SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Reinhart will be a Canuck

Created by: Mediumyeet
Team: 2021-22 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: May 12, 2021
Published: May 12, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
If either Beagle or Roussell goes LTIR or are traded then they can sign a better dman. Could also bury both of them in the minors and sign a decent dman.

Can also buyout Holtby or try to find another trade destination like New Jersey if Seattle won't take him.

Point is they can make a Reinhart addition and make the cap still work with most of their current roster.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$6,500,000
5$8,500,000
2$5,000,000
1$900,000
1$900,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,750,000
1$1,000,000
1$900,000
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. Reinhart, Sam [RFA Rights]
BUF
  1. Gadjovich, Jonah
  2. McDonough, Aidan [Reserve List]
  3. 2021 1st round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
Top 7 pick. Gives Buffalo two picks inside the top 7 this year.
2.
VAN
SEA
  1. Holtby, Braden
  2. 2022 4th round pick (VAN)
Buyouts
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the VAN
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$80,150,659$648,780$1,050,000$1,349,341
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$900,000$900,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,225,000$1,225,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$825,000$825,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,950,000$5,950,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 3
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$900,000$900,000
LD
UFA - 1
$900,000$900,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$842,500$842,500 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$786,111$786,111 ($0$0$0$0)
G
RFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$811,667$811,667 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
G
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 12, 2021 at 9:52 p.m.
#1
PDG over PDO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 5,039
Likes: 4,096
Depending on who is available when we draft i 100% do that trade
May 12, 2021 at 9:53 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Buffalo Accepts
May 12, 2021 at 10:02 p.m.
#3
dan16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Im not sure the Canucks will want to trade a lottery pick. I guess we have to see, would be a good upgrade for sure.
May 12, 2021 at 10:20 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,616
Likes: 1,319
Quoting: theleano1
Depending on who is available when we draft i 100% do that trade


Quoting: dan16
Im not sure the Canucks will want to trade a lottery pick. I guess we have to see, would be a good upgrade for sure.


I'd honestly give up the pick regardless of where it's at. If it's near the top maybe you can remove Gadjovich or McDonagh from the deal. Ideally for the nucks it'd just be the pick straight up for Reinhart
May 12, 2021 at 10:25 p.m.
#5
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,223
Likes: 9,025
The pick isnt interesting, this draft sucks. Vancouver has pieces but this aint it
sabres89 liked this.
May 12, 2021 at 10:26 p.m.
#6
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
That is a meh return for Reinhart.
sabres89 liked this.
May 12, 2021 at 10:30 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 7,990
Likes: 4,210
Doubt it. With Boeser needing a new contract the year after, and Miller, Horvat, and Hoglander a year after, I doubt they will try and get someone like him. I see them going after Erik Haula though for more depth, and faceoff wins.
May 12, 2021 at 10:33 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,616
Likes: 1,319
Quoting: Shibbal18
The pick isnt interesting, this draft sucks. Vancouver has pieces but this aint it


Quoting: justaBoss
That is a meh return for Reinhart.


A top pick is still very valuable in this draft. Buffalo could come out of the draft with Powers and Beniers or Johnston or something. I guarantee GMs still highly value those picks.
May 12, 2021 at 10:36 p.m.
#9
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
Quoting: Mediumyeet
A top pick is still very valuable in this draft. Buffalo could come out of the draft with Powers and Beniers or Johnston or something. I guarantee GMs still highly value those picks.


They will value a top10 goal scorer higher than a huge question mark pick in a bad draft year.

Maybe if it was a top10 2022 pick...just maybe.

It'd have to be like top5 in 2021 to make them slightly interested.
May 12, 2021 at 10:48 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,616
Likes: 1,319
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
Doubt it. With Boeser needing a new contract the year after, and Miller, Horvat, and Hoglander a year after, I doubt they will try and get someone like him. I see them going after Erik Haula though for more depth, and faceoff wins.


Benning is on the hot seat if he even makes it to next season. Playoffs are a must if he wants to keep his job and he knows it. I think he will take a swing at Reinhart. Signing a guy like Haula is what he will try to do if he can't land a big name IMO.
May 12, 2021 at 10:52 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,616
Likes: 1,319
Quoting: justaBoss
They will value a top10 goal scorer higher than a huge question mark pick in a bad draft year.

Maybe if it was a top10 2022 pick...just maybe.

It'd have to be like top5 in 2021 to make them slightly interested.


Reinhart might be top 10 in goals this year but don't kid yourself. Nobody thinks he is a top 10 goalscorer in the league. Also factor in the fact that he clearly wants out so they have to trade him this offseason or during the regular season.

Most goals he has scored in a season is 25 and most points is 65. Were talking about a really good player here but not an elite player.
May 12, 2021 at 11:00 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 7,990
Likes: 4,210
Quoting: Mediumyeet
Benning is on the hot seat if he even makes it to next season. Playoffs are a must if he wants to keep his job and he knows it. I think he will take a swing at Reinhart. Signing a guy like Haula is what he will try to do if he can't land a big name IMO.


Possibly, its just not a good plan in my opinion, as you will have to sign your other good players soon.
May 12, 2021 at 11:03 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,616
Likes: 1,319
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
Possibly, its just not a good plan in my opinion, as you will have to sign your other good players soon.


That's they type of thing GMs do when they're trying to save their job though. Long term outlook goes out the door. Plus they can always let Miller walk when his contract is up. He's going to be 30 and commanding big money if he keeps his play up for the remainder of his contract.
May 12, 2021 at 11:06 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 7,990
Likes: 4,210
Quoting: Mediumyeet
That's they type of thing GMs do when they're trying to save their job though. Long term outlook goes out the door. Plus they can always let Miller walk when his contract is up. He's going to be 30 and commanding big money if he keeps his play up for the remainder of his contract.


I guess.... he should be traded then at the deadline in two years. I don’t like it, but oh well.
May 12, 2021 at 11:08 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,616
Likes: 1,319
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
I guess.... he should be traded then at the deadline in two years. I don’t like it, but oh well.


Ya if they're not in playoff contention that season he will definitely be moved.
May 12, 2021 at 11:09 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 7,990
Likes: 4,210
Quoting: Mediumyeet
Ya if they're not in playoff contention that season he will definitely be moved.



Makes sense... they should get rid of Benning anyway. He sucks!
May 13, 2021 at 1:16 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 8,248
Likes: 6,236
Quoting: Shibbal18
The pick isnt interesting, this draft sucks. Vancouver has pieces but this aint it


This draft cant come fast enough. Its not a coincidence that people are very comfortable moving 21 firsts. I hope we dont move anybody until after the draft.
Shibbal18 liked this.
May 13, 2021 at 1:18 a.m.
#18
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
Quoting: Mediumyeet
Reinhart might be top 10 in goals this year but don't kid yourself. Nobody thinks he is a top 10 goalscorer in the league. Also factor in the fact that he clearly wants out so they have to trade him this offseason or during the regular season.

Most goals he has scored in a season is 25 and most points is 65. Were talking about a really good player here but not an elite player.


Doesn't matter. He was a top10 scorer in the league in the most dreadful team in ages this year.

I'm not saying he's a top10 scorer league wide, but his performance this year far exceeds some of the elite players, and he should get recognition for that.

Sabres have no reason to move the guy cheap. And they won't. In a draft where there are bound to be several Nail Yakupovs and Griffin Reinharts due to lack of scouting opportunities the stock and value of this year's picks are almost all time low.
May 13, 2021 at 1:25 a.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,616
Likes: 1,319
Quoting: justaBoss
Doesn't matter. He was a top10 scorer in the league in the most dreadful team in ages this year.

I'm not saying he's a top10 scorer league wide, but his performance this year far exceeds some of the elite players, and he should get recognition for that.

Sabres have no reason to move the guy cheap. And they won't. In a draft where there are bound to be several Nail Yakupovs and Griffin Reinharts due to lack of scouting opportunities the stock and value of this year's picks are almost all time low.


IMO a top 7 pick isn't moving someone for cheap. Can't cherry pick and say there's going to be yakupovs and Griffin Reinharts because of lack of scouting and not acknowledge that there can also be Petterssons and Makars. And they're not dealing from a position of strength here. They have an unhappy player without a contract that is going to be a UFA in 1 years time.

I'm giving him recognition. Top 10 picks almost never get moved for a player because they are valued so highly and I said that were talking about a 'very good' player here not an elite. I'd consider guys like Boeser or Nylander in the same category 'very good not elite'.

If all of the Canucks stars wanted to leave and it was looking like we had to start on another full rebuild and Boeser was in the same position as Reinhart you bet I'd highly considering a top 7 pick for him.
May 13, 2021 at 2:05 a.m.
#20
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
Quoting: Mediumyeet
IMO a top 7 pick isn't moving someone for cheap. Can't cherry pick and say there's going to be yakupovs and Griffin Reinharts because of lack of scouting and not acknowledge that there can also be Petterssons and Makars. And they're not dealing from a position of strength here. They have an unhappy player without a contract that is going to be a UFA in 1 years time.

I'm giving him recognition. Top 10 picks almost never get moved for a player because they are valued so highly and I said that were talking about a 'very good' player here not an elite. I'd consider guys like Boeser or Nylander in the same category 'very good not elite'.

If all of the Canucks stars wanted to leave and it was looking like we had to start on another full rebuild and Boeser was in the same position as Reinhart you bet I'd highly considering a top 7 pick for him.


Don't get me wrong, during a normal year that's a solid return. But on a very exceptional year in all wrong ways if I were BUF GM I would not risk it. I'd rather trade Reinhart for a prospect that is more proven, because the worst possible scenario for them is to have two picks in the top7 of this draft with both of them failing. Replace that pick with Podkolzin and a roster player and BUF will certainly listen. But I'm quite certain you wouldn't entertain the idea, exactly for the reasons mentioned earlier. It's much easier to just throw in picks that are completely lotto bound.

Also no one in this draft class have shown anything even close to what Pettersson and Makar respectively did during their junior careers.

You could say that the fact that in the U18 tournament just now all top players who were able to compete got absolutely destroyed by prospects one or two years from being draft eligible. And that's saying something about how weak this draft class is relative to others.

Contenders throwing first rounders for depth assets like Savard and Foligno tell exactly how GMs view the picks this year. Very, very risky business at the moment.
May 13, 2021 at 2:20 a.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,616
Likes: 1,319
Quoting: justaBoss
Don't get me wrong, during a normal year that's a solid return. But on a very exceptional year in all wrong ways if I were BUF GM I would not risk it. I'd rather trade Reinhart for a prospect that is more proven, because the worst possible scenario for them is to have two picks in the top7 of this draft with both of them failing. Replace that pick with Podkolzin and a roster player and BUF will certainly listen. But I'm quite certain you wouldn't entertain the idea, exactly for the reasons mentioned earlier. It's much easier to just throw in picks that are completely lotto bound.

Also no one in this draft class have shown anything even close to what Pettersson and Makar respectively did during their junior careers.

You could say that the fact that in the U18 tournament just now all top players who were able to compete got absolutely destroyed by prospects one or two years from being draft eligible. And that's saying something about how weak this draft class is relative to others.

Contenders throwing first rounders for depth assets like Savard and Foligno tell exactly how GMs view the picks this year. Very, very risky business at the moment.


To be fair Pettersson played div 2 in Sweden and was undersized with a lot of question marks and Makar played in the AJHL which in itself comes with a lot of question marks.

A lot of the guys in the top rankings didn't play in the U18, Eklund, powers, Beniers, Johnston and I might be missing a couple.

Contenders were trading what will be late 1sts where I agree the draft is a crapshoot but that's not really comparable to inside the top 7.

I wouldn't trade Podkolzin instead because the Canucks need to start winning to avoid a situation similar to Buffalo. I would rather have a guy ready to play than wait a year or two.

I get that there will be other offers out there and a package with a highend prospect could be more enticing but I that doesn't diminish the fact that trading a high pick is a valuable and competitive offer especially if you're adding to it.
May 13, 2021 at 4:11 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 1,386
VAN doesn't have the cap space for that type of deal.
May 13, 2021 at 4:15 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,616
Likes: 1,319
Quoting: PeterForsberg21
VAN doesn't have the cap space for that type of deal.


Ummm did you look at the cap situation above? They're under the cap and that's with Roussel and Beagle on the roster. Rumours are Beagle might be LTIRetired.

Also Holtby could be bought out if there is no trade partner for him or Seattle doesn't take him which would also be enough to make the cap work.
May 13, 2021 at 4:19 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 1,386
Quoting: Mediumyeet
Ummm did you look at the cap situation above? They're under the cap and that's with Roussel and Beagle on the roster. Rumours are Beagle might be LTIRetired.

Also Holtby could be bought out if there is no trade partner for him or Seattle doesn't take him which would also be enough to make the cap work.


VAN owner doesn't want to retain or use buyouts. The owner is being cheap don't see him being okay with buyouts.
May 13, 2021 at 4:25 p.m.
#25
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,616
Likes: 1,319
Quoting: PeterForsberg21
VAN owner doesn't want to retain or use buyouts. The owner is being cheap don't see him being okay with buyouts.


Eriksson buyout actually saves Aquilini money. Virtanen is definitely going to be either bought out or contract terminated with the legal issues.

Holtby buyout I could see him not being okay with which would force Benning to trade him in expansion or elsewhere by attaching assets.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll