 21, 2020 at 9:39 a.m.
#36
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,649
Likes: 2,517
Quoting: CD282
I agree. At the same time, there's zero chance Holland pays that price, not when he can go out and sign a UFA for similar money and performance.


UFA's usually are closer to their last legs than someone around McDavids age that we can lock up for a long time and become scoring machines. Just got to be choosy who it is and how durable they will be.
Jul. 21, 2020 at 9:40 a.m.
#37
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,649
Likes: 2,517
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Agreed. Now ask yourself why on earth boston would do that?


The reason why I said that is because they are expendable. Like i said above. Poolparty is not playing here PERIOD and therefore is nothing but a trade piece or draft pick
Jul. 21, 2020 at 9:57 a.m.
#38
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,044
Likes: 7,751
Quoting: Copenhagen
Good point, another hand shake deal like Larsson


Could work. Raanta certainly has good enough numbers to pursue.
Copenhagen liked this.
Jul. 21, 2020 at 10:15 a.m.
#39
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,617
Likes: 2,764
Quoting: Copenhagen
Chara will retire in 1 or 2 years and Broberg can replace him. Boston can sign all the rest of its players with that trade. Lose nobody


They are high on vaakaneinen to replace chara when he retires. We can already sign all of our players without this trade.
Jul. 21, 2020 at 11:07 a.m.
#40
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,147
Likes: 6,988
Quoting: Copenhagen
The reason why I said that is because they are expendable. Like i said above. Poolparty is not playing here PERIOD and therefore is nothing but a trade piece or draft pick


Okay, so let’s just think about this for a second.
You’re trading, from the bruins perspective, a good prospect, and two players that are healthy scratches for them, and the bruins have to give up a young top six winger.

Soooo the Stanley cup contending boston bruins trade one of their most important forwards, for two guys that aren’t going to play for them, and a prospect that might play for them down the road.

Now ask yourself, why on earth do the bruins do this?
Jul. 21, 2020 at 11:30 a.m.
#41
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,649
Likes: 2,517
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Okay, so let’s just think about this for a second.
You’re trading, from the bruins perspective, a good prospect, and two players that are healthy scratches for them, and the bruins have to give up a young top six winger.

Soooo the Stanley cup contending boston bruins trade one of their most important forwards, for two guys that aren’t going to play for them, and a prospect that might play for them down the road.

Now ask yourself, why on earth do the bruins do this?


Why to resign everyone in the next couple years. Why to upgrade their 3rd pair RD and 2nd RW side. Why to replace Chara with a stud D that is playing first line minutes with men already at 18 years old, no just 19 years old. Lots of reason why.
Most of your top prospects appear to be LW
Jul. 21, 2020 at 11:37 a.m.
#42
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,649
Likes: 2,517
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Okay, so let’s just think about this for a second.
You’re trading, from the bruins perspective, a good prospect, and two players that are healthy scratches for them, and the bruins have to give up a young top six winger.

Soooo the Stanley cup contending boston bruins trade one of their most important forwards, for two guys that aren’t going to play for them, and a prospect that might play for them down the road.

Now ask yourself, why on earth do the bruins do this?


By the way, good luck signing everyone, I like the Bruins and I love Marchand and Gallager (Canadians) I remember them on the same line at the Hockey championships I think it was and that line was chaos.
Jul. 21, 2020 at 12:08 p.m.
#43
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,147
Likes: 6,988
Quoting: Copenhagen
Why to resign everyone in the next couple years. Why to upgrade their 3rd pair RD and 2nd RW side. Why to replace Chara with a stud D that is playing first line minutes with men already at 18 years old, no just 19 years old. Lots of reason why.
Most of your top prospects appear to be LW


What? Okay. A lot of issues here. First off it appears you don’t know much about the bruins prospect system. Who are these LW prospects you speak of? Lauko. Okay i guess. No, the bruins top prospects are left D, and i guess center.

Let’s get a couple things straight though, Benning doesn’t see a shift for the bruins. He’s maybe their number 9 D. Benning and Puljujarvi provide legitimately no value to the bruins in the context of this deal. Wasted roster spots mitigated by upside in Puljujarvi I guess.

I think maybe you should take a gander at the bruins cap situation. They don’t really have any crunch coming this year. When it comes time to re-sign McAvoy, and Carlo and Debrusk are both off their current deals, maybe.

As for the chara thing, give Urho Vaakainanen a google.

Bottom line you’re asking the presidents trophy winning cup contender to trade a top six forward for a prospect that plays their strongest position when it comes to organizational depth. Value may be fine, but it’s just a horrible concept for boston that wouldn’t warrant a second of thought from Don Sweeney.
Jul. 21, 2020 at 12:31 p.m.
#44
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Bruins reject.

Lol what team need of the bruins does this address?

So obvious damn
Jul. 21, 2020 at 12:32 p.m.
#45
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,649
Likes: 2,517
Quoting: Bcarlo25
What? Okay. A lot of issues here. First off it appears you don’t know much about the bruins prospect system. Who are these LW prospects you speak of? Lauko. Okay i guess. No, the bruins top prospects are left D, and i guess center.

Let’s get a couple things straight though, Benning doesn’t see a shift for the bruins. He’s maybe their number 9 D. Benning and Puljujarvi provide legitimately no value to the bruins in the context of this deal. Wasted roster spots mitigated by upside in Puljujarvi I guess.

I think maybe you should take a gander at the bruins cap situation. They don’t really have any crunch coming this year. When it comes time to re-sign McAvoy, and Carlo and Debrusk are both off their current deals, maybe.

As for the chara thing, give Urho Vaakainanen a google.

Bottom line you’re asking the presidents trophy winning cup contender to trade a top six forward for a prospect that plays their strongest position when it comes to organizational depth. Value may be fine, but it’s just a horrible concept for boston that wouldn’t warrant a second of thought from Don Sweeney.


I did look at their prospects before i did this, but just on the internet. Frederic, Lauko, Bjork are all left shot and probably only 1 makes it to the NHL and the odds of them being a center are not great. Same as the Oilers and all their prospects will not make it to the NHL.

Benning, I am not sure he would be the 9th D in Boston (During the last three seasons at 5v5, Benning has ranked 18th among NHL defenceman with over 2300 minutes played in goals for percentage with a 54.87 — a far cry from the next ranked Oilers D in Darnell Nurse, who ranks 75th with a GF% of 49.43.)

Vaakainanen we all know he is going to be a stud, but he still isnt Broberg material.

Each to your own, if the deal doesnt work it doesnt work. All things on this site are ideas and it is hard to make trades in the real world as well. I picked on Debrusk assuming he would love to play in his home town on the first line with McDavid.
Jul. 21, 2020 at 12:33 p.m.
#46
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,649
Likes: 2,517
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Bruins reject.

Lol what team need of the bruins does this address?

So obvious damn


I thought I went over that already.
Jul. 21, 2020 at 12:35 p.m.
#47
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Copenhagen
I thought I went over that already.


Where? I see no description or anything

And if you except me to read 40 comments you are sadly mistaken

I am just informing you that the bruins reject, theres not much to discuss
Jul. 21, 2020 at 12:54 p.m.
#48
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,147
Likes: 6,988
Quoting: Copenhagen
I did look at their prospects before i did this, but just on the internet. Frederic, Lauko, Bjork are all left shot and probably only 1 makes it to the NHL and the odds of them being a center are not great. Same as the Oilers and all their prospects will not make it to the NHL.

Benning, I am not sure he would be the 9th D in Boston (During the last three seasons at 5v5, Benning has ranked 18th among NHL defenceman with over 2300 minutes played in goals for percentage with a 54.87 — a far cry from the next ranked Oilers D in Darnell Nurse, who ranks 75th with a GF% of 49.43.)

Vaakainanen we all know he is going to be a stud, but he still isnt Broberg material.

Each to your own, if the deal doesnt work it doesnt work. All things on this site are ideas and it is hard to make trades in the real world as well. I picked on Debrusk assuming he would love to play in his home town on the first line with McDavid.


Bjork is an NHL player. I don’t consider him a prospect anymore. Lauko is a kid that has 22 pro games. Promising, but that’s it. Then Frederic kind of looks like a sure fire bottom six center. Definitely doesn’t strike me as a wing though. Also, I kind of think Bjork is a better player on the right wing.

Anyway, the value is probably fine, it just seems like this is the kind of deal the kings might make if they had a 3rd year player like debrusk that wasn’t keen on re-signing. It’s just not a move a true contender makes from a logic standpoint.
Copenhagen liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll