SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Which one is most fair - take cap

Created by: MaltePalte
Team: 2021-22 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 28, 2021
Published: Jun. 28, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Heineman, Emil [Reserve List]
  2. Lucic, Milan
  3. 2021 1st round pick (CGY)
CGY
  1. 2021 4th round pick (CHI)
2.
CHI
  1. Jones, Caleb
  2. Neal, James
  3. 2022 2nd round pick (EDM)
EDM
  1. 2021 4th round pick (VAN)
3.
CHI
  1. Ladd, Andrew
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (NYI)
  3. 2022 1st round pick (NYI)
NYI
  1. 2021 6th round pick (CHI)
4.
CHI
  1. Eriksson, Loui
  2. Lind, Kole [RFA Rights]
  3. 2021 2nd round pick (VAN)
VAN
  1. 2023 5th round pick (CHI)
5.
CHI
  1. Foote, Cal [RFA Rights]
  2. Johnson, Tyler
  3. 2022 1st round pick (TBL)
TBL
  1. 2022 6th round pick (CHI)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the FLA
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
27$81,500,000$91,226,843$452,439$5,115,000-$9,726,843
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$912,500$912,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$811,667$811,667 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$750,000$750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 28, 2021 at 2:27 p.m.
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,309
Likes: 10,647
Flames won't be using there 1st to dump Lucic IMO
TheLamb9 and MaltePalte liked this.
Jun. 28, 2021 at 2:31 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 108
Likes: 16
Quoting: Gmonwy
Flames won't be using there 1st to dump Lucic IMO


What do you want to give up to dump Lucic? Heineman and 1st (2022) and hope it's not a top 15 pick, or a 2nd?
Jun. 28, 2021 at 2:37 p.m.
#3
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,309
Likes: 10,647
Quoting: MaltePalte
What do you want to give up to dump Lucic? Heineman and 1st (2022) and hope it's not a top 15 pick, or a 2nd?


I think I will keep Lucic. Yes he is overpaid but if Flames lose Gio and trade Looch that will be 2 of the best leaders on the team. And if Tkachuk does really want out and GMBT is saying he doesn't has a negotiation technique that would be our 3 best leaders gone.
MaltePalte liked this.
Jun. 28, 2021 at 2:37 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,240
Likes: 18,368
Johnson and Lucic are still useful players.
Neal maybe some nights.
Ladd isn't playing. And Eriksson might as well not be playing.

And all of those teams will say, "we are not paying to move that salary"
MaltePalte liked this.
Jun. 28, 2021 at 2:41 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 175
Likes: 72
Quoting: MaltePalte
What do you want to give up to dump Lucic? Heineman and 1st (2022) and hope it's not a top 15 pick, or a 2nd?


We would probably try to not give up a 1st cuz our prospect pool isnt in the best shape and Lucic hasnt been that terrible for us. Maybe we would retain a couple mil so we can keep our 1st.
MaltePalte liked this.
Jun. 28, 2021 at 3:29 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 108
Likes: 16
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Johnson and Lucic are still useful players.
Neal maybe some nights.
Ladd isn't playing. And Eriksson might as well not be playing.

And all of those teams will say, "we are not paying to move that salary"


Tampa really wants to get rid of Johnson this summer and they know they need to pay BIG to the team who takes him. I mean there is a reason no one picked him up from waivers.
Jun. 28, 2021 at 3:34 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,240
Likes: 18,368
Quoting: MaltePalte
Tampa really wants to get rid of Johnson this summer and they know they need to pay BIG to the team who takes him. I mean there is a reason no one picked him up from waivers.


I don’t disagree that Lightning will pay to move him.
I just think he would be more attractive for rebuilding club, than Ladd or Neal.

Also, it’s a lot harder to add cap mid-season. So don’t assume all those that pass waivers have negative value.
MaltePalte liked this.
Jun. 28, 2021 at 3:35 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 1,549
Likes: 838
Quoting: MaltePalte
Tampa really wants to get rid of Johnson this summer and they know they need to pay BIG to the team who takes him. I mean there is a reason no one picked him up from waivers.


Biggest reason nobody has taken him is they know Tampa will have to either pay to offload him or if they can't find a taker for him, better players will become available.

For the Oilers one, I'd be hesitant to use a 1st to dump salary but something like this I would do.
MaltePalte liked this.
Jun. 28, 2021 at 3:38 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 108
Likes: 16
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I don’t disagree that Lightning will pay to move him.
I just think he would be more attractive for rebuilding club, than Ladd or Neal.

Also, it’s a lot harder to add cap mid-season. So don’t assume all those that pass waivers have negative value.


Oh, okey. My mistake.

No ofc everyone don't have negative value, but in this case, haha.
Jun. 28, 2021 at 5:53 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,402
Likes: 19,600
Quoting: MaltePalte
What do you want to give up to dump Lucic? Heineman and 1st (2022) and hope it's not a top 15 pick, or a 2nd?


Maybe a 3rd? Absolute max Calgary would pay is a 2nd. Lucic despite being overpaid has been an excellent team leader and positive impact player for the Flames. Not really interested in moving him considering the price it would cost
MaltePalte liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll