Oh so you're doubling down on your terrible take and proving you actually don't watch hockey. I'd love for you to name these 8 Cs who are apparently better than jack hughes?
Obvious ones out of the way: Matthews, McDavid, McKinnon, Draisaitl... duh
Ones that I give the slight edge to: Pettersson, Thompson
Ones that he's in the mix with: Crosby, Barkov, Point, Aho, Barzal, Zibby
Obvious ones out of the way: Matthews, McDavid, McKinnon, Draisaitl... duh
Ones that I give the slight edge to: Pettersson, Thompson
Ones that he's in the mix with: Crosby, Barkov, Point, Aho, Barzal, Zibby
So, it all depends on how you see it
He's better, but in the same tier as Tage Petterson Crosby Barkov and Point
Aho and Zibenejad are in a tier below with the likes of Hischier Eichel Stutzle etc
Barzal is LEVELs below. He hasn't even been close to a ppg in the 5 years since he last did it.
He's better, but in the same tier as Tage Petterson Crosby Barkov and Point
Aho and Zibenejad are in a tier below with the likes of Hischier Eichel Stutzle etc
Barzal is LEVELs below. He hasn't even been close to a ppg in the 5 years since he last did it.
Tage, Pettersson, Barkov and Point + the 4 other guys makes 8... And Aho is very underrated too...
Barzal's also playing on the Islanders... The poster boys for 1-0 or 2-1 wins... How are you supposed to create offence with that team?
And what do you think the foundation of the WAR is?
I'll admit I'm wrong here... But I still don't like xG... I don't mid xGA bc there's no other measurement to determine defence but xG is a very irrelevant stat
Creating offense isn't everything. Aho and Barkov are elite 200ft players who can both win faceoffs, play PK and defend well. All three things Jack cant.
Creating offense isn't everything. Aho and Barkov are elite 200ft players who can both win faceoffs, play PK and defend well. All three things Jack cant.
Is it a coincidence that the devils struggle to find footing without Hughes but when Aho goes down the Hurricanes are perfectly fine?