@villenash is this trade more fair?

Well if you're already trading away Bouchard, I think NSH would be more interested in including him in an Ellis deal -- but I don't think EDM should trade Bouchard in the first.

I like Holloway + 1st -- not sure why it's a 2022, but that's ok for now. Larsson doesn't add any real value, more of a cap dump that won't be resigned by NSH most likely and then Kemp again. I mean, there are some pieces there (Holloway + 1st) that I like, but the rest seems like filler (which is sometimes needed for moving bigger $$ contracts). Maybe NSH could flip Larsson for a 3rd or something at the deadline as well? But if NSH gets a lottery pick and drafts a defenseman then they may be in a better place with Holloway + one of the top D prospects of the 2021 draft + 1st in 2022 in the end (if they're going for a rebuild)

Holloway - Tomasino - Tolvanen could be a good line in the future for NSH.

But if NSH is in a full-on rebuild, then maybe there is a deal that could be made around Holloway + Bouchard (if he were actually made available) + picks for Ellis + Arvidsson or something ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

James Neal is a player no team really wants and he's on a very bad contract that has 2 seasons more AFTER this one. So, Bouchard and Neal might get you Hogberg and a 3rd, but you'd need to add another significant piece if you want Dadonov included.

I can’t see Edmonton making these moves. Holloway and Bouchard are big pieces and they will both be playing next year. Edmonton needs a substantial goalie not hogberg.