SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

How much will TBL retain

Created by: Rob32sjsharks
Team: 2020-21 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 14, 2020
Published: Dec. 14, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
The more I watch Johnson highlights the more I feel
He plays similar to Pavelski but not quite as good
For example most of his goals are on one timers off passes from the D, backhand shots of rebounds and scrambles in front of the net or Tips from point shots.
With two D man like Burns and Karlsson I feel Johnson can be utilized almost exactly how we did with Pav’s and he can be very successful here, and that should be enticing for him to rebound his career and why he accepts a trade to San Jose despite California’s high tax rate.
The key is how much is Tampa willing to retain to get rid of him!!! I have 2 mil here is it more or less?
At 3 mil for the next 4 years I think he is a very positive value.
Trades
SJS
  1. Johnson, Tyler ($2,000,000 retained)
TBL
  1. Ibragimov, Timur
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (SJS)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$74,203,333$0$577,500$7,296,667
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RW, C, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,900,000$1,900,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$768,333$768,333 (Performance Bonus$65,000$65K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,166,667$2,166,667
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RD
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$725,000$725,000
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 14, 2020 at 2:33 p.m.
#1
blues are 1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 258
Likes: 28
ok
Dec. 14, 2020 at 2:34 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,213
Likes: 744
probs none cuz they cant afford to
imawesome and blu liked this.
Dec. 14, 2020 at 2:34 p.m.
#3
blues are 1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 258
Likes: 28
Quoting: Ryancnbb
probs none cuz they cant afford to


fact
Ryancnbb and imawesome liked this.
Dec. 14, 2020 at 2:40 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 3,509
Quoting: Ryancnbb
probs none cuz they cant afford to

Maybe a third team does the retention and receives the compensation? But 2M x 4 years would cost a bit.
Ryancnbb liked this.
Dec. 14, 2020 at 2:51 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 4,719
Quoting: BStinson
Maybe a third team does the retention and receives the compensation? But 2M x 4 years would cost a bit.


True and if a 3rd team like Detroit was involved Tampa would have to give up a 1st, the sharks give up a 3rd and a b level prospect and everyone wins then but that is a tall order.

Sharks get Johnson at 3 mil a year For a 3rd rounder and a decent prospect

Detroit -or team to be named later- gets a B level prospect 2 3rd’s and a 1st for losing 2 mil cap space the next 4 years

Tampa gets 5 mil in cap space to sign Anthony. But gives up a 1st and a 3rd
Ryancnbb liked this.
Dec. 14, 2020 at 2:53 p.m.
#6
CELEBRINI IS A SHARK
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,144
Likes: 12,856
Edited Dec. 14, 2020 at 3:02 p.m.
This trade doesn’t really help the sharks or lightning. What would be better is firstly giving Tampa the full cap relief since we can fit a the full brunt of his contract. And secondly we take the full incentive for taking on the full cap - and we still get a player to use on our third line to improve our depth.
This trade doesn’t help either team the way it could.

Tampa would likely prefer to get the contracts off the books and the sharks should rather acquire quality assets for doing so

Tampa is in the worst cap situation ever atleast off the top of my head in the NHL. They need to relieve like 10+ mil to be where they want
Rob32sjsharks liked this.
Dec. 14, 2020 at 2:57 p.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,892
Likes: 3,372
The whole point of trading Johnson is to free up Cap space so they can sign their RFAs. Tampa will likely need to trade Killorn too. But JBB isn't retaining anything.
yikes liked this.
Dec. 14, 2020 at 3:08 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 4,719
Quoting: Letter_Kenny
The whole point of trading Johnson is to free up Cap space so they can sign their RFAs. Tampa will likely need to trade Killorn too. But JBB isn't retaining anything.


Yea I kinda feel you there but with no one picking him up for free off waivers it’s either retain on him or trade away a plethora of picks.
Either way I’m on if we had to pick up Johnson at full 5mil we would have to trade Sorenson and only have 22 on our active roster, but it’s doable, but then Tampa would have 2 1sts comming our way and that feels like a steal of a deal and makes 3 straight years sharks get their firsts. For taking on a player and giving up Goodrow.
Dec. 14, 2020 at 3:16 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 4,719
Quoting: yikes
This trade doesn’t really help the sharks or lightning. What would be better is firstly giving Tampa the full cap relief since we can fit a the full brunt of his contract. And secondly we take the full incentive for taking on the full cap - and we still get a player to use on our third line to improve our depth.
This trade doesn’t help either team the way it could.

Tampa would likely prefer to get the contracts off the books and the sharks should rather acquire quality assets for doing so

Tampa is in the worst cap situation ever atleast off the top of my head in the NHL. They need to relieve like 10+ mil to be where they want



Your right, now do we help them out for a bounty or do we go villain and offer sheet Anthony for 2 years 4.5 and try and swipe their top 2 C out from under them???

Or get super crafty talk another GM in offer sheeting Anthony then we swoop in and try and pluck Killorn or Johnson for a bag of picks so they can resign Anthony.

Or do we start camp as is see how the kids play then if needed pick up a guy like sheary or Duclair or Atheneou.
Dec. 14, 2020 at 3:17 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 4,719
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Your right, now do we help them out for a bounty or do we go villain and offer sheet Anthony for 2 years 4.5 and try and swipe their top 2 C out from under them???

Or get super crafty talk another GM in offer sheeting Anthony then we swoop in and try and pluck Killorn or Johnson for a bag of picks so they can resign Anthony.

Or do we start camp as is see how the kids play then if needed pick up a guy like sheary or Duclair or Atheneou.


I need hockey I am so bored right now.
Burnzie8_88_4Cup liked this.
Dec. 14, 2020 at 4:55 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 160
Likes: 47
I think a big reason Doug has done so little this off season is that he is unwilling to take on any significant cap hits with term. Looking forward, Hertl and Ferraro will need new contracts in 2022. The cap won’t be going up and there are no big contracts coming off the Sharks payroll. If he takes someone like TJ, he paints himself into a Tampa like corner in the future. My guess is he’s trying to add a forward with a contract that runs one or two years and a trade like this is a non-starter.
Dec. 14, 2020 at 5:04 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 4,719
Quoting: ASharksFan
I think a big reason Doug has done so little this off season is that he is unwilling to take on any significant cap hits with term. Looking forward, Hertl and Ferraro will need new contracts in 2022. The cap won’t be going up and there are no big contracts coming off the Sharks payroll. If he takes someone like TJ, he paints himself into a Tampa like corner in the future. My guess is he’s trying to add a forward with a contract that runs one or two years and a trade like this is a non-starter.


That’s what I thought and I posted a trade of Kane for Pavelski a couple days ago and got lambasted.
My thought we lose 10-15 goals a season between the 2 but Pavs contract is up In 2 years helps us bridge the gap when it comes up and gives us back some leadership we lost.
Dec. 14, 2020 at 5:22 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 160
Likes: 47
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
That’s what I thought and I posted a trade of Kane for Pavelski a couple days ago and got lambasted.
My thought we lose 10-15 goals a season between the 2 but Pavs contract is up In 2 years helps us bridge the gap when it comes up and gives us back some leadership we lost.


I love Pavs. I even made sure I was at the Dallas game last year so I could cheer for his return to the tank. However, we all know that contract isn’t going to end well just like we knew Marleau’s contract with Toronto wasn’t going to end well. I think Doug is trying to sign someone like Granlund to a short term deal. Plus, if we are trading with Tampa it should be for Killorn not TJ.
Dec. 14, 2020 at 11:52 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 4,719
Quoting: ASharksFan
I love Pavs. I even made sure I was at the Dallas game last year so I could cheer for his return to the tank. However, we all know that contract isn’t going to end well just like we knew Marleau’s contract with Toronto wasn’t going to end well. I think Doug is trying to sign someone like Granlund to a short term deal. Plus, if we are trading with Tampa it should be for Killorn not TJ.


TJ is a better fit though, I know I sound crazy but TJ would fit our system and flourish I see him being a 20+ goal 45 point player most of the final years if he is here, and the Pavelski Kane trade is very very lopsided and favors Dallas but the ability to have 1 contract for a large amount come off the books when 3+!players will Need raises is my sole reason for posting the trade idea.
Dec. 15, 2020 at 1:38 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,767
Likes: 529
Quoting: ASharksFan
I think a big reason Doug has done so little this off season is that he is unwilling to take on any significant cap hits with term. Looking forward, Hertl and Ferraro will need new contracts in 2022. The cap won’t be going up and there are no big contracts coming off the Sharks payroll. If he takes someone like TJ, he paints himself into a Tampa like corner in the future. My guess is he’s trying to add a forward with a contract that runs one or two years and a trade like this is a non-starter.


I agree that I think DW is going to be patient, at least early, like Timo's rookie year. We have a lot of young unknowns, & I think he wants to see which ones step up & are going to be a part of the future going forward.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll