SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The only TYPES of Marner or Nylander trades that make sense

Created by: Hidalgo
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 4, 2020
Published: Dec. 4, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
READ description:

This is all hypothetical. I don’t want Toronto to trade either guy and I don’t think they’re gonna any time soon.

Before people say that these trades make no sense or don’t get accepted, that’s not the point. This is primarily to show leafs fans the types of trades I personally think Toronto would make if they ever wanted to trade MM or WM. Nylander is a top 4 D+Top 9 FWD, Marner a top 4 D, Top 9 FWD and second tier prospect. Also, they’d prob want to fill out the other positions in this case hence the FA signings.

Yes, these are prob overpayments on the other teams behalf’s, but that’s the reason they aren’t getting traded, it’d take a big overpayment or a situation where one has to be moved for it to happen.

Again, this is for leafs fans, so Carolina fans, don’t sue me.
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$4,000,000
Trades
1.
2.
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$76,560,208$0$20,000$4,939,792
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,645,000$1,645,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$763,333$763,333 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,487,500$1,487,500
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,025,000$4,025,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$874,125$874,125
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 4, 2020 at 1:24 a.m.
#1
Young Jefe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 82
Likes: 3
Sorry to break this to you but y'all aint getting rid of that mitch contract unless you throw in 3rd overall pick selection.
Dec. 4, 2020 at 1:26 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Hidalgo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 481
Likes: 223
Quoting: YoungJefe
Sorry to break this to you but y'all aint getting rid of that mitch contract unless you throw in 3rd overall pick selection.


And like I said In the description, I’m not trying to move it. They really don’t need to. Also I was not aware the draft lottery already happened for next year, that’s very exciting tho.
Dec. 4, 2020 at 1:38 a.m.
#3
Young Jefe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 82
Likes: 3
Quoting: Hidalgo
And like I said In the description, I’m not trying to move it. They really don’t need to. Also I was not aware the draft lottery already happened for next year, that’s very exciting tho.


Relax you know I meant 3rd round. Nice rebuttle tho picking out grammar mistakes I like it. Maybe ill use it too if I am indeed proven wrong.
Dec. 4, 2020 at 1:45 a.m.
#4
Hockey Fan13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,938
Likes: 2,499
I guess I read your preface to this, but I don't get it.
Why would the Wild or any other team pay that for Marner?
Dec. 4, 2020 at 1:46 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Hidalgo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 481
Likes: 223
Quoting: YoungJefe
Relax you know I meant 3rd round. Nice rebuttle tho picking out grammar mistakes I like it. Maybe ill use it too if I am indeed proven wrong.


How was I supposed to know you meant 3rd round? Im not trying to give you a hard time thats just a random thing for me to have to interpret. But no, the leafs would not have to give up a 3rd to move Marner lol.
DartGuy86 and Islesforthecup liked this.
Dec. 4, 2020 at 1:48 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Hidalgo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 481
Likes: 223
Quoting: OutCold13
I guess I read your preface to this, but I don't get it.
Why would the Wild or any other team pay that for Marner?


I'm not saying Minnesota would, I just am saying that Toronto would have no incentive to move him otherwise. Whether or not his deal is good, he's of huge value to Toronto, so it'd take a super practical roster move for them to move him. Otherwise they'd just make the rest of the roster work around it.
OutCold13 and DartGuy86 liked this.
Dec. 4, 2020 at 1:53 a.m.
#7
Hockey Fan13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,938
Likes: 2,499
Quoting: Hidalgo
I'm not saying Minnesota would, I just am saying that Toronto would have no incentive to move him otherwise. Whether or not his deal is good, he's of huge value to Toronto, so it'd take a super practical roster move for them to move him. Otherwise they'd just make the rest of the roster work around it.


Out of curiosity, and maybe Jets pass cause Marner costs too much, Laine for Marner, does it work and if not what needs adding?
Dec. 4, 2020 at 1:53 a.m.
#8
Young Jefe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 82
Likes: 3
Quoting: Hidalgo
I'm not saying Minnesota would, I just am saying that Toronto would have no incentive to move him otherwise. Whether or not his deal is good, he's of huge value to Toronto, so it'd take a super practical roster move for them to move him. Otherwise they'd just make the rest of the roster work around it.


Its hard to make a roster work around 4 players who are making 50 million a year between them. Even if your the leafs and you do up front contracts.
Dec. 4, 2020 at 1:58 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Hidalgo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 481
Likes: 223
Quoting: YoungJefe
Its hard to make a roster work around 4 players who are making 50 million a year between them. Even if your the leafs and you do up front contracts.


But they've done that, man. Thats the whole purpose of my post, they don't need to trade Marner or Nylander or any top player for that matter. Theres a huge misconception on cap friendly particularly that Marner and Nylander have no value and that Toronto needs to move them. They don't, and they're not going to unless they make a super sensible move similar to the ones I've posted. This offseason proved that they can still have those contracts and improve their team. And that's not exclusive to Toronto, teams can improve even if they have bad or expensive contracts, you just have to be creative.
DartGuy86 liked this.
Dec. 4, 2020 at 2:04 a.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Hidalgo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 481
Likes: 223
Quoting: OutCold13
Out of curiosity, and maybe Jets pass cause Marner costs too much, Laine for Marner, does it work and if not what needs adding?


I think thats just one of those moves that doesn't make sense for either team. Toronto would want Winnipeg to add because they're giving up the better player, Winnipeg would want Toronto to add because Laine probably is more worthy of his cap hit. I think teams are going to start shying away from 1 for 1 star trades, and it'll be more multi player deals that are relatively equal in cap and address each teams need. For example, something like.

Laine, Demelo, Roslovic for Marner, Holl, Kerfoot, 3rd. Idk if the value is fair there but thats just kinda a guess based on needs.
OutCold13 liked this.
Dec. 4, 2020 at 2:07 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,612
Likes: 3,523
I know this is a hypothetical for Leafs fans, but neither guy returns that much if traded.
Hidalgo and Lightman13 liked this.
Dec. 4, 2020 at 2:10 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Hidalgo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 481
Likes: 223
Quoting: Caerii
I know this is a hypothetical for Leafs fans, but neither guy returns that much if traded.


I don't necessarily disagree with that, but I think that's why neither have been or will be traded
Dec. 4, 2020 at 3:09 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 1,689
I personally think it should be for 2-3 forwards, this group isn't deep enough, I think the d has a chance to be good.
Hidalgo liked this.
Dec. 4, 2020 at 3:11 a.m.
#14
Young Jefe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 82
Likes: 3
Quoting: Hidalgo
How was I supposed to know you meant 3rd round? Im not trying to give you a hard time thats just a random thing for me to have to interpret. But no, the leafs would not have to give up a 3rd to move Marner lol.


three words
1. contract
2. too
3, big
Dec. 4, 2020 at 3:15 a.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Hidalgo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 481
Likes: 223
Quoting: Theozler
I personally think it should be for 2-3 forwards, this group isn't deep enough, I think the d has a chance to be good.


I'd agree with that, I think a 2F/1D would be ideal. As much as they get ripped on for their defence, I actually feel like on paper their defensive depth is better than forward depth now. Its team defence that needs work
Theozler liked this.
Dec. 4, 2020 at 3:21 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 1,689
Quoting: Hidalgo
I'd agree with that, I think a 2F/1D would be ideal. As much as they get ripped on for their defence, I actually feel like on paper their defensive depth is better than forward depth now. Its team defence that needs work


The Brodie signing set them up pretty well imo and their younger guys could develop so I'd be a bit !ore patient with the, the potential "century" line would have me very concerned come playoffs.
DartGuy86 liked this.
Dec. 4, 2020 at 4:34 a.m.
#17
backcheck>paycheck
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 416
Likes: 194
Quoting: YoungJefe
Sorry to break this to you but y'all aint getting rid of that mitch contract unless you throw in 3rd overall pick selection.


BAHAHAHAH
Dec. 4, 2020 at 4:39 a.m.
#18
backcheck>paycheck
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 416
Likes: 194
Quoting: Hidalgo
I think thats just one of those moves that doesn't make sense for either team. Toronto would want Winnipeg to add because they're giving up the better player, Winnipeg would want Toronto to add because Laine probably is more worthy of his cap hit. I think teams are going to start shying away from 1 for 1 star trades, and it'll be more multi player deals that are relatively equal in cap and address each teams need. For example, something like.

Laine, Demelo, Roslovic for Marner, Holl, Kerfoot, 3rd. Idk if the value is fair there but thats just kinda a guess based on needs.


Even then it wouldn't make much sense for the leafs to trade a natural-born playmaker for another goal-scorer when we have AM and JT. Laine just wouldnt be a good fit.
Hidalgo liked this.
Dec. 4, 2020 at 10:02 a.m.
#19
Patient gm
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,874
Likes: 1,001
in your premise you say nylander or marner would be traded for gross overpayment or necessity. Well this fits the gross overpayment. what would the necessity trade value be like? cause it would be far less.
Dec. 4, 2020 at 12:56 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Hidalgo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 481
Likes: 223
Quoting: Lightman13
in your premise you say nylander or marner would be traded for gross overpayment or necessity. Well this fits the gross overpayment. what would the necessity trade value be like? cause it would be far less.


It’s too tough to say honestly because that’d prob be a couple years down the line where you’d have more of an idea of what each player is and what the cap situation is
Lightman13 liked this.
Dec. 7, 2020 at 11:08 a.m.
#21
Patient gm
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,874
Likes: 1,001
Quoting: Hidalgo
It’s too tough to say honestly because that’d prob be a couple years down the line where you’d have more of an idea of what each player is and what the cap situation is


It’s interesting seeing people doing tampa threads right now because Tampa will be making moves out of necessity and the values are all over the place.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll