Quoting: Islesforthecup
1. Idk maybe im crazy but i see 45% at ev offence.
2. Who said anything about leddy. Youre the only one that was talking about leddy.
3. I read and reread his tweet and not one time did i see him say the regression was limited to offence.
4. In terms of bad quality of teammates hes also had bad quality of competition so i dont really see your point, in fact that suits me better (as qot more directly affects offence and qoc more directly affects defence).
5. If hes gonna be " great defensively and average offensively " dont you think he'll get more than 1.25x2??? Now i do believe his next contract will be around 1x1.3 but thats bc hes not this great 2nd pairing dman. Hes a solid 3rd pairing guy and thats how hes getting paid. Interesting isnt it that a guy will get paid according to the value that he brings to the team?
1.You do realize it's a 3 year weighted sample. If you look at his 20-21 EV offense, it is around the 80th percentile.
2. Well the team made it to the ECF with Leddy playing at a below replacement level at even strength. Kulikov would be an upgrade which is the point im making
3. Read between the lines. If Kulikov has had a borderline elite defensive impact for the last two seasons, he's clearly talking about his offense being the outlier.
4. QOT affects defenseman a lot more than QOC - and his QOC isn't that low. For example, Noah Dobson would have better underlying numbers playing with Adam Pelech against elite competition than with Brayden Coburn against replacement level 4th liners.
5. No because he doesn't put up points or play on the PP. The contract projections are based on what GMs have paid players in the past, "how much someone is worth" is a different thing, which is why It would be smart for a team to sign Kulikov, he will provide excess value on his contract. A lot of GM's would pay Casey Cizikas twice as much as Derek Ryan, but Derek Ryan was the better player this season. This is why analytics are important so it removes bias.