SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ideal Wild game 3 change

Created by: Lightman13
Team: 2020-21 Minnesota Wild
Initial Creation Date: May 19, 2021
Published: May 19, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I would love to see turnover Johansson get the parise treatment. He has neither looked fast or good in about a month. Boldy seems like the right player to go along with fiala on a line. He would keep his game simple and have an m.o. to shoot and create more space for fiala.
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2022
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$78,120,257$0$1,057,500$3,379,743
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$925,000$925K)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,900,000$1,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,487,500$1,487,500
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,875,000$2,875,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,050,000$2,050,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,100,000$4,100,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$725,000$725,000
C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,538,462$7,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,575,000$7,575,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,666,667$3,666,667
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,166,667$4,166,667
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$725,000$725,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,450,000$3,450,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,538,462$7,538,462
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 19, 2021 at 10:06 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
This is correct. But I’d bet MoJo stays in.
Morzski liked this.
May 19, 2021 at 10:49 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 220
Likes: 140
Question, if another player got in the lineup before Parise does, is that the final straw and we've seen his last game in a Wild sweater? Or are we already at that point no matter how the playoffs go?
jnowariak liked this.
May 19, 2021 at 10:55 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Morzski
Question, if another player got in the lineup before Parise does, is that the final straw and we've seen his last game in a Wild sweater? Or are we already at that point no matter how the playoffs go?


I don’t think Parise has a contract with the Wild next year. Whether he comes in during this series or not, I think we are looking at mutual contract termination.
Lightman13 liked this.
May 19, 2021 at 11:08 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 8,212
Likes: 3,641
Quoting: Morzski
Question, if another player got in the lineup before Parise does, is that the final straw and we've seen his last game in a Wild sweater? Or are we already at that point no matter how the playoffs go?


Parise hasn't played well against VGK. I'd put him in if it was COL.

It's more about skillsets to me. None of Parise, MarJo, Bjugstad, or Bonino are suited to play next to Fiala, Kaprizov, or Zucc. The Greenway/JEE/Foligno line is working too well to split up. They don't have a center to push Hartman or Sturm to a wing with Fiala. The taxi squad isn't good for more than a 4th line filler. Mayhew is a very good AHL player, but not a NHL player.

This just leaves Boldy as the best untried option MN has to play with the skill wings.
Lightman13 liked this.
May 19, 2021 at 11:31 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 220
Likes: 140
Quoting: jnowariak
I don’t think Parise has a contract with the Wild next year. Whether he comes in during this series or not, I think we are looking at mutual contract termination.


I could see him basically saying, "trade me, buy me out, I don't care I just want to play" We'll see which way it goes this summer. I hope he's able to work hard in the off season and can be a producing 4th liner next year.

Quoting: wabit
Parise hasn't played well against VGK. I'd put him in if it was COL.

It's more about skillsets to me. None of Parise, MarJo, Bjugstad, or Bonino are suited to play next to Fiala, Kaprizov, or Zucc. The Greenway/JEE/Foligno line is working too well to split up. They don't have a center to push Hartman or Sturm to a wing with Fiala. The taxi squad isn't good for more than a 4th line filler. Mayhew is a very good AHL player, but not a NHL player.

This just leaves Boldy as the best untried option MN has to play with the skill wings.


I agree that Boldy would be best suited on Fiala's line someday, maybe not tomorrow. MarJo has been brutal lately.
jnowariak and Lightman13 liked this.
May 19, 2021 at 11:43 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Patient gm
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 992
Quoting: jnowariak
I don’t think Parise has a contract with the Wild next year. Whether he comes in during this series or not, I think we are looking at mutual contract termination.


When it’s mutual contract termination there’s no cap hit correct? No cap hit, no dollars moving or anything?
May 19, 2021 at 11:48 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Morzski
I could see him basically saying, "trade me, buy me out, I don't care I just want to play" We'll see which way it goes this summer. I hope he's able to work hard in the off season and can be a producing 4th liner next year.


I’ve heard his agent met with team management. I’d guess that the team wants a mutual termination since it saves them the most cap and dollars but Parise has the 6 mil payday this year he probably wants. I just don’t see a trade in the books, it’s not worth the assets for the cap you’d save. If worse comes to worse it’ll be a buyout and we’ll eat a mil in cap after the contract ends.
May 19, 2021 at 11:50 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: Lightman13
When it’s mutual contract termination there’s no cap hit correct? No cap hit, no dollars moving or anything?


Pretty sure it would function the same as retiring for cap purposes, so we’d be on the hook for 5 mil for 4 years. Parise would lose out on any salary he was owed though, he’s owed 6 mil next year so that is probably the hold up with the termination.
May 19, 2021 at 11:55 a.m.
#9
Cameron2304
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 20
Likes: 6
I'd say they take out rask over mojo
May 19, 2021 at 11:58 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 8,212
Likes: 3,641
Quoting: Lightman13
When it’s mutual contract termination there’s no cap hit correct? No cap hit, no dollars moving or anything?


MN should still get hit with a recapture on Parise.

Quoting: jnowariak
I’ve heard his agent met with team management. I’d guess that the team wants a mutual termination since it saves them the most cap and dollars but Parise has the 6 mil payday this year he probably wants. I just don’t see a trade in the books, it’s not worth the assets for the cap you’d save. If worse comes to worse it’ll be a buyout and we’ll eat a mil in cap after the contract ends.


I see no reason for Parise to take a mutual termination. He loses $10m from his last 4 years and he won't come close to recouping that. GMBG can talk big but he only really has 2 cards to play: an ugly buyout or pressbox in the NHL.
May 19, 2021 at 12:01 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 8,212
Likes: 3,641
Quoting: Cameron2304
I'd say they take out rask over mojo


Rask is a center (which they have none) and not a blackhole on the ice. MarJo is a wing (which they plenty) and a blackhole on the ice.
May 19, 2021 at 12:01 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 220
Likes: 140
Quoting: jnowariak
I’ve heard his agent met with team management. I’d guess that the team wants a mutual termination since it saves them the most cap and dollars but Parise has the 6 mil payday this year he probably wants. I just don’t see a trade in the books, it’s not worth the assets for the cap you’d save. If worse comes to worse it’ll be a buyout and we’ll eat a mil in cap after the contract ends.


Well yeah trading wouldn't be worth it for the Wild, but Parise wouldn't care. I see him wanting to play somewhere else if it's not in MN.
jnowariak liked this.
May 19, 2021 at 12:07 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: wabit
MN should still get hit with a recapture on Parise.



I see no reason for Parise to take a mutual termination. He loses $10m from his last 4 years and he won't come close to recouping that. GMBG can talk big but he only really has 2 cards to play: an ugly buyout or pressbox in the NHL.


Hence why I said if worse comes to worse it’ll be a buyout?

But they also have the card of sitting him until his buyout is better. The team still has leverage if he wants to play.
May 19, 2021 at 12:24 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 8,212
Likes: 3,641
Quoting: jnowariak
Hence why I said if worse comes to worse it’ll be a buyout?

But they also have the card of sitting him until his buyout is better. The team still has leverage if he wants to play.


That's just it, where does he play? There are better options than Parise even at league min heading into the UFA market. He's not a great locker room guy and doesn't bring much to the ice anymore. If he limits himself to Playoff teams that limits his opportunities even more. The buyout really doesn't get much better because his contract was so frontloaded.

Also you take the chance of losing the team if you're benching him out of spite and playing a Mayhew or Hunt as a FWD instead of him.
May 19, 2021 at 12:36 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: wabit
That's just it, where does he play? There are better options than Parise even at league min heading into the UFA market. He's not a great locker room guy and doesn't bring much to the ice anymore. If he limits himself to Playoff teams that limits his opportunities even more. The buyout really doesn't get much better because his contract was so frontloaded.

Also you take the chance of losing the team if you're benching him out of spite and playing a Mayhew or Hunt as a FWD instead of him.


Short answer, he goes and plays for Lou and the Isles at league min. Honest answer, IDK. All your points are valid but it all comes down to whether he wants to play in the NHL again. The Wild have made a pretty strong statement that he will not hit the ice for them next year. That means if he wants a shot, he has to go elsewhere.

If the team decides to say we will hold off on the buyout for a year for whatever reason, and are committed to it, that alone could force Parise’s hand. I also realize money talks but I’m not sold on how this plays out other than Parise won’t hit the ice next year for the Wild.
May 19, 2021 at 12:53 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 8,212
Likes: 3,641
Quoting: jnowariak
Short answer, he goes and plays for Lou and the Isles at league min. Honest answer, IDK. All your points are valid but it all comes down to whether he wants to play in the NHL again. The Wild have made a pretty strong statement that he will not hit the ice for them next year. That means if he wants a shot, he has to go elsewhere.

If the team decides to say we will hold off on the buyout for a year for whatever reason, and are committed to it, that alone could force Parise’s hand. I also realize money talks but I’m not sold on how this plays out other than Parise won’t hit the ice next year for the Wild.


Lou wanted Parise as the 25g 50-60p winger he was last year and the year before. The 10g, 20p winger he was this year isn't really much of an incentive Lou to take him even at league min now.

I just don't see this working out well for GMBG, and by extension the Wild.
Lightman13 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll