Sorry, that's a 'No' from Edmonton.

It fixes a lot of holes upfront in the short term, but kane for 5 (1 + 4) more years when he's turning 33 in sept is a scary proposition. Not to mention that most likely means we can't afford Toews extension OR to re-up, revamp, reinforce our D and goaltending.

So all that, for a year rental of Toews, and what will be an overpriced Kane and nothing but bottomfeeding D and goalies. Yikes

Still fascinated by the Canes being the default ‘anywhere that wants him’ team. Anaheim is like 3 seconds faster to chose.

I'm a Hawks fan and I can't see Edmonton adding any big-ticket players given that McDavid Draisaitl and Nurse currently account for 37% of Edmonton's cap. Adding a Kane (who will command north of $6MM at least with any extension)) would push them near 50% of the cap for 4 players. That isn't a good way to build your team.

If you're going to pick somewhere to dump a center, shouldn't it be the Rangers? Why is there an obsession to dump a player "anywhere" in Carolina?

Carolina is near the top of the list and they are a contender and they are more probable to trade for him than Anaheim is.

So it’s not anywhere?

It could be Carolina or ANYWHERE else. Don't put too much thought into it.

You skip past Boston to get to Carolina...

It could be Carolina or ANYWHERE else. Don't put too much thought into it.|