SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Zuccarello

Created by: Ducks
Team: 2020-21 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 28, 2020
Published: Jul. 28, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
ANA
  1. Zuccarello, Mats ($2,000,000 retained)
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2021
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2022
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
19$81,500,000$66,907,166$0$0$14,592,834
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,700,000$1,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$863,333$863,333
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$8,250,000$8,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,456,250$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,800,000$2,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,133,333$1,133,333
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$863,333$863,333
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$700,000$700,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,050,000$2,050,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
UFA - 7
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,602,778$2,602,778
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 28, 2020 at 10:27 p.m.
#1
HutsonNorlinderGuhle
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 2,768
Likes: 1,377
What’s the point in getting Backes in the Kase trade instead of a pick just to trade him again?
Jul. 28, 2020 at 10:41 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
TAVARES IS A LEAF
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 659
Likes: 175
Quoting: HabsFan9
What’s the point in getting Backes in the Kase trade instead of a pick just to trade him again?


Backes was a dump lol we didn’t want him
Jul. 28, 2020 at 11:20 p.m.
#3
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 3,960
Likes: 1,658
YES YES YES
Ducks liked this.
Jul. 29, 2020 at 1:56 a.m.
#4
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,721
Likes: 2,805
Why would Minnesota do this trade? Zuc is still a quality winger. They have enough old 4th liners.
Jul. 29, 2020 at 1:56 a.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,721
Likes: 2,805
Also why would a cap strapped team retain 2M for another 4 years?
Jul. 29, 2020 at 4:06 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
TAVARES IS A LEAF
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 659
Likes: 175
Quoting: Bf3351
Also why would a cap strapped team retain 2M for another 4 years?


They save 4M for 3 of em
Jul. 29, 2020 at 4:44 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 8,221
Likes: 3,642
Quoting: Bf3351
Why would Minnesota do this trade? Zuc is still a quality winger. They have enough old 4th liners.


Zucc wasn't good for MN, and his contract is awful. MN has too many wings already. It opens up another protection slot (Zucc has a NMC) for MN in the expansion draft.

Quoting: Bf3351
Also why would a cap strapped team retain 2M for another 4 years?


MN has one of the better cap situations in the league right now. In this trade 1 year of Backes would be 500k more and 3 years of $4m in savings over just keeping Zucc.

All that being said I see no reason for Zucc to waive his NMC for ANA.
MNBassman liked this.
Jul. 29, 2020 at 11:28 a.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,721
Likes: 2,805
Quoting: wabit
Zucc wasn't good for MN, and his contract is awful. MN has too many wings already. It opens up another protection slot (Zucc has a NMC) for MN in the expansion draft.



MN has one of the better cap situations in the league right now. In this trade 1 year of Backes would be 500k more and 3 years of $4m in savings over just keeping Zucc.

All that being said I see no reason for Zucc to waive his NMC for ANA.


No team is ever going to retain 2M for 4 years. I dont care how you look at it.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll