SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs 2122

Created by: jross13
Team: 2021-22 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 23, 2021
Published: Jun. 23, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$800,000
1$775,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$4,000,000
3$4,000,000
1$1,050,000
4$5,000,000
3$1,250,000
2$800,000
2$750,000
3$2,700,000
1$750,000
1$850,000
1$750,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Jenner, Boone ($1,875,000 retained)
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (CBJ)
  3. 2021 5th round pick (NJD)
Additional Details:
Jenner traded to (NJD): 50% of salary retained.
CBJ
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
  2. Rielly, Morgan
Additional Details:
Leafs trade 2021 5th round pick (NJD) to (NJD)
2.
TOR
  1. Watson, Austin ($750,000 retained)
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$81,399,783$0$0$100,217

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 3
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,875,000$1,875,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$750,000$750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 1
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 3
$2,700,000$2,700,000
G
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$725,000$725,000
C
UFA - 1
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 23, 2021 at 4:08 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,749
Likes: 7,382
top pair defender + for a 3C and a 3rd line winger for a terrible 4th liner?
yeah, i think the leafs pass
Jun. 23, 2021 at 4:16 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,749
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: Icekat20
You got it backwards. CBJ would not say yes to an expiring D man, a cap dump and picks. LOLOLOLOLOL, that Canadian education system is grand.


yeah, good one, a full season of Rielly is significantly more valuable than a forward who has had one season in his entire career above 38 points, but nice try! Weird random insult for no reason too. Wild how fragile some people are about their bottom 6 players
Jun. 23, 2021 at 4:23 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
jross13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 44
Likes: 2
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
yeah, good one, a full season of Rielly is significantly more valuable than a forward who has had one season in his entire career above 38 points, but nice try! Weird random insult for no reason too. Wild how fragile some people are about their bottom 6 players


It's not always about the points. It's about the intrinsic value players bring to teams that make a team complete. The leafs have talent but are a far cry away from being a complete team. This team was designed in a way that adds a third line of veteran NHL players that work their ass off, are difficult to play against and bring a role to the team. The Leafs have never had a third line, that has been trust worthy or effective playing against other teams. Unfortunately in sport you have to give up to get and for anyone to take Kerfoot's contract its going to have to come with an attractive piece and as well going to reduce the value in which you receive.
Jun. 23, 2021 at 4:25 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
jross13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 44
Likes: 2
Quoting: jross13
It's not always about the points. It's about the intrinsic value players bring to teams that make a team complete. The leafs have talent but are a far cry away from being a complete team. This team was designed in a way that adds a third line of veteran NHL players that work their ass off, are difficult to play against and bring a role to the team. The Leafs have never had a third line, that has been trust worthy or effective playing against other teams. Unfortunately in sport you have to give up to get and for anyone to take Kerfoot's contract its going to have to come with an attractive piece and as well going to reduce the value in which you receive.


Unfortunately the NHL is a hard cap league and the Leafs have created their own mess in the way they've constructed their roster. If they are going to keep the big 4 together; like they say they are, they are continuously going to have to take less value in trades as they'll always need to shed different players salaries as time moves on or require a team to retain salary.
Jun. 23, 2021 at 4:31 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,535
Likes: 1,238
OTT declines.
sensibleguy liked this.
Jun. 23, 2021 at 4:32 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,749
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: jross13
It's not always about the points. It's about the intrinsic value players bring to teams that make a team complete. The leafs have talent but are a far cry away from being a complete team. This team was designed in a way that adds a third line of veteran NHL players that work their ass off, are difficult to play against and bring a role to the team. The Leafs have never had a third line, that has been trust worthy or effective playing against other teams. Unfortunately in sport you have to give up to get and for anyone to take Kerfoot's contract its going to have to come with an attractive piece and as well going to reduce the value in which you receive.


Yeah, jenner still isnt remotely worth rielly and the value isnt particularly close no matter how many clichés and media and fan driven falsehoods you spout.
Oh, and the leafs wouldnt need to add squat to move kerfoot of they wanted to because hes actually pretty good
Jun. 23, 2021 at 4:33 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
jross13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 44
Likes: 2
Quoting: PLDGEY
OTT declines.


Your profile is Eugene Melnik. A few more years of him and your team is not playing in Ottawa.
Jun. 23, 2021 at 4:33 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,749
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: PLDGEY
OTT declines.


I mean, Dorian is a pretty bad gm but even he's smart enough to trade a bad player for a significantly better one
Jun. 23, 2021 at 4:33 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
jross13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 44
Likes: 2
Quoting: jross13
Your profile is Eugene Melnik. A few more years of him and your team is not playing in Ottawa.


Sorry Kanata...or whatever farmers field your arena is located in.
Jun. 23, 2021 at 4:34 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,535
Likes: 1,238
Quoting: jross13
Your profile is Eugene Melnik. A few more years of him and your team is not playing in Ottawa.


Its okay, youre new here. You'll get better at this whole 'ACGM' thing
sensibleguy liked this.
Jun. 23, 2021 at 4:36 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
jross13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 44
Likes: 2
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
I mean, Dorian is a pretty bad gm but even he's smart enough to trade a bad player for a significantly better one


Why do you think Mikheyev is good???? Sure, the guy skates 400mph but doesn't accomplish anything. He doesn't score, doesn't create much, doesn't hit, doesn't really get involved. Such a replaceable player. You can find a guy that makes league minimum that does that.
Jun. 23, 2021 at 4:36 p.m.
#12
Hutt
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 3
Likes: 1
Quoting: PLDGEY
OTT declines.

If you don’t think they take that trade go back to the streets and suck di** for Wayfair
jross13 liked this.
Jun. 23, 2021 at 4:38 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
jross13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 44
Likes: 2
Quoting: PLDGEY
Its okay, youre new here. You'll get better at this whole 'ACGM' thing


No one can be be good nor bad lol. No ones 'ACGM' team ever hits the ice to find out.
Jun. 23, 2021 at 4:39 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,749
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: jross13
Why do you think Mikheyev is good???? Sure, the guy skates 400mph but doesn't accomplish anything. He doesn't score, doesn't create much, doesn't hit, doesn't really get involved. Such a replaceable player. You can find a guy that makes league minimum that does that.


Mikheyev is fine. He's decent defensively and he drives play pretty good. He's just not as good a scorer as people thought he was.
And it's not about him being particularly good, it's about watson just being awful. Watson is a below replacement level player who is a bad option for any team that isnt actively tanking
Jun. 23, 2021 at 4:40 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,535
Likes: 1,238
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
I mean, Dorian is a pretty bad gm but even he's smart enough to trade a bad player for a significantly better one


Watson scored at a higher points/60 that Mikheyev this year, on a worse team.

Watson is cost controlled

Ilya Mikheyev doesnt play top 6 on OTT and OTT has a glut of bottom 6 depth

Combine that with the fact that you want OTT to retain 1.5M over the remaining 2 years of his contract

No. This is a bad trade. ****ing leaf fans on this site are delusional.
sensibleguy liked this.
Jun. 23, 2021 at 4:43 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
jross13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 44
Likes: 2
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Yeah, jenner still isnt remotely worth rielly and the value isnt particularly close no matter how many clichés and media and fan driven falsehoods you spout.
Oh, and the leafs wouldnt need to add squat to move kerfoot of they wanted to because hes actually pretty good


See this is the problem. You guys watch 82 games of the Leafs and it stops there. I'm not a Leafs fan, I watch probably 700 games a year and if the Leafs acquired Boone Jenner he would be the best bottom 6 forward they currently have out of that collection of garbage they roll out there in the bottom 6 every night. Also, I don't know where Leaf fans get this idea that Rielly is this elite defenceman. He's a really good defenceman, but he's no where close to a one. Does some good things out there, but also does some bad things.
Jun. 23, 2021 at 4:50 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
jross13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 44
Likes: 2
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Mikheyev is fine. He's decent defensively and he drives play pretty good. He's just not as good a scorer as people thought he was.
And it's not about him being particularly good, it's about watson just being awful. Watson is a below replacement level player who is a bad option for any team that isnt actively tanking


Exactly, you hit the nail on the head. Mikeyhev is a "fine" player. If you're striving for fine you're never going to be successful. Driving play is irrelevant if you're not going to finish the play. 1.6+ million for a "fine" player who drives play but doesn't finish is too much.
Jun. 23, 2021 at 4:52 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
jross13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 44
Likes: 2
Quoting: jross13
Exactly, you hit the nail on the head. Mikeyhev is a "fine" player. If you're striving for fine you're never going to be successful. Driving play is irrelevant if you're not going to finish the play. 1.6+ million for a "fine" player who drives play but doesn't finish is too much.


And if you're going to trade him you need a cheaper player, asking a team to retain salary isn't going to give you a ton. However, the cap space has to be quantified as part of the return.
Jun. 23, 2021 at 4:56 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
jross13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 44
Likes: 2
Quoting: PLDGEY
Watson scored at a higher points/60 that Mikheyev this year, on a worse team.

Watson is cost controlled

Ilya Mikheyev doesnt play top 6 on OTT and OTT has a glut of bottom 6 depth

Ottawa has some nice pieces but a "glut" of depth is a bit of a stretch lol. If you think they have any chance of being better than Tampa, Boston, Florida, Montreal, Toronto your'e delusional. You'll finish ahead of Buffalo and Detroit this year which is great I guess, but it's going to be a long season for the Sens again. Their far from competitive. On some nights it will look good, on others disastrous. It's what they are.

Combine that with the fact that you want OTT to retain 1.5M over the remaining 2 years of his contract

No. This is a bad trade. ****ing leaf fans on this site are delusional.
Jun. 23, 2021 at 5:07 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,535
Likes: 1,238
Quoting: jross13


Buddy youve gotta figure out how to quote-reply
sensibleguy liked this.
Jun. 23, 2021 at 5:29 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,749
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: jross13
Exactly, you hit the nail on the head. Mikeyhev is a "fine" player. If you're striving for fine you're never going to be successful. Driving play is irrelevant if you're not going to finish the play. 1.6+ million for a "fine" player who drives play but doesn't finish is too much.


And you're even further if you trade him for a significantly worse guy
Jun. 23, 2021 at 5:29 p.m.
#22
Thread Starter
jross13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 44
Likes: 2
Quoting: PLDGEY
Buddy youve gotta figure out how to quote-reply


As soon as the “buddy” response comes out I know I’ve out smarted you. Enjoy your mediocre franchise.
Jun. 23, 2021 at 5:30 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,749
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: PLDGEY
Watson scored at a higher points/60 that Mikheyev this year, on a worse team.

Watson is cost controlled

Ilya Mikheyev doesnt play top 6 on OTT and OTT has a glut of bottom 6 depth

Combine that with the fact that you want OTT to retain 1.5M over the remaining 2 years of his contract

No. This is a bad trade. ****ing leaf fans on this site are delusional.


Yep, terrible trade for Toronto, ottawa can keep their abuser
Jun. 23, 2021 at 5:31 p.m.
#24
Thread Starter
jross13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 44
Likes: 2
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
And you're even further if you trade him for a significantly worse guy


Quoting: JaredOfLondon
And you're even further if you trade him for a significantly worse guy


How is having a higher points per game than Mikheyev last season deemed as significantly worse? Explain…

Quoting: JaredOfLondon
And you're even further if you trade him for a significantly worse guy


Quoting: JaredOfLondon
And you're even further if you trade him for a significantly worse guy


Quoting: JaredOfLondon
And you're even further if you trade him for a significantly worse guy


Quoting: JaredOfLondon
And you're even further if you trade him for a significantly worse guy
Jun. 23, 2021 at 5:31 p.m.
#25
Serf
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 3,417
Likes: 1,461
Is it safe to say Mikheyev goes from borderline healthy scratch to playoff stud? Welcome to ignore
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll