Apr 23, 2017
San Jose Sharks
Posts per Day
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sebybbq</b></div><div>Since you since to know it all you sure know bob mackenzie, darren dreger, nhl central scouting. They doesn’t all agree, on the rankings you know why? Because the list is made by each individual person they select players they like more. There no official list or more accurate list it all based on opinion. Because everyone know the stats and now with internet you could
Fallow every players from almost every where on earth. But if pronman is higher on a guys then steve or bob mackenzie it doesn’t mean that he know better it just a matter of preference because at this level there little that could translate in nhl players or in professional players elsewhere but this isnt science</div></div>
Wrong. Bob, Darren, Pierre are insiders and know hockey, but they aren't experts in the way that Corey and others are, and almost always defer to them. Bob, Pierre, Darren do not develop the NHL central scouting rankings, and almost always they use them as reference only to build their rankings. There is a reason Sporting News is almost never referenced by the insiders, and a reason why Corey is regularly referenced. There is a reason Corey is writing for the premier hockey publication, and Steve is writing for a throwaway.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>papishark</b></div><div>Ok alot to break down here. You dont know the prospect, you claimed they were worthless and spoke on an article that said they werent. I only tried to correct you when you made a contradictory comment. I also dont have you on twitter and meant no harm in what I said. You obviously dont understand that sometimes people discussing a trade doesnt mean a personal attack on your so beloved maple leafs.</div></div>
A lot to break down here, no, theres not, youre an idiot. I never said any of the things you said in the first place and then again in the second message. I never said they were worthless, I never said cory didnt label them as such, I stated a couple of facts you completely misrepresented and then you went ahead and misrepresented me as a leafs fan. a lot of misrepresentation by a person who I am embarrassed to call a fellow sharks fan. You dont deserve that title. You should go follow Vegas because youre as worthless. I actually know the prospect better than you. I promise. Its a serious hobby of mine to follow prospects very closely and a I do a lot of amateur writing about it. Why? Because I like it, and I used to be in their shoes. So like, I actually have a clue. So maybe instead of throwing sarcastic language trying to insult me (I know you were you jackass, dont be ***** and try and deny it), try and actually learn something before being the typical fan who doesnt have a clue.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>papishark</b></div><div>Uh did you even read it. Blichfield is rated as a LEGIT NHL PROSPECT, and he says only positives about him and his domination of the WHL.</div></div>
Did you even read my post? I NEVER SAID PRONMAN SAID HE WAS BAD DID I. Uh, did you even read his article? He explicitly says LABEL DOESNT GUARANTEE THE ACTUALLY DO ANYTHING!
So, here's an idea, don't be a dick. Honestly, I was making an assessment, with no emotion whatsoever, and you come at me like a jackass. People like you are why I don't usually engage here. Its also why I blocked you on twitter, because your an ass. No I didn't read it, I just said go read it for no ****ing reason. I know he lists it him as a legit NHL prospect. He also lists how he's an overager, but says he still likes him. However, he doesn't go into detail on why he has reservations about an overager. Here is a ****ing clue for you. An overager's possibility of reach the NHL is very very low. They get people excited because they look really good in their overage year, as they should going up against 1st year jr players. That's why I said likely never makes the NHL. I don't agree with Pronman's labeling of Blichfield. I also wanted people to go read his comments and make an assessment themselves. Mine is that he's unlikely to make the NHL. So here is another clue, you dont trade a 70+ point scorer in his prime who you just signed a long term contract with, for a couple of prospects that probably don't pan out (even if Blichfield does, his ceiling is a third liner), a player your going to have to resign for more money than you're willing to pay that you don't need (Dillon), and a couple of low picks. So time to get a few ****ing clues and don't come back until you have them (so I am guessing thats never). And stop being a homer about players. Might as well just jackoff to them instead of come on here and be stupid.