SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Canes 21-22 Forsberg

Created by: vikhodush
Team: 2021-22 Carolina Hurricanes
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 14, 2021
Published: Jun. 14, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Likely not realistic because I’m assuming forsberg wants to re-sign with Preds and they want to re-sign him as well. But this would be a great addition to Carolina and I think it would be the perfect fit. Not sure about the value in the trade but willing to tweak it.

If they did trade for him, assuming he’d get something like a 6x8M extension - going to do a part two for the 22-23 season to see how that plays out with rest of team.

Barrie would be a good replacement to play with Slavin, not sure if that deal is realistic so feel free to weigh in.

Oleksiak brings some size and stability to third pair. Could try Keane out there as Hjalmerson is coming back (honestly not sure about that one). Detroit gas cap space for Gardiner and he’d be serviceable over there if we send a pick with him.

Think Armia would be a great scoop and fit for this team - how’s the contract?
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$900,000
2$6,000,000
2$3,500,000
2$800,000
2$750,000
2$750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$750,000
2$2,300,000
2$3,500,000
2$3,500,000
2$5,500,000
1$1,000,000
2$3,500,000
1$2,500,000
Trades
1.
CAR
  1. Forsberg, Filip
NSH
  1. Fast, Jesper
  2. Foegele, Warren [RFA Rights]
  3. Geekie, Morgan [RFA Rights]
  4. Suzuki, Ryan
  5. 2021 1st round pick (CAR)
  6. 2022 2nd round pick (CAR)
2.
CAR
  1. 2022 6th round pick (DET)
DET
  1. Gardiner, Jake
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (CAR)
3.
CAR
SEA
  1. Skjei, Brady
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the STL
2022
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the DET
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CBJ
2023
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$81,282,749$0$620,000$217,251

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
Svechnikov, Andrei
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
Aho, Sebastian
$8,460,250$8,460,250
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
Teräväinen, Teuvo
$5,400,000$5,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Nashville Predators
Forsberg, Filip
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
Trocheck, Vincent
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
Necas, Martin
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$537,500$538K)
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
Niederreiter, Nino
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
Staal, Jordan
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 2
Armia, Joel
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
Martinook, Jordan
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
Lorentz, Steven
$725,000$725,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
McGinn, Brock
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
McCormick, Max
$750,000$750,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
Waivers ExemptKorshkov, Yegor
$750,000$750,000
RW
RFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
Slavin, Jaccob
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Barrie, Tyson
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
Nedeljkovic, Alex
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
Bean, Jake
$900,000$900,000
LD/RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
Pesce, Brett
$4,025,000$4,025,000
RD
UFA - 3
Oleksiak, Jamie
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 5
Hjalmarsson, Niklas
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
Mrázek, Petr
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
Keane, Joey
$809,166$809,166 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RD
RFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
Waivers ExemptHelvig, Jeremy
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
Lajoie, Maxime
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 14, 2021 at 1:23 p.m.
#1
Caniac2000
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,522
Likes: 5,170
That's WAY too much to give up for someone who's a rental, and he is a rental because Carolina won't have the space to re-sign him with both Trocheck and Nino needing new deals.
Jun. 14, 2021 at 1:24 p.m.
#2
OnlyBadDeals
Your deal is bad
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 873
Likes: 533
If we are giving up that much, an extension has to already be in place
Jun. 14, 2021 at 1:25 p.m.
#3
Shnooks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 404
Likes: 103
I'm not a fan of either team, but that is way too much for Filip Forsberg.
Jun. 14, 2021 at 1:39 p.m.
#4
Zinger
Canes fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 4,475
Likes: 4,578
We're not giving that much for Forsberg. Don't get me wrong here, he'd be a nice add for sure. But since Forsberg will probably want more on his next contract and we are in a bit of a cap crunch here, he would likely end up being just a rental, and I am NOT taking a rental for that price.
Jun. 14, 2021 at 1:41 p.m.
#5
vikhodush
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,927
Likes: 3,450
Quoting: Caniac2000
That's WAY too much to give up for someone who's a rental, and he is a rental because Carolina won't have the space to re-sign him with both Trocheck and Nino needing new deals.


I’m not seeing it as a rental. Posted a part 2 where I played the extension out following season. Let troch and Nino go essentially.
Jun. 14, 2021 at 1:41 p.m.
#6
vikhodush
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,927
Likes: 3,450
Quoting: OnlyBadDeals
If we are giving up that much, an extension has to already be in place


Yep it is - I should’ve made that clearer in description. Check out part 2 where I played out extension in following season.
Jun. 14, 2021 at 1:42 p.m.
#7
vikhodush
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,927
Likes: 3,450
Quoting: Dzinger18
We're not giving that much for Forsberg. Don't get me wrong here, he'd be a nice add for sure. But since Forsberg will probably want more on his next contract and we are in a bit of a cap crunch here, he would likely end up being just a rental, and I am NOT taking a rental for that price.


Definitely should’ve been more clear in description - this is an extension play. Check out my part 2.
Zinger liked this.
Jun. 14, 2021 at 2:48 p.m.
#8
Caniac2000
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,522
Likes: 5,170
Quoting: vikhodush
I’m not seeing it as a rental. Posted a part 2 where I played the extension out following season. Let troch and Nino go essentially.


Letting Trocheck go is comical. He's been the 2nd best player on the roster during his short stint here. Any recommendation that they let him go is straight-up laughable.
Jun. 14, 2021 at 2:52 p.m.
#9
vikhodush
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,927
Likes: 3,450
Quoting: Caniac2000
Letting Trocheck go is comical. He's been the 2nd best player on the roster during his short stint here. Any recommendation that they let him go is straight-up laughable.


He’s been great but I’d assume he wants a big pay day. Would rather not overpay when Necas can and will develop into the 2C of the future. Can improve at another area and still be solid up the middle.
Jun. 14, 2021 at 2:54 p.m.
#10
Caniac2000
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,522
Likes: 5,170
Quoting: vikhodush
Assuming he wants one more big deal as he comes out of his prime I’d rather not overpay. Necas can develop into a 2C or you can find a short term replacement while he does at a reasonable cap hit. That being said if he’s willing to stay on a more team friendly deal then sure go ahead and give him a new deal. Overpaying players on new deals for prior performance is how teams get in trouble.


Necas won't move over, his dominance on the wing has become more too valuable. He's better suited to being the right-shot winger of the top 6. Paying for Trocheck is the priority, moving for a rental like Forsberg right makes no sense.
Jun. 14, 2021 at 2:55 p.m.
#11
vikhodush
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,927
Likes: 3,450
Quoting: Caniac2000
Necas won't move over, his dominance on the wing has become more too valuable. He's better suited to being the right-shot winger of the top 6. Paying for Trocheck is the priority, moving for a rental like Forsberg right makes no sense.


Like I put in the description and in multiple responses. It’s not a rental.
Jun. 14, 2021 at 2:57 p.m.
#12
Caniac2000
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,522
Likes: 5,170
Quoting: vikhodush
Like I put in the description and in multiple responses. It’s not a rental.


It's a rental, because you do not prioritise signing a winger over a center. Trocheck would be re-signed before Forsberg. If you can only pick 1, you take Trocheck over Forsberg which makes him... A RENTAL!
Jun. 14, 2021 at 2:59 p.m.
#13
vikhodush
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,927
Likes: 3,450
Quoting: Caniac2000
It's a rental, because you do not prioritise signing a winger over a center. Trocheck would be re-signed before Forsberg. If you can only pick 1, you take Trocheck over Forsberg which makes him... A RENTAL!


It’s not a rental if it’s a sign and trade, chief. Which as I stated, it is. Have your opinion over who is more valuable or should be prioritized but twisting things around doesn’t change facts.
Jun. 14, 2021 at 4:30 p.m.
#14
Caniac2000
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,522
Likes: 5,170
Quoting: vikhodush
It’s not a rental if it’s a sign and trade, chief. Which as I stated, it is. Have your opinion over who is more valuable or should be prioritized but twisting things around doesn’t change facts.


Simply do a better job of setting up your team! Perhaps don't let the teams 2nd highest scorer walk away!
Jun. 14, 2021 at 5:13 p.m.
#15
vikhodush
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,927
Likes: 3,450
Quoting: Caniac2000
Simply do a better job of setting up your team! Perhaps don't let the teams 2nd highest scorer walk away!


Nah I’m good. This is a very good team. Thanks for your input.
Jun. 14, 2021 at 5:20 p.m.
#16
Caniac2000
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,522
Likes: 5,170
Quoting: vikhodush
Nah I’m good. This is a very good team. Thanks for your input.


Yes a team with no 2C is a good team sure!
Jun. 14, 2021 at 5:21 p.m.
#17
vikhodush
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,927
Likes: 3,450
Quoting: Caniac2000
Yes a team with no 2C is a good team sure!


Yep this team is very good thanks for coming over to my side!
Jun. 14, 2021 at 5:39 p.m.
#18
F50marco
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,649
Likes: 6,777
Quoting: Caniac2000
Simply do a better job of setting up your team! Perhaps don't let the teams 2nd highest scorer walk away!


Yo this is his version of the team. Not yours. Lol
vikhodush liked this.
Jun. 14, 2021 at 5:41 p.m.
#19
vikhodush
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,927
Likes: 3,450
Quoting: F50marco
Yo this is his version of the team. Not yours. Lol


Haha thx bro - it’s all good he’s entitled to his opinion. Just don’t get why he’s so obsessed about a hypothetical in a forum like this where ppl just get creative. I’ve seen a lot of the same old versions and figured this one would be a fun different option
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll