SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Flames Moves ARI and PHI

Created by: nomad
Team: 2020-21 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 9, 2020
Published: Sep. 9, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
For Arizona, they have been rumored to be willing to part with Kuemper in need of top 6 forwards. Mangiapane is young and solidified himself as a top 6 forward with room to improve. Rittich is not at the caliber of Kuemper, but was an All-Star goalie that would be a great 1B or a decent 1A with Raanta - and is much cheaper than Kuemper. Calgary gets a chance to sign Hall before free agency which allows them to confidently trade Gaudreau know they have his replacement.

With Philly, I suspect they won't love this trade, but neither do Flames fans, so it could be fair value. Gaudreau is the better player and on a great contract. He will also resign with Philly at a discount. Myers is a RD that calgary needs, and Kylington has tons of potential but is just buried on the left side in Calgary. The picks are to balance things out, but could be changed or omitted as people see fit.

As a flames fan, I would also be looking for trades for Ryan to unload some salary and bring in a less expensive 4C, freeing up some money for a #6 RD.

Philly and ARI fans - is the value close?
Flames fans? Are we any better?
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$790,000
2$725,000
2$725,000
2$775,000
2$725,000
2$3,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$6,750,000
3$1,500,000
3$1,100,000
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Kuemper, Darcy
Additional Details:
Rights to Hall
2.
CGY
  1. Konecny, Travis
  2. Myers, Philippe [RFA Rights]
  3. 2020 2nd round pick (PHI)
PHI
  1. Gaudreau, Johnny
  2. Kylington, Oliver [RFA Rights]
  3. 2020 4th round pick (SJS)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2022
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$73,293,332$0$1,372,500$8,206,668

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,125,000$3,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$801,666$801,666 (Performance Bonus$65,000$65K)
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$790,000$790,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 4
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RD
RFA - 1
$1,500,000$1,500,000
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 9, 2020 at 2:36 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,334
Likes: 19,566
Hall's not signing for under 7M...
nomad liked this.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 2:42 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Flames Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 82
Likes: 11
Generally I would agree, but with Treliving having a reputation as a solid contract negotiation, Hall wanting to play in Calgary (rumored), and a flat cap over the next few years, around 7 seems possible on the longer 7 year term I used. With a Ryan trade we could afford Hall up to 7,500,000 but I'd likely shave a year or two off the term if that was the case.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 3:18 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,334
Likes: 19,566
Quoting: nomad
Generally I would agree, but with Treliving having a reputation as a solid contract negotiation, Hall wanting to play in Calgary (rumored), and a flat cap over the next few years, around 7 seems possible on the longer 7 year term I used. With a Ryan trade we could afford Hall up to 7,500,000 but I'd likely shave a year or two off the term if that was the case.


Treliving has a reputation for negotiating with RFA's not UFA's. Also what's the point in trading for Hall's rights?

If you are going to respond to someone hit the "reply" button otherwise they don't get notified.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 3:40 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 9,527
Likes: 8,968
I like the look of this team, but I would deal Ryan, just anywhere for a pick. Hall will make minimum 7.5. I was told by an Arizona fan the ask for Kuemper was 1st + B prospect. I think it might be a better idea to do that, and bridge Mangiapane for 1-2 years. We can find another trade partner for Rittich and get a pick. For a backup I’d rather trade a 3rd to Ottawa for Nilsson at half retained (1.3mil), Brossoit is pretty bad. Not sure if all this works out cap wise (mental math is telling me we can sign Mangiapane to a 2yr 2.5mil bridge deal if we decrease Rieder to 800k and run a 22-man roster, is that right?) but keeping Mangiapane would be better if possible, it would mean Lindholm can slide to 2C, which gives us crazy C depth. Might also make Backlund expendable but I don’t want to get into that lol
Sep. 9, 2020 at 6:55 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 596
Likes: 328
Flyers are light on RW, incredibly shallow on RHD and have 6 NHL caliber LW on the current roster... so yeah, we don’t live the trade. It doesn’t help us fill any roster hole but creates two new ones.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 8:20 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 106
Likes: 22
Quoting: ALitteral
Flyers are light on RW, incredibly shallow on RHD and have 6 NHL caliber LW on the current roster... so yeah, we don’t live the trade. It doesn’t help us fill any roster hole but creates two new ones.


Yea I kinda feel like with the contract they gave TK they won't move him. I have a feeling its farabee/frost that goes in a gaudreau trade
Sep. 13, 2020 at 12:27 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Flames Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 82
Likes: 11
Quoting: mulletmario7
Yea I kinda feel like with the contract they gave TK they won't move him. I have a feeling its farabee/frost that goes in a gaudreau trade


That does make sense. If it's Farabee (preferred over Frost) then likely would need another smaller add. With that said, I think Calgary has be careful not to go quantity over quality. We need at least 1 quality piece and some futures for Gaudreau for the trade to be considered a success. Not convinced Philly is the best trade partner, but we all know that's where he'd like to end up!
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll