SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

For the love of Gibson get that man some help in the crease

Created by: GiggywithGibby
Team: 2022-23 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 5, 2022
Published: Nov. 5, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
We need someone to clear out the crease for Gibson, the poor man is getting destroyed because the Ducks are 10 ply in front of him. Cannucks fans have been on here looking to dump Myers to get out from under his cap and get a physical player back at league minimum who can play the right side. Myers contract also helps the Ducks next season reach the cap floor and takes one of the openings at RHD.

Myers would play with Fowler to provide some physicality on that line, Klingberg would play with Kulikov for the same reasons. 1st vs 2nd pairing is not in necessarily based on play time, rather focused on defensive partner.
Trades
ANA
  1. Myers, Tyler
Additional Details:
Cannucks get out from under Myers contract and get a league min depth defenseman.
VAN
  1. Beaulieu, Nathan
  2. 2024 7th round pick (ANA)
Additional Details:
Anaheim gets a RHD to take Drysdale's spot for the season
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2024
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2025
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$63,712,917$0$4,282,500$18,787,083

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,456,250$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,650,000$3,650,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,037,500$2,037,500
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,295,000$1,295,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$855,000$855,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$762,500$762,500
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$425,000$425,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,125,000$1,125,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 5, 2022 at 7:53 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,828
Likes: 12,203
I would be opposed — a Myers Beaulieu trade would be fine with me but I’d need some value coming back if we are eating that whole contract, innerdivisional tax I suppose you could say
GMBL liked this.
Nov. 5, 2022 at 7:54 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 10,389
Likes: 4,004
Quoting: GeneralLandro
I would be opposed — a Myers Beaulieu trade would be fine with me but I’d need some value coming back if we are eating that whole contract, innerdivisional tax I suppose you could say


we could retain a bit, but there's no way we will be giving picks here. We already moved a 2nd to dump dickinson and that's a disaster. Myers is not negative value at a more reasonable cap hit.

I would counter with Moore (neg value) and a 4th for Myers at 1.5-2m retained.
Nov. 5, 2022 at 7:55 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 405
Likes: 120
It's an interesting one for the Canucks, Myers w/ salary retained next season becomes a really valuable asset (probably returns a 2nd/3rd), but right now Canucks would likely have to sweeten to move.
WhereArtTLuongo liked this.
Nov. 5, 2022 at 7:57 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 8,840
Likes: 3,417
I think it would be best for ANA to save this trade for next year just in case they decide the rebuild is over, there could be some good options in FA that they would rather be paying. Would also leave the door open for a Klingberg extension/signing.
Nov. 5, 2022 at 8:05 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,828
Likes: 12,203
Quoting: GMBL
I think it would be best for ANA to save this trade for next year just in case they decide the rebuild is over, there could be some good options in FA that they would rather be paying. Would also leave the door open for a Klingberg extension/signing.


I think I agree with this overall

Quoting: Wqrrior
we could retain a bit, but there's no way we will be giving picks here. We already moved a 2nd to dump dickinson and that's a disaster. Myers is not negative value at a more reasonable cap hit.

I would counter with Moore (neg value) and a 4th for Myers at 1.5-2m retained.


We have no reason to move Moore’s contract though so that doesn’t really make much sense for us
GMBL liked this.
Nov. 5, 2022 at 8:08 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 10,197
Likes: 6,981
Edited Nov. 5, 2022 at 8:20 p.m.
Quoting: Wqrrior
we could retain a bit, but there's no way we will be giving picks here. We already moved a 2nd to dump dickinson and that's a disaster. Myers is not negative value at a more reasonable cap hit.

I would counter with Moore (neg value) and a 4th for Myers at 1.5-2m retained.


Anaheim isn't in a position that we need retention, but if you want to take John Moore and retain for a 4th, I'm not going to scoff at it. That leaves us more room for a potential Klingberg deal. Drysdale is going to get a cheap, short term bridge since he got hurt this year, it'll give him another season or two to prove himself for a better deal, so we won't run into any cap issues.

Quoting: GeneralLandro
I would be opposed — a Myers Beaulieu trade would be fine with me but I’d need some value coming back if we are eating that whole contract, innerdivisional tax I suppose you could say


Dude, I just can't see my guy hurt anymore. I knew this season was going to be rough but holy ****, I didn't think we were going to be brutalizing our goalies. I almost want to trade Gibson somehwere competitive just so to end his suffering. If it costs a mid round pick to get Gibson some help, the send the pick. We have a lot of good draft capital, and we still have a well stocked prospect pool, I could give a damn if the 23 4th turns into the next Troy Terry, that'll be 5 years from now, and we would get help for the next two years from Myers, and maybe he sticks around for a bit after his current contract, so long as he bulldozes the crease, I don't care if we loose the trade.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll