SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Revamp

Created by: Bias4bruins
Team: 2021-22 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 17, 2022
Published: Feb. 17, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Forbort and Dillon pretty much the same player but at least one will fight. Hopefully zboril is ready for next year cause FA is weak for D we can afford. Not sure if the garland worth is their but urho is a promising prospect which would be hard to part with but we need more scoring and with term.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$750,000
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. 2022 3rd round pick (NYI)
2.
3.
WPG
  1. Lauko, Jakub
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (BOS)
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$81,760,674$1,956,507$125,000-$260,674
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,375,000$2,375,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,225,000$1,225,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,800,000$3,800,000
LW, C, RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,687,500$3,687,500
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$125,000$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$3,900,000$3,900,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 17, 2022 at 8:55 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 607
Likes: 200
Vancouver probably takes that.
Feb. 17, 2022 at 9:02 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 16,259
Likes: 7,222
The Jets need Dillon and have no need for another left shot winger. Winnipeg says no.
Feb. 17, 2022 at 9:19 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 1,626
Likes: 1,228
Canucks decline. Maybe with different players/prospects involved but the only part of this trade that helps Vancouver is the 1st which isn't enough on its own.
Feb. 17, 2022 at 10:01 p.m.
#4
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Just don’t see the push for garland. Bruins don’t need wingers. 2C, and a top four LD. Those are the needs.
Bias4bruins liked this.
Feb. 18, 2022 at 8:16 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
In Don we trust
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 200
Likes: 40
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Just don’t see the push for garland. Bruins don’t need wingers. 2C, and a top four LD. Those are the needs.


I’m with you on that for sure, just seems the price and availability of those needs is a little out of reach tho. I truthfully think we should stay the course and hopefully make some trades for cap flexibility next year way to many anchor contract on this team.
Feb. 18, 2022 at 8:19 a.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 14,017
Likes: 4,585
Quoting: Bias4bruins
I’m with you on that for sure, just seems the price and availability of those needs is a little out of reach tho. I truthfully think we should stay the course and hopefully make some trades for cap flexibility next year way to many anchor contract on this team.


The thing that’s way worse than just standing pat is spending assets and cap on stuff the team doesn’t need.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll