SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Maybe ish

Created by: DDossett
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 25, 2020
Published: Sep. 25, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I'm not saying this is a good idea. It has a few initial assumptions.
1. NMC's are waived for whatever reason
2. Toronto is willing, maybe even interested in moving Travares
3. NYRs are interested in Travares and sees it already has a back log at left wing trading 1oa
I don't think montour's great but he fits a right d slot that definately available and at 11mil its marners job to make that second line good. That being said i have the same top 6 and 16 mil to shore up goal add a 1 solid right d and flesh ou the bottom 6.
I'm not counting on prospect just hoping one shows up for me.
I'm mostly curious if the trades seam fair or interesting even. Constructive feedback please, this was just a fun idea.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,750,000
2$1,750,000
2$3,500,000
1$3,500,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Lafreniere, Alexis
3$975,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Lundqvist, Henrik ($4,250,000 retained)
  2. Strome, Ryan [RFA Rights]
  3. 2020 1st round pick (NYR)
NYR
  1. Tavares, John
  2. 2020 1st round pick (PIT)
2.
TOR
  1. Reimer, James
  2. Staal, Jordan
Additional Details:
I'd rather it was for staal if carolina fans are more open to that....
CAR
3.
BUF
  1. Reimer, James ($1,000,000 retained)
  2. 2020 4th round pick (VGK)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$74,434,783$0$400,000$7,065,217
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Lafreniere, Alexis
$975,000$975,000
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$821,667$821,667
LW, RW
RFA - 4
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
-$2,750,000-$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 25, 2020 at 9:20 p.m.
#1
j_cash08
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 587
Likes: 169
You'd get more than that for Tavares
Sep. 25, 2020 at 9:24 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,705
Likes: 7,376
yep, this is a worse team
chaserice liked this.
Sep. 25, 2020 at 9:25 p.m.
#3
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 18,607
Likes: 6,737
Quoting: jcash08
You'd get more than that for Tavares


They aren't getting anywhere near that.
Spanky227, chaserice, ASKDUBUS and 2 others liked this.
Sep. 25, 2020 at 9:26 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 782
Likes: 339
Quoting: jcash08
You'd get more than that for Tavares


How much more do you think?
Sep. 25, 2020 at 9:29 p.m.
#5
j_cash08
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 587
Likes: 169
Quoting: DDossett
How much more do you think?


Well, Lundqvist is a partial cap dump and Strome has not been good any other season other than this past one. Start by definitely taking out the Pit 1st. and probably ask for a young roster player or prospect as well.
Sep. 25, 2020 at 9:38 p.m.
#6
Tspky
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 3,885
Likes: 980
Quoting: jcash08
Well, Lundqvist is a partial cap dump and Strome has not been good any other season other than this past one. Start by definitely taking out the Pit 1st. and probably ask for a young roster player or prospect as well.


Why do the rangers do this? They don’t. Stop leafs fans, you are not getting the number one pick for any trade you would be willing to do
chaserice liked this.
Sep. 25, 2020 at 9:38 p.m.
#7
Servant of Chaos
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 453
imagine thinking you're going to get the 1st overall pick for that
chaserice liked this.
Sep. 25, 2020 at 9:42 p.m.
#8
j_cash08
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 587
Likes: 169
Quoting: Spanky227
Why do the rangers do this? They don’t. Stop leafs fans, you are not getting the number one pick for any trade you would be willing to do


Not a Leafs fan LOL. When I read it i thought it was the 2021 1st. And NYR does this because they had trouble providing offence anytime Zibanejad wasn't on the ice and they need to move a goalie. the best option is Lundqvist.
DDossett liked this.
Sep. 25, 2020 at 9:42 p.m.
#9
Tspky
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 3,885
Likes: 980
Quoting: jcash08
Not a Leafs fan LOL. When I read it i thought it was the 2021 1st


I meant that towards whoever created this
jcash08 liked this.
Sep. 25, 2020 at 10:02 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,705
Likes: 7,376
Quoting: Spanky227
Why do the rangers do this? They don’t. Stop leafs fans, you are not getting the number one pick for any trade you would be willing to do


then why do the leafs do it? i mean the rangers arnt getting tavares for anything that they would be willing to do
Sep. 25, 2020 at 10:05 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 782
Likes: 339
Quoting: Spanky227
Why do the rangers do this? They don’t. Stop leafs fans, you are not getting the number one pick for any trade you would be willing to do


Im not a leafs fan, its not even so much for leafs getting the 1st. I actually was looking to upgrade NYR at center. I know people get super excited about 1st overall picks but they don't = cups. Well built teams that make sensible trades and draft well = cups. How many first overalls are on boston or st. Louis? Travares himself is a first overall, he left NYI and now some how they're a regular at the conference finals (not that thats a pro JT point). Your still getting a 1st rnd pick this year and an center that makes you a legit contender, i was doing this for the rangers.
Sep. 25, 2020 at 10:12 p.m.
#12
j_cash08
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 587
Likes: 169
Quoting: DDossett
Im not a leafs fan, its not even so much for leafs getting the 1st. I actually was looking to upgrade NYR at center. I know people get super excited about 1st overall picks but they don't = cups. Well built teams that make sensible trades and draft well = cups. How many first overalls are on boston or st. Louis? Travares himself is a first overall, he left NYI and now some how they're a regular at the conference finals (not that thats a pro JT point). Your still getting a 1st rnd pick this year and an center that makes you a legit contender, i was doing this for the rangers.


NYR wont be trading the 2020 1st. Change that to the 2021 1st and take out the Pits 1st and you have a good deal IMO.

Teams that do well, draft and develop well while signing/trading for key role players to play around their core/top talent.
Sep. 25, 2020 at 10:16 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 782
Likes: 339
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
then why do the leafs do it? i mean the rangers arnt getting tavares for anything that they would be willing to do


The leafs do this to clear cap and leave marner to fulfil his contract. They're paying more for centers than any other team in the league and its not working. For me, again im a sabre's fan not a leafs fan, its time to change course. If you think changing a goalie or adding a great right d is all the leafs need to do then this trades not for you. But this makes a new leafs with options and potential go a different with a solid top 6 for next 3 years.
Sep. 25, 2020 at 10:20 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 782
Likes: 339
Quoting: jcash08
NYR wont be trading the 2020 1st. Change that to the 2021 1st and take out the Pits 1st and you have a good deal IMO.

Teams that do well, draft and develop well while signing/trading for key role players to play around their core/top talent.


Nope, in this instance the leafs want dynamic talent back in the trade and thier building with thier wings. Your gonna have to give the 1oa 2020. Good luck with lias andersson
Sep. 25, 2020 at 10:22 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 782
Likes: 339
Not sure what happened there
Sep. 25, 2020 at 10:23 p.m.
#16
j_cash08
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 587
Likes: 169
Quoting: DDossett
Nope, in this instance the leafs want dynamic talent back in the trade and thier building with thier wings. Your gonna have to give the 1oa 2020. Good luck with lias andersson


That will never happen, NYR will never move that 1st.
Sep. 25, 2020 at 10:28 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 782
Likes: 339
Quoting: jcash08
That will never happen, NYR will never move that 1st.


Ok. But your not opposed to adding Travares? Again just curious if you like that look with NYR.
Sep. 25, 2020 at 10:30 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,705
Likes: 7,376
Quoting: DDossett
The leafs do this to clear cap and leave marner to fulfil his contract. They're paying more for centers than any other team in the league and its not working. For me, again im a sabre's fan not a leafs fan, its time to change course. If you think changing a goalie or adding a great right d is all the leafs need to do then this trades not for you. But this makes a new leafs with options and potential go a different with a solid top 6 for next 3 years.


this angle is so tired "you need to trade your great players for significantly less value because something good might come along later!"
it's nonsense. Tavares the leafs have had Tavares and Matthews for like a season and a half and one year they took the 2nd best team in the league to 7 games and then there was a global pandemic that made everything go crazy. "it's not working" is some lazy analysis
Sep. 25, 2020 at 10:43 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 782
Likes: 339
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
this angle is so tired "you need to trade your great players for significantly less value because something good might come along later!"
it's nonsense. Tavares the leafs have had Tavares and Matthews for like a season and a half and one year they took the 2nd best team in the league to 7 games and then there was a global pandemic that made everything go crazy. "it's not working" is some lazy analysis


I wouldn't say lazy, I just don't know what the issue is but they are not IMO as good up front as they should be.
As far as the "tired angle" of trading off your best players, Lafreniere is right on the team adding offense to make up for JT. In my defense of "trading for less than value" where should the value be for him? I have rangers fans telling me thier getting ripped off so wheres the value of travares in your opinion? Also what do you think of the resulting team? Drastically worse' serviceable, not bad? I think its at least flexible and not trying to figure out its cap every year. I posted this to get takes on it after all.
Sep. 25, 2020 at 10:48 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,705
Likes: 7,376
Quoting: DDossett
I wouldn't say lazy, I just don't know what the issue is but they are not IMO as good up front as they should be.
As far as the "tired angle" of trading off your best players, Lafreniere is right on the team adding offense to make up for JT. In my defense of "trading for less than value" where should the value be for him? I have rangers fans telling me thier getting ripped off so wheres the value of travares in your opinion? Also what do you think of the resulting team? Drastically worse' serviceable, not bad? I think its at least flexible and not trying to figure out its cap every year. I posted this to get takes on it after all.


it's very lazy because it's repeated as gospel with zero analysis past "but the cap!"
As far as his value, well the first over all is probably good vaccum value for him but i can see why the rangers wouldnt do it. And to my point there really isnt anything the rangers would realistically offer for him that would be good enough for the leafs.
the resulting team is much worse. the downgrade at C at both 2 and 3 is not offset by Laf, especially as a rookie, Lazar is bad and the goaltending is worse. And the defense is, at best exactly the same as last year because Montour isnt good
Sep. 25, 2020 at 11:02 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 782
Likes: 339
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
it's very lazy because it's repeated as gospel with zero analysis past "but the cap!"
As far as his value, well the first over all is probably good vaccum value for him but i can see why the rangers wouldnt do it. And to my point there really isnt anything the rangers would realistically offer for him that would be good enough for the leafs.
the resulting team is much worse. the downgrade at C at both 2 and 3 is not offset by Laf, especially as a rookie, Lazar is bad and the goaltending is worse. And the defense is, at best exactly the same as last year because Montour isnt good


I disagree with 3c being a down grade. And if there's no trade there fine, i still haven't seen any reason it doesn't benefit both sides fo the next 3 years. Thank tho
Sep. 25, 2020 at 11:15 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 4,032
Likes: 1,923
Why would buffalo do this?
Sep. 26, 2020 at 12:49 a.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 782
Likes: 339
Quoting: OrganizedConfusion55
Why would buffalo do this?


Dry market for montour, Cheap dependable backup. Lazar doesn't really have value as a piece right now and although i would love to get more for montour than a low 4th and a backup goalie (especially in this market) i'll believe the sabres can do better when i see it. There's a lot of bad faith between me and them and the fact that we haven't traded or extended montour as of a year ago is the tip of the iceberg.
Aside from that i needed a way to unload a goalie for a 4th line rw and right d. Now that's where i got lazy! Honestly the more i look at it i think the sabres win cuz the 4th. And bernier makes more of an impact with sabres than montour with leafs imo.
Sep. 26, 2020 at 8:45 a.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 4,032
Likes: 1,923
Quoting: DDossett
Dry market for montour, Cheap dependable backup. Lazar doesn't really have value as a piece right now and although i would love to get more for montour than a low 4th and a backup goalie (especially in this market) i'll believe the sabres can do better when i see it. There's a lot of bad faith between me and them and the fact that we haven't traded or extended montour as of a year ago is the tip of the iceberg.
Aside from that i needed a way to unload a goalie for a 4th line rw and right d. Now that's where i got lazy! Honestly the more i look at it i think the sabres win cuz the 4th. And bernier makes more of an impact with sabres than montour with leafs imo.


Yeah, you have no idea what the market is for him, and if anything, we can keep him. This trade blows chunks
Sep. 26, 2020 at 10:28 a.m.
#25
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 782
Likes: 339
Quoting: OrganizedConfusion55
Yeah, you have no idea what the market is for him, and if anything, we can keep him. This trade blows chunks


Please clarify you think the market is much higher for montour? I find often enough he is compared to risto. It seems hard enough to move risto, because of contract however last year RFA rights with arbitration rights isn't much better i feel. Montour getting 4750000 in arbitration or something could be just as bad as making this trade. Especially if we can't move risto. Picture paying 10mil to the two of them just for montour to go UFA. Isn't that worse then ending up with a 4th?
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll