SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lets Rosterbate

Created by: icehawk2006
Team: 2022-23 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: May 26, 2022
Published: Jun. 16, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
2$2,750,000
2$2,250,000
2$800,000
2$1,100,000
2$1,250,000
1$8,250,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$4,000,000
Offer Sheets
Offer sheet annual average (AAV) is calculated by dividing the contract value by the lower of: 1. The contract length, or 2. Five years
PLAYERAAVCOMPENSATION
Boeser, Brock$8,250,000
2023 1st round pick
2023 2nd round pick
2023 3rd round pick
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. 2023 3rd round pick (CBJ)
2.
SJS
  1. 2022 2nd round pick (SJS)
3.
SJS
  1. 2022 3rd round pick (DAL)
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (DAL)
Additional Details:
Completion of 3 way trade. Instead of a player and a pick. Just provided two picks.
DAL
4.
SJS
ARI
  1. Burns, Brent ($1,000,000 retained)
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (SJS)
Additional Details:
Sent in 3 way trade to Dallas via AZ. AZ will retain an additional $1M.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$71,734,167$0$465,000$10,765,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$894,167$894,167
LW
RFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
$8,250,000$8,250,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$916,667$916,667
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,025,000$1,025,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,833$850,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 16, 2022 at 1:49 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,162
Likes: 3,648
Jesus what a massive overpay to Boeser. Stacked draft and you want to give up all those early picks which are likely lottery picks?
FunMustBeAlways liked this.
Jun. 16, 2022 at 1:59 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 374
Likes: 45
Quoting: glarson17
Jesus what a massive overpay to Boeser. Stacked draft and you want to give up all those early picks which are likely lottery picks?


Not a massive overpay based on what he’s done in his career goal scoring wise. Probably only $1M or so overpay. Counting on last year as an anomaly. That’s the only way to squeeze the Canucks enough for them to possibly not match.

Yes. I’m definitely giving up those picks. Sharks are going to probably be in the creamy middle again (12-15 ish range) and outside of the top 6-7 in the draft, it’s a toss up whether or not the player will turn into a bonafide top 6, that’s if the player turns out at all, which isn’t guaranteed. Would rather give up the picks for a young, proven top 6 goal scorer than for a prospect that may or may not ever turn out.
Jun. 16, 2022 at 5:13 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,227
Likes: 2,874
Trades are decent but that offer sheet is just too much to swallow. I’d much rather go after someone in free agency for that price. If we’re gonna throw around money like that, may as well keep our picks. Sharks have drafted very well with 1st rounders in the last 5-6 years.

And pass on tha Zadorov contract.
glarson17 liked this.
Jun. 16, 2022 at 8:43 p.m.
#4
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,720
Likes: 3,216
The Jackets really don't need more wingers.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 3:49 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 374
Likes: 45
Quoting: FunMustBeAlways
Trades are decent but that offer sheet is just too much to swallow. I’d much rather go after someone in free agency for that price. If we’re gonna throw around money like that, may as well keep our picks. Sharks have drafted very well with 1st rounders in the last 5-6 years.

And pass on tha Zadorov contract.


I appreciate your comment. So let me explain in detail. You won’t get a FA with that 30 goal capability for any less money and really probably for anything less than 7 years. It’s a $500k-$1M overpay per year, sure, but that’s the only way you get him. It’s true, the Sharks have drafted well. However outside of Eklund, none of the Sharks prospects are likely to be top 6 caliber. Even Eklund isn’t guaranteed (mostly because of the development issues for the franchise). The argument could be made for trading a player and a pick for Boeser’s rights, but that’s likely to be 2023 first rounder anyway. With these moves, the Sharks are likely to make the playoff, which means the pick is in the 17-23 range, so the player drafted will likely be an nhl player, but not a top 6 goal scoring threat. The FA forwards on the market, that are likely to actually hit the market are 20-25 goal scorers at best, and older. I’m not counting on Burakovsky and Nichushkin both being available or repeating their career performances from a stacked Colorado team at the age where most pro athletes peak. Also, specifically looking for a RW who shoots right. Laine is a possibility but he’s an RFA and going to get $9M+ and the Sharks don’t need that hit. I would take Boeser and his goal scoring, along with the fact he still hasn’t reached his peak, over any of the aforementioned who are likely going to be paid only $1M or so less.

Zadorov made 3.75 this year. The extra .25 is essentially a CA tax penalty.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll