SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

We Suck and I am Sad

Created by: jsmith19895845
Team: 2020-21 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 19, 2020
Published: Oct. 19, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$4,000,000
2$1,000,000
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. 2022 5th round pick (DET)
2.
BOS
  1. 2021 4th round pick (BUF)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the DET
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$75,537,556$964,222$2,107,500$5,962,444
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,600,000$1,600,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$700,000$700,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,687,500$3,687,500
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,850,000$2,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,250,000$2,250,000 (Performance Bonus$1,250,000$1M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,250,000$1,250,000 (Performance Bonus$750,000$750K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$769,167$769,167 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
RW, C
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 19, 2020 at 4:04 p.m.
#26
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
Quoting: BStinson
He isn’t overly physical so I’m not too worried about falling off a cliff like Lucic. I was under the impression Studnicka was untouchable for the most part and I think that’d cripple Boston as Bergeron and Krejci age. The offer is definitely something to consider.


I would think they would have to really love Beecher to do something like that. I think Coyle could be a solid #2. Bergeron has a couple more years left at a high level. I could see the Bruins re-signing Krejci for another year or two for 4-5m.
Oct. 19, 2020 at 4:04 p.m.
#27
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 21,682
Likes: 12,028
Quoting: BStinson
He isn’t overly physical so I’m not too worried about falling off a cliff like Lucic. I was under the impression Studnicka was untouchable for the most part and I think that’d cripple Boston as Bergeron and Krejci age. The offer is definitely something to consider.


I agree Detroit just has no interest in moving Mantha at this point.
Oct. 19, 2020 at 4:09 p.m.
#28
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
Quoting: Ryminister_27
Marchand and Pastrnak are out for the start of the season. In a shortened season, good luck catching up. They didn't add any significant pieces. Smith is a third liner. Kase from last season is nothing special. They needed a d-man and they didn't get anyone. Lauzon isn't a top 4 right now. Krug was a huge loss and they're full of question marks every where else. They don't look like a playoff team at all


Really not that concerned. They are not full of question marks. Their LD is a question, but not really even a huge one. It's going to be Zboril, Vaakanainan, and one of the guys from the right side.

I would honestly rather have john moore out there over Chara at this point. The gap between Grz and Krug is not a huge as you would think.
Oct. 19, 2020 at 4:15 p.m.
#29
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 21,682
Likes: 12,028
Quoting: Propeller09
I agree for the most part, however if I am Detroit Debrusk, Studnicka and a 1st might get the conversation going. Mantha isn't young young. Detroit is still at least 3 years away. Mantha would be approaching 30... those big bodies don't always hold up that long...


I think you have to trade him before he gets old is an awful reason to trade a player. No player has won a cup being 30 or older. Right? Now Look at Arizona that is what they have been doing for years and they made their first trip to the playoffs is 7 years and have only made it past the 1st round once.
Oct. 19, 2020 at 4:34 p.m.
#30
HabsFan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 5,448
Likes: 933
Quoting: Propeller09
They did, Grzelcyk. He is very good offensively. Was always behind Krug and still put up decent offensive numbers in limited time and opportunity.

Neat fact: Grzelcyk had 38pts at BU while McAvoy's high pt total was 26. (he played two more years...)


Than need to sign Hoffman and that's it!
Oct. 19, 2020 at 6:38 p.m.
#31
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
Quoting: aedoran
I think you have to trade him before he gets old is an awful reason to trade a player. No player has won a cup being 30 or older. Right? Now Look at Arizona that is what they have been doing for years and they made their first trip to the playoffs is 7 years and have only made it past the 1st round once.


I am not saying that is the only reason to trade him. I am saying Detroit is going to be bad for at least 2-3 years, probably longer if we are being honest. He is 26 and on his last year of RFA, so I assume he wants 1 year or 7-8. If you do one you can dump him at deadline, but you might be in the wildcard hunt enough to not really do be in a position to do that. can't tell me Detroit fans we be ok with a sell off if they are 4pts out of a wild card.

point being, they could get locked in with him to the point where 33 or 34 year old mantha isn't worth the contract. Much like a Getzlaf or Perry. He has an injury history. Debrusk is not horrible himself. I think Mantha if healthy is 30-35 whereas Debrusk is 25 or so goals.

Also - that "awful" reason is legitimately the reason why teams don't resign always re-sign their players. The Bruins didn't think 34 year old Krug was going to be worth 6.5m. The Blues didn't think 35+ year old Peitrangelo was going to be worth 9m.

I don't think Arizona has been doing that:
A) they have drafter horribly until the last few years.
B) OEL has literally been their best player for a decade. They should have traded him. Now he isn't worth his 8.25m Cap hit and they can't get anything close to value for him. That actually perfectly makes my point.
C) They keep adding, not selling, I can't think of a sell. They bought Hall, Kessel...

However the blackhawks did sell at the right time with Ladd, Buflygien, and others. Not so much seabrook.
aedoran liked this.
Oct. 20, 2020 at 1:16 a.m.
#32
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 21,682
Likes: 12,028
Quoting: Propeller09
I am not saying that is the only reason to trade him. I am saying Detroit is going to be bad for at least 2-3 years, probably longer if we are being honest. He is 26 and on his last year of RFA, so I assume he wants 1 year or 7-8. If you do one you can dump him at deadline, but you might be in the wildcard hunt enough to not really do be in a position to do that. can't tell me Detroit fans we be ok with a sell off if they are 4pts out of a wild card.

point being, they could get locked in with him to the point where 33 or 34 year old mantha isn't worth the contract. Much like a Getzlaf or Perry. He has an injury history. Debrusk is not horrible himself. I think Mantha if healthy is 30-35 whereas Debrusk is 25 or so goals.

Also - that "awful" reason is legitimately the reason why teams don't resign always re-sign their players. The Bruins didn't think 34 year old Krug was going to be worth 6.5m. The Blues didn't think 35+ year old Peitrangelo was going to be worth 9m.

I don't think Arizona has been doing that:
A) they have drafter horribly until the last few years.
B) OEL has literally been their best player for a decade. They should have traded him. Now he isn't worth his 8.25m Cap hit and they can't get anything close to value for him. That actually perfectly makes my point.
C) They keep adding, not selling, I can't think of a sell. They bought Hall, Kessel...

However the blackhawks did sell at the right time with Ladd, Buflygien, and others. Not so much seabrook.


I get what you are saying but Detroit feels that they haven't seen anything near Mantha's potential and since he is the most talented player the Wing's have I don't see him going anywhere for a while. If they were thinking of trading him would they let him buy a house in Detroit? They wouldn't be able to sign another decent free agent for years to come. The one thing you didn't factor in Mantha his French Canadian and Montreal fans love their home town boys.

The cap that won't increase more than $1M in an offseason until The NHL's HRR tops $4B for consecutive seasons. That most likely won't happen until the new tv deal is in place in 2021-22 so the 1st significant increase in cap will be in 2023-24. I like Krug and at the start of the season I thought it would be nice to have him in Detroit but honestly I think both Detroit and Boston dodged a bullet there. But comparing Mantha to Krug her come on a 26yr old RFA and a 29yr defenseman who more than likely just signed his last NHL contract.

Take at the link below and tell me Arizona hasn't been doing that,

Drafted by Arizona
Oct. 20, 2020 at 8:20 a.m.
#33
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
Quoting: aedoran
I get what you are saying but Detroit feels that they haven't seen anything near Mantha's potential and since he is the most talented player the Wing's have I don't see him going anywhere for a while. If they were thinking of trading him would they let him buy a house in Detroit? They wouldn't be able to sign another decent free agent for years to come. The one thing you didn't factor in Mantha his French Canadian and Montreal fans love their home town boys.

The cap that won't increase more than $1M in an offseason until The NHL's HRR tops $4B for consecutive seasons. That most likely won't happen until the new tv deal is in place in 2021-22 so the 1st significant increase in cap will be in 2023-24. I like Krug and at the start of the season I thought it would be nice to have him in Detroit but honestly I think both Detroit and Boston dodged a bullet there. But comparing Mantha to Krug her come on a 26yr old RFA and a 29yr defenseman who more than likely just signed his last NHL contract.

Take at the link below and tell me Arizona hasn't been doing that,

Drafted by Arizona


I hate doing these because I think the organization plays a huge part in their development but... That just shows me AZ has not been doing that. They haven't drafted anyone worth trading...
Chycrhun and Keller are good, but 2009 - 2016 there is whole lot of nothing.

2016 the year which they drafter Keller and Chychrun, along with 2015 they sold high in the past on Perlini, Turris, but they are bad. I guess my point is Mantha is good and would get a huge return. Arizona hasn't done that because their players stink (with the exception of 2016 Draft), and they sold off their 1st three rounds to make a run this year.

As I said, I hate doing this because it's still early but... *Hayton, chychrun and ketter are the only one with to play in NHL since being drafted in 2016 and hayton has 5 games. 1 out of 27 guys drafted since 2016 - not counting this recent draft cause, no games..
2018 - Quinn Hughes over Barret Hayton*
2017 - Henri Jokiharu over Pierre oliver josesph
2016 - They nailed.
2015 - At #3 they took the worst player in top 10 (marner, provorov, werenski, meier, raantanan) make AZ a legit team.

I hate doing these because.. They draft Marner or Rantanan and actually get better they don't get the same picks. Draft order changes, team needs change, FA signings change....

Point being if they trade mantha to trade him, I Agree it's a terrible idea. If they land a good young NHL player with a higher than he is currently performing at player (debrusk) a young "Sure thing" prospect who is 20-21 and a 1st rd pick. That is a decent haul.

It's not trading Domi for Galchyenchuk.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll