SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Possible trade partner questionmark

Created by: mvp13
Team: 2022-23 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 25, 2022
Published: Jul. 25, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
After acquiring Bjorkstrand and signing Burakovsky, SEA has an absolute influx of wingers. However, they are pretty light on the backend with departures from Giordano, etc. With Weegar, CGY seems to be heavy on the backend. Could a trade work here?

I know SEA just signed McCann, but they probably weren't expecting these wingers to just fall in their lap the way they did. I picked McCann for his ability to also play center (where SEA is now relatively strong at with Beniers, Wright, Wennberg, Gourde, etc), if CGY will need a 2C in Monahan's likely/probable/potential absence. Also, just feeding into the stuff, this trade is an American for a Canadian, so... plus! It's a long term signing for CGY, to give some much needed relief there.

SEA defense pairings will now be Dunn-Larrson, Hanifin-Oleksiak, Soucy-Schultz which is a pretty strong dcorps, I believe. This move also opens up for Tanev to return to the top 9, where he really seemed to thrive in SEA last season, instead of being relegated to the 4th line.

Long term, CGY has 15 contracts signed with 27mil in space, which should be plenty for Huberdeau (9-10mil), Weegar (6mil), the remaining bottom pieces, and figuring out the 2C position (10-11mil for those).
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$5,000,000
2$3,000,000
1$800,000
Trades
SEA
  1. Hanifin, Noah
Additional Details:
I feel like this is fairly even at 1 for 1, but perhaps Calgary adds a pick or prospect.
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$76,455,833$0$232,500$6,044,167
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,900,000$5,900,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,125,000$2,125,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,300,000$1,300,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$800,000$800,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$800,000$800,000 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$855,833$855,833 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
RW, C
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,550,000$1,550,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$912,500$912,500
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 25, 2022 at 1:45 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 27
Likes: 9
That's straight up terrible for Calgary
ecupirate07 liked this.
Jul. 25, 2022 at 1:46 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 728
Quoting: aklavall
That's straight up terrible for Calgary


I know man, it's better to have Backlund as the 2C and be light on wingers, while having 4million dollar defensemen on the bottom pairing
Jul. 25, 2022 at 1:47 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 144
Likes: 11
this is not 1 for 1

Hannifin is a top pairing defenseman on most teams. McCann was left exposed in the expansion draft and was given top line minutes last season.
aklavall liked this.
Jul. 25, 2022 at 1:49 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 27
Likes: 9
Quoting: mvp13
while having 4million dollar defensemen on the bottom pairing


Hanifin is on our top pairing.....
Jul. 25, 2022 at 1:51 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 728
Quoting: aklavall
Hanifin is on our top pairing.....


Obviously, but if he's there it pushes the others down. Weegar is a long term replacement in this scenario
Jul. 25, 2022 at 1:52 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 728
Quoting: dougbailey
this is not 1 for 1

Hannifin is a top pairing defenseman on most teams. McCann was left exposed in the expansion draft and was given top line minutes last season.


McCann wasn't left exposed because he sucks. You should look back to how that happened...
Jul. 25, 2022 at 1:55 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 27
Likes: 9
Quoting: mvp13
Obviously, but if he's there it pushes the others down.


This is not a reason to get rid of your best players. This is a reason to get rid of people down the depth charts like valimaki. This is like saying trade Lindholm because zary doesn't get to play.
Jul. 25, 2022 at 2:01 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 728
Quoting: aklavall
This is not a reason to get rid of your best players. This is a reason to get rid of people down the depth charts like valimaki. This is like saying trade Lindholm because zary doesn't get to play.


Lmao, it's really funny how you continually cherry pick one line to criticize, instead of looking at the whole picture. Oh well
Jul. 25, 2022 at 2:01 p.m.
#9
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: mvp13
Obviously, but if he's there it pushes the others down. Weegar is a long term replacement in this scenario


Not even close to fair. Hanifin is better than Weager and will stay with the flames. Hanifin gets zero respect in this site.
Ledge_And_Dairy liked this.
Jul. 25, 2022 at 2:02 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,636
Likes: 19,745
Quoting: mvp13
I know man, it's better to have Backlund as the 2C and be light on wingers, while having 4million dollar defensemen on the bottom pairing


What are you talking about? Light on wingers? 4M dman on the 3rd pair?
aklavall liked this.
Jul. 25, 2022 at 2:35 p.m.
#11
Wolf.for.Vezina
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 978
Likes: 253
that trade isnt good at all for flames
Jul. 25, 2022 at 2:41 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,694
Likes: 3,362
Have to add at least one good piece going to flames, probably more.
Jul. 25, 2022 at 6:09 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 728
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
What are you talking about? Light on wingers? 4M dman on the 3rd pair?


Two of Shillington (contract pending, I'm assuming between 3-4mil), Zadorov, or Tanev will be on the 3rd pairing. Regarding the offense, I don't know what is confusing. There is no replacement for Gaudreau and no relevant 2C (pending Monahan)

I also say this assuming Dube will be moved back to a forced, uncomfortable center position given the current roster
Jul. 25, 2022 at 6:09 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 728
Quoting: GenXHockey
Not even close to fair. Hanifin is better than Weager and will stay with the flames. Hanifin gets zero respect in this site.


Hanifin is definitely good, but I think you are crazy to say Hanifin is better long term, from today forward
Jul. 25, 2022 at 8:34 p.m.
#15
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: mvp13
Hanifin is definitely good, but I think you are crazy to say Hanifin is better long term, from today forward


Yes from today forward. Provided they can sign him long term. Considering Weager is rhd and stronger on that side I would keep Hanafin and move Tanev next off season.
Jul. 25, 2022 at 9:51 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,636
Likes: 19,745
Quoting: mvp13
Two of Shillington (contract pending, I'm assuming between 3-4mil), Zadorov, or Tanev will be on the 3rd pairing. Regarding the offense, I don't know what is confusing. There is no replacement for Gaudreau and no relevant 2C (pending Monahan)

I also say this assuming Dube will be moved back to a forced, uncomfortable center position given the current roster


Kylington certainly hasn't earned anywhere close to 4M, 2.5M max. Also Sutter os notorious for rolling the lines pretty evenly. Last year despite being "3rd pair" Gudbranson averaged over 18 minutes a night. Even if Weegar were to be played at 3RD he would very possibly get time on both special teams and average close to 20 minutes. And none of Z, Kylington, or Weeger make or will make 4M

Huberdeau is clearly the replacement for Gaudreau so you can maybe argue there's no replacement for Tkachuk. McCann however certainly doesnt replace that. Monahan is currently expected to return and Pelletier is expected to make the top 9. Depth is far from an issue. The only worrying thing is the loss of an elite talent
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll