SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Keep building

Created by: Jded
Team: 2022-23 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 28, 2022
Published: Jul. 1, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Pipeline is pretty good:
Good at C with Z, McTavish, Lunde
Good at RW with Terry, Pulj, Perreault
Need top line LW to complement Comer, Robertson, Jones. Also have Pastujov, Tracey, and Regenda
Could use a big body top LD to fill in for Fowler down the road & play w JD. Sandin, Zellweger, Lacombe look pretty good for bottom 4
Could use 2nd pair RD behind Drys, Helleson should be bottom 4
Good at G with Stolie, Dostal, Clang

Fowler as C
Manson and Henrique as A
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$4,200,000
3$2,300,000
2$1,000,000
2$1,800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$4,000,000
Offer Sheets
Offer sheet annual average (AAV) is calculated by dividing the contract value by the lower of: 1. The contract length, or 2. Five years
PLAYERAAVCOMPENSATION
Puljujärvi, Jesse$4,200,000
2023 2nd round pick
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. Lucic, Milan
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (CGY)
CGY
2.
ANA
  1. Kassian, Zack
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (EDM)
EDM
  1. 2023 4th round pick (ANA)
Additional Details:
Let’s probably assume this happens before the offer sheet
3.
ANA
  1. Mrázek, Petr
  2. Robertson, Nicholas
  3. Sandin, Rasmus [RFA Rights]
  4. 2022 1st round pick (TOR)
TOR
  1. Gibson, John
  2. Milano, Sonny [RFA Rights]
  3. Steel, Sam [RFA Rights]
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the NSH
2023
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2024
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$58,229,584$0$4,200,000$24,270,416
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,037,500$2,037,500
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,456,250$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, LW
RFA - 3
$4,200,000$4,200,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$796,667$796,667
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,300,000$2,300,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,295,000$1,295,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$425,000$425,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
$1,800,000$1,800,000
LD
UFA - 2
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,800,000$3,800,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 1, 2022 at 11:46 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,400
Likes: 19,597
Manson is probably not going back
Jul. 1, 2022 at 11:51 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,681
Likes: 1,705
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Manson is probably not going back


Based on..? His wife is from here, and he was a favorite among fans, players, and management. Not to mention it’s already been rumored that Verbeek wants to try to bring him back. Honestly if that’s your only criticism I’m pleased
Jul. 1, 2022 at 11:55 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,711
Likes: 7,378
Why are the leafs paying that much for a guy who's posted bad backup numbers for 3 years while making over 6 mill?
Jul. 1, 2022 at 11:56 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 727
I think you need to add 1M to the Manson deal, but with our cap that wouldn't change anything. So whatever on that.

Robertson is so over hyped by Toronto. If he's on our 3rd line I'll be very disappointed. I'd rather find a way to take Robertson and either Steel or Milano out of the trade.

4th line should be Jones - Carrick - Kassian. Waive Grant and send him to San Diego. Honestly I think the Ducks could do a lot better than Carrick too though. Chris Tierney is a UFA I like there.

Otherwise looks good to me.
Jul. 1, 2022 at 12:32 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,400
Likes: 19,597
Quoting: Jded
Based on..? His wife is from here, and he was a favorite among fans, players, and management. Not to mention it’s already been rumored that Verbeek wants to try to bring him back. Honestly if that’s your only criticism I’m pleased


Well I dont have a stake in the Leafs trade so I didn't want to comment on it. And even though I think Lucic may cost a bit less to move due to his actual money owed and the role he plays a 2nd isn't unrealistic by any means.

Personally I think Colorado will try very hard to keep Manson as they probably end up moving Girard, and Josh paired quite well with Byram. When players hit Unrestricted Free Agency for the first time in their prime they tend to try and go somewhere where they think they can win. I don't see Anaheim being a contender for a few years
Jded liked this.
Jul. 1, 2022 at 2:34 p.m.
#6
Matthew Hendrickson
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 43
Likes: 16
I'd probably massage the Maple Leafs trade to not include Milano. Ultimately though I don't think Toronto ends up wanting to trade for Gibson, let alone include Sandin.
Jul. 1, 2022 at 4:36 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,681
Likes: 1,705
Quoting: CHAR
I think you need to add 1M to the Manson deal, but with our cap that wouldn't change anything. So whatever on that.

Robertson is so over hyped by Toronto. If he's on our 3rd line I'll be very disappointed. I'd rather find a way to take Robertson and either Steel or Milano out of the trade.

4th line should be Jones - Carrick - Kassian. Waive Grant and send him to San Diego. Honestly I think the Ducks could do a lot better than Carrick too though. Chris Tierney is a UFA I like there.

Otherwise looks good to me.


I’m kinda not that concerned with the 4th line. Ducks aren’t competing right now, it’s not really a line I’d be tinkering with too much. Definitely wouldn’t waive grant though. He’s a solid bottom 6 guy you could at least trade for a mid-late pick. I don’t love him either, but might as well get value.

Would love to hear why Robertson is overhyped. I haven’t watched him at all but his AHL stats are super promising. I know he’s had some injuries he’s had to overcome and hasn’t clicked at the NHL level yet, but he’s only 20 years old.
Jul. 1, 2022 at 4:39 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,681
Likes: 1,705
Quoting: mhendrickson61
I'd probably massage the Maple Leafs trade to not include Milano. Ultimately though I don't think Toronto ends up wanting to trade for Gibson, let alone include Sandin.


Milano is our overhyped guy imo. He seems to only put up good points with Z, and lacks consistency. I just don’t see him as a long-term piece for ANA. He’s a 3rd liner who needs a 1st line quality center to produce
Jul. 1, 2022 at 4:54 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 727
Quoting: Jded
I’m kinda not that concerned with the 4th line. Ducks aren’t competing right now, it’s not really a line I’d be tinkering with too much.

Would love to hear why Robertson is overhyped. I haven’t watched him at all but his AHL stats are super promising. I know he’s had some injuries he’s had to overcome and hasn’t clicked at the NHL level yet, but he’s only 20 years old.


I just think the 4th line is super easy to improve so why not do it. You already traded for Kassian... might as well play him since he's better than both Grant and Carrick.

Robertson is a 20-year old kid that's never played more than 28 games for any team in any professional league. His career high games played in Junior was 62. I think he's a minimum of a full season in the AHL away from cracking an NHL lineup. Maybe two full seasons. He's also small. Leafs fans act like he's going to step right onto the 2nd line of what ever team they send him to and that he'll put up 50 points. That just isn't going to happen.

If you feel like Robertson has a high ceiling and are willing to play him in the AHL trading for him is fine. I'm not saying he'll never pan out. But thinking he's the answer to an NHL roster spot is wanting too much. Especially a 3rd line spot where it's expected that he'll need to be good defensively. The Ducks aren't deep enough to have 3 scoring lines.
Jul. 1, 2022 at 4:58 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 727
Quoting: Jded
Milano is our overhyped guy imo.


I think a really interesting gamble with Milano is only give him a cheap 1 year contract. He'll be a UFA at the end of it so does he put up a massive season in the most important contract year of his life or does he fizzle under that pressure.

I'd take one great year from Milano and then let the prospects fight over the open spot when he's gone. Maybe you flip him at the TDL or maybe you don't.
Jul. 1, 2022 at 6:15 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,681
Likes: 1,705
Quoting: CHAR
I just think the 4th line is super easy to improve so why not do it. You already traded for Kassian... might as well play him since he's better than both Grant and Carrick.

Robertson is a 20-year old kid that's never played more than 28 games for any team in any professional league. His career high games played in Junior was 62. I think he's a minimum of a full season in the AHL away from cracking an NHL lineup. Maybe two full seasons. He's also small. Leafs fans act like he's going to step right onto the 2nd line of what ever team they send him to and that he'll put up 50 points. That just isn't going to happen.

If you feel like Robertson has a high ceiling and are willing to play him in the AHL trading for him is fine. I'm not saying he'll never pan out. But thinking he's the answer to an NHL roster spot is wanting too much. Especially a 3rd line spot where it's expected that he'll need to be good defensively. The Ducks aren't deep enough to have 3 scoring lines.


I guess what I meant is I didn’t really put a ton of thought to who I put where on the fourth line. I wasn’t tinkering w it.

I’m confused on Robertson. The dude has like 65 career pro games between AHL and NHL under his belt. He’s scoring at a .9p/g pace in AHL, which is pretty solid. And he played 3 seasons in the O in over 160 junior games. Our best wing prospect is 20 year old Perreault with .66p/g in just over 80 AHL games. I don’t think it’s crazy to expect Robertson to make the third line out of camp. Maybe he’ll need another year in the A like Perreault, but he’s farther along stats wise at least. I agree his size isn’t exciting. But he isn’t Yamamoto small or anything
Jul. 1, 2022 at 6:18 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,681
Likes: 1,705
Quoting: CHAR
I think a really interesting gamble with Milano is only give him a cheap 1 year contract. He'll be a UFA at the end of it so does he put up a massive season in the most important contract year of his life or does he fizzle under that pressure.

I'd take one great year from Milano and then let the prospects fight over the open spot when he's gone. Maybe you flip him at the TDL or maybe you don't.


I’ll be honest I don’t see any reason at all to do that. He’s not going to cost much and had decent stats this season. Don’t sign him to a deal where you just lose the asset after the year for nothing or just as a rental. Either trade him now when a team who believes in him can give him a team favorable contract that they can control, or sign him to some term now and trade him in a year if it isn’t working out, but again giving the other team control of him for longer so the return is decent
Jul. 1, 2022 at 8:34 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 727
Quoting: Jded
He’s not going to cost much and had decent stats this season.


Milano is going to get 3M if the term is 3 years. Dickinson got 2.65 last summer and Roslovic 4 this. Sonny easily splits the difference between those two players on a contract that eats two years of his free agency.

That's a number that I'm not very comfortable with given he has a season high of 34 points in his career spanning seven years and lost an entire one of those years to a concussion. Overhyped was your word but one I agree with. I hope Sonny proves me wrong, signs a contract here in Anaheim and gives us 60 points. The Ducks are a better team if that happens.
Jul. 1, 2022 at 10:35 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,681
Likes: 1,705
Quoting: CHAR
Milano is going to get 3M if the term is 3 years. Dickinson got 2.65 last summer and Roslovic 4 this. Sonny easily splits the difference between those two players on a contract that eats two years of his free agency.

That's a number that I'm not very comfortable with given he has a season high of 34 points in his career spanning seven years and lost an entire one of those years to a concussion. Overhyped was your word but one I agree with. I hope Sonny proves me wrong, signs a contract here in Anaheim and gives us 60 points. The Ducks are a better team if that happens.


Agreed but overhyped means there’s some value still. I just don’t see any reason to take an asset that has some value and turn it into nothing in a year
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll