SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Total rebuild because why not

Created by: justaBoss
Team: 2020-21 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 19, 2020
Published: Oct. 19, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$6,500,000
1$874,125
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Mittelstadt, Casey [RFA Rights]
  2. Reinhart, Sam [RFA Rights]
  3. Ristolainen, Rasmus
  4. 2021 1st round pick (BUF)
2.
3.
4.
CHI
  1. Little, Bryan
  2. Niku, Sami [RFA Rights]
  3. 2022 1st round pick (WPG)
5.
CHI
  1. 2021 2nd round pick (BOS)
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (BOS)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$71,689,343$1,090,244$4,200,000$9,810,657
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C
UFA - 1
$874,125$874,125
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$562,500$562,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$5,291,667$5,291,667
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$775,000$775,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 19, 2020 at 11:35 p.m.
#26
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 15,738
Likes: 6,995
Quoting: SlickWilly
Especially for a low income team like the Jets. For example, in 2019, their operating income was -7% and had the 5th lowest revenue in the entire league. Do you think with having to play some of their young star players soon and signing bonuses becoming all the rage, they wouldnt trade a big money hole like Little for a low paid player like Keith, making half as much money as Little over the next 3 years? These things matter to presidents and CEOs


Not when your owner is the richest in the NHL. Show me some proof where Winnipeg has side said they will make stupid trades to save actual dollars.
Oct. 19, 2020 at 11:36 p.m.
#27
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 2,165
Quoting: Windjammer
Not when your owner is the richest in the NHL. Show me some proof where Winnipeg has side said they will make stupid trades to save actual dollars.


Obviously he never said that. But when their income on the year was negative and they cant even break the 1st round, the guys upstairs probably start to get a little worried
Oct. 19, 2020 at 11:46 p.m.
#28
Thread Starter
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
Quoting: Windjammer
Making a stupid panic move because you think something might happen in a year or two is just downright silly. There is a far greater chance that little retires than comes back. How does replacing Little's cap hit with a worse cap hit make the situation better for Winnipeg? Did you even think of that?

Giving up a first to take acquire Keith is crazy because:
1. Keith isn't worth anywhere float to a first
2. The Jets have zero need for Keith
3. He's not going to waive to go to Winnipeg.


It's not a panic decision to be prepared for potentially something happening in the future. If anything, it's more of a foresight than a needless panic. Keith and Little's cap hits are pretty much equal, but Keith has one year less on his contract and he's actually able to play. Also...

1) Keith alone is not worth a 1st, but with Little coming back I say it's justified.
2) WPG has a need for a D, and looking at their roster it wouldn't hurt at all if he had some experience to boot.
3) He's literally from Winnipeg. I think the likelihood of him waiving his NMC is much higher than staying for the rest of his years in a rebuilding team.

Quoting: Windjammer
Winnipeg doesn't care about actual money. Cap hit is all that matters.


Also this is probably the most naive take I've ever seen on this site. Literally the whole league had to make a new CBA because teams and owners were worried about the actual money. The actual money matters as much as the cap does for at least half of the league now, or how would you explain for example CBJ clearing up $14M of cap space in one day without signing any significant players from the free agency...
Oct. 19, 2020 at 11:52 p.m.
#29
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 419
Quoting: justaBoss
Why? Toews would instantly become your 1C... A playoff experienced one. Something CGY very much needs.
While completely stripping the team of it's future. Toews is a great player but that contract is not very good and we sure as hell would not be giving up a 23 year old top 4 defenseman with top pairing potential, our #2 prospect, our next #1 pick and Sam Bennett for a 32 year Toews at 10.5m, a contract we wouldn't be able to afford anyways.
Oct. 19, 2020 at 11:55 p.m.
#30
Thread Starter
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
Quoting: Lunatik
While completely stripping the team of it's future. Toews is a great player but that contract is not very good and we sure as hell would not be giving up a 23 year old top 4 defenseman with top pairing potential, our #2 prospect, our next #1 pick and Sam Bennett for a 32 year Toews at 10.5m, a contract we wouldn't be able to afford anyways.


What'd you consider an appropriate return then? I do think Toews to CGY has some merit behind it terms of needs and all, and it's not like the guy moving too cheap either...
Oct. 20, 2020 at 12:18 a.m.
#31
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 419
Quoting: justaBoss
What'd you consider an appropriate return then? I do think Toews to CGY has some merit behind it terms of needs and all, and it's not like the guy moving too cheap either...

Nothing remotely close to what would be close to the equivalent of 4 first rounders that you suggested. That is nothing short of laughable.

Well in a rebuild type trade the Flames aren't the right team because we need to move out nearly as much salary as we bring in. We would need the Hawks to eat a significant percentage of salary and Backlund + a 1st would need to be the starting point.
Oct. 20, 2020 at 6:39 a.m.
#32
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,505
Likes: 4,566
Boston had no use for Durban as we already have 6 goalies under contract
Oct. 20, 2020 at 9:45 a.m.
#33
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 15,738
Likes: 6,995
Quoting: justaBoss
It's not a panic decision to be prepared for potentially something happening in the future. If anything, it's more of a foresight than a needless panic. Keith and Little's cap hits are pretty much equal, but Keith has one year less on his contract and he's actually able to play. Also...

1) Keith alone is not worth a 1st, but with Little coming back I say it's justified.
2) WPG has a need for a D, and looking at their roster it wouldn't hurt at all if he had some experience to boot.
3) He's literally from Winnipeg. I think the likelihood of him waiving his NMC is much higher than staying for the rest of his years in a rebuilding team.



Also this is probably the most naive take I've ever seen on this site. Literally the whole league had to make a new CBA because teams and owners were worried about the actual money. The actual money matters as much as the cap does for at least half of the league now, or how would you explain for example CBJ clearing up $14M of cap space in one day without signing any significant players from the free agency...


Really it's naive to think that teams will deliberately screw themselves with an unnecessary move. Have you ever heard of insurance? Little's contract is insured. The Jets are out no money if he doesn't play. The contract is covered by insurance. To think that billionaire owners will throw away money and assets by making a brain dead move is very silly. They didn't get to be billionaires by panicking and making incredibly stupid decisions.

You also know nothing about Keith obviously. He was born in Winnipeg, but moved away when he was one and spent his early life on Ontario. So, he's not waiving to go to a city he had no allegiance to.

Winnipeg can't afford to waste $ 5.5 mil of cap space on a ridiculously old defenseman they have zero need for.

Fortunately, this is all for fun and we won't have to worry about this kind of foolishness in real life.
Oct. 20, 2020 at 12:43 p.m.
#34
Flames
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 343
Thats not a good trade at all for Calgary.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll