SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Get some value at the TDL

Created by: Digitalbooya06
Team: 2022-23 Minnesota Wild
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 8, 2022
Published: Dec. 8, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
Trades
1.
MIN
  1. 2023 1st round pick (TOR)
Additional Details:
Could be any team
TOR
  1. Dumba, Matt ($3,000,000 retained)
2.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2024
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2025
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$75,223,587$0$1,115,000$7,276,413
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,700,000$1,700,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$750,000$750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$350,000$350K)
C, LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$600,000$600K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$800,000$800,000
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$825,000$825,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$750,000$750,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,575,000$7,575,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$795,000$795,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$787,500$787,500
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$828,333$828,333 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$925,000$925,000
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LD
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 8, 2022 at 3:31 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 520
Rasmus hasn't done much in los angeles to be worth Jacob Middleton who just resigned to 3 years extension and big body on d..dumba I agree
Dec. 8, 2022 at 3:37 p.m.
#2
Benny
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2016
Posts: 405
Likes: 162
Haven't seen much of Dumba, but his he worth a 1st rounder? From what I see on Capfriendly, every Min post he is traded. I don't think a contending team bites for Dumba at this cost
Dec. 8, 2022 at 3:39 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Osiecki death stare
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 564
Quoting: Wildnochance
Rasmus hasn't done much in los angeles to be worth Jacob Middleton who just resigned to 3 years extension and big body on d..dumba I agree


Middleton is redundant for the current D. So either he has to go or Merrill has to go. We can’t block Hunt/O’Rourke/Lambos/Peart for forever.
Dec. 8, 2022 at 3:41 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Osiecki death stare
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 564
Quoting: Laquille
Haven't seen much of Dumba, but his he worth a 1st rounder? From what I see on Capfriendly, every Min post he is traded. I don't think a contending team bites for Dumba at this cost

I’d say he is worth a 1st. Minnesota needs to use his cap elsewhere on the roster (Boldy contract) and they might as well get value for him before he’s gone.
Wildnochance liked this.
Dec. 8, 2022 at 3:42 p.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 520
Quoting: Digitalbooya06
Middleton is redundant for the current D. So either he has to go or Merrill has to go. We can’t block Hunt/O’Rourke/Lambos/Peart for forever.


Merrill he sucks. Plus we all know Guerin loves his cheap players and big body players he trades for, and resigns.
Plus dean needs to be fired if we want young players to have a chance before their 2nd or 3 year. Duhaime has only played since rookie year because he can fight. Look at mason shaw: he should have been in NHL since at least last year, also connor dewar.
Dec. 8, 2022 at 3:44 p.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 520
Quoting: Digitalbooya06
I’d say he is worth a 1st. Minnesota needs to use his cap elsewhere on the roster (Boldy contract) and they might as well get value for him before he’s gone.


Kulak whose like a 8th dman got a 2nd and more from Edmonton last year. Ben chariot got a 1st. Desperate contenders will pay especially if Minnesota retains

He will be Edmonton's 2nd or 3rd best dman. Toronto's best dman or up there
Dec. 8, 2022 at 3:44 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1,920
Quoting: Digitalbooya06
Middleton is redundant for the current D. So either he has to go or Merrill has to go. We can’t block Hunt/O’Rourke/Lambos/Peart for forever.


Middleton isn't redundant, he's one of the few big boys we have on the back end. Merrill is much worse and should be gone long before Middleton.

Also - those kids are all at least a full year away. But realistically, it's a couple years.
MNBassman liked this.
Dec. 8, 2022 at 4:09 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Osiecki death stare
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 564
Quoting: Wildnochance
Merrill he sucks. Plus we all know Guerin loves his cheap players and big body players he trades for, and resigns.
Plus dean needs to be fired if we want young players to have a chance before their 2nd or 3 year. Duhaime has only played since rookie year because he can fight. Look at mason shaw: he should have been in NHL since at least last year, also connor dewar.


Quoting: drmantalban
Middleton isn't redundant, he's one of the few big boys we have on the back end. Merrill is much worse and should be gone long before Middleton.

Also - those kids are all at least a full year away. But realistically, it's a couple years.

The difference between Merrill and Middleton isn’t a lot. Middleton has youth on his side and Merrill is in a rough patch currently. Over the course of a season, they are very comparable.

Middleton is redundant with O’Rourke and Merrill IMO. Plus, Middleton would return the most out of that group.
Dec. 8, 2022 at 4:21 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1,920
Quoting: Digitalbooya06
The difference between Merrill and Middleton isn’t a lot. Middleton has youth on his side and Merrill is in a rough patch currently. Over the course of a season, they are very comparable.

Middleton is redundant with O’Rourke and Merrill IMO. Plus, Middleton would return the most out of that group.


Middleton is signed for 3 years at 2.45M and plays top pair with Spurgeon. Merrill is a 7th D and ROR is currently bottom pair in Iowa. These aren't 3 interchangeable pieces just because they're all tall and play a stay-at-home style.

Idk what team you're watching if you think Middleton is the same as those other two and should be moved for an AHL tweener in Kupari.
MNBassman liked this.
Dec. 8, 2022 at 4:23 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Osiecki death stare
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 564
Quoting: drmantalban
Middleton is signed for 3 years at 2.45M and plays top pair with Spurgeon. Merrill is a 7th D and ROR is currently bottom pair in Iowa. These aren't 3 interchangeable pieces just because they're all tall and play a stay-at-home style.

Idk what team you're watching if you think Middleton is the same as those other two and should be moved for an AHL tweener in Kupari.

Do you actually think Middleton is a top pair level defender?
Dec. 8, 2022 at 4:27 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1,920
Quoting: Digitalbooya06
Do you actually think Middleton is a top pair level defender?


No, but he's a heck of a lot closer to one than Merrill and ROR are. The point is that they're not interchangeable - not that Midds is a bona fide top pair player.
MNBassman liked this.
Dec. 8, 2022 at 4:29 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Osiecki death stare
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 564
Quoting: drmantalban
No, but he's a heck of a lot closer to one than Merrill and ROR are. The point is that they're not interchangeable - not that Midds is a bona fide top pair player.

Their play style is the redundant part. I already said that Middleton was the best of the bunch, which means he would also return the most of the bunch.
Dec. 8, 2022 at 4:31 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,352
Likes: 3,387
Quoting: drmantalban
No, but he's a heck of a lot closer to one than Merrill and ROR are. The point is that they're not interchangeable - not that Midds is a bona fide top pair player.


He might be closer, but I don't think it's "a heck of a lot" closer. He's still just a bottom pairing guy. And last I checked, Brodin is the top pairing guy, so Middleton is playing with Spurgeon on the second pair.
Dec. 8, 2022 at 4:35 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1,920
Quoting: Digitalbooya06
Their play style is the redundant part. I already said that Middleton was the best of the bunch, which means he would also return the most of the bunch.


Well if the elevated return is Rasmus Kupari, I'm not sure how that's a meaningful point at all.

At that return, you're basically dumping him for a chip and a chair, which I have no interest in.
Dec. 8, 2022 at 4:39 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1,920
Quoting: Caerii
He might be closer, but I don't think it's "a heck of a lot" closer. He's still just a bottom pairing guy. And last I checked, Brodin is the top pairing guy, so Middleton is playing with Spurgeon on the second pair.


I guess it depends on how you define close. If you go off the analytics, Middleton is outperforming Merrill by a statistically significant margin. I don't put much stock into that, since he's playing with Spurgeon and there's a lot of flaws with the NHL event data, but there are metrics that show them as being quite far apart in performance.

As for top pair...sure I guess. Last I checked, Brodin hasn't been playing, but I get the point. I'm not here to argue Middleton is top pair over Brodin.
Dec. 8, 2022 at 4:50 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,352
Likes: 3,387
Quoting: drmantalban
I guess it depends on how you define close. If you go off the analytics, Middleton is outperforming Merrill by a statistically significant margin. I don't put much stock into that, since he's playing with Spurgeon and there's a lot of flaws with the NHL event data, but there are metrics that show them as being quite far apart in performance.

As for top pair...sure I guess. Last I checked, Brodin hasn't been playing, but I get the point. I'm not here to argue Middleton is top pair over Brodin.


Does it matter how I define close if we're talking about two bottom pair defensemen? They're both third pair guys. If one is better is better than the other, it's going to be a minimal impact on the game as a whole. Honestly I don't really care which one gets traded, except that Middleton earns twice as much money as Merrill. And I'm sure Guerin and Evason both prefer Middleton to Merrill, but in the end, they're both still third pair players, and neither of them have much of a significant impact on the games outcome each night.
Dec. 8, 2022 at 4:53 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 8,221
Likes: 3,642
Quoting: Wildnochance
Merrill he sucks. Plus we all know Guerin loves his cheap players and big body players he trades for, and resigns.
Plus dean needs to be fired if we want young players to have a chance before their 2nd or 3 year. Duhaime has only played since rookie year because he can fight. Look at mason shaw: he should have been in NHL since at least last year, also connor dewar.


TBF, Duhaime only got a chance last year because Boldy got injured during the preseason. The roster decisions are (mostly) on the GM, not the coach.

Dewar and Shaw being in the AHL/NHL isn't a hill I'd be willing to die on. They are just fringe players; the same as Steel, Pitlick, Petan, Rask, Jost, etc. that MN has gone though in the last couple of seasons. They would be afterthoughts if Fiala and Sturm had re-signed and Rossi did good things.
MNBassman liked this.
Dec. 8, 2022 at 5:03 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Osiecki death stare
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 564
Quoting: drmantalban
Well if the elevated return is Rasmus Kupari, I'm not sure how that's a meaningful point at all.

At that return, you're basically dumping him for a chip and a chair, which I have no interest in.

What exactly do you expect for a #4/#5 D?
Dec. 8, 2022 at 5:17 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1,920
Quoting: Caerii
Does it matter how I define close if we're talking about two bottom pair defensemen? They're both third pair guys. If one is better is better than the other, it's going to be a minimal impact on the game as a whole. Honestly I don't really care which one gets traded, except that Middleton earns twice as much money as Merrill. And I'm sure Guerin and Evason both prefer Middleton to Merrill, but in the end, they're both still third pair players, and neither of them have much of a significant impact on the games outcome each night.


They're not both bottom pair, though - one of them has to play in the top 4 with our current roster construction. So the difference gets magnified by way of the minutes and situations that one of them has to be in.

If we had 2 clear LD above them, then no I don't think it would really matter at all. You'd be splitting hairs over which 3rd pair guy is better, so I agree on that.
Dec. 8, 2022 at 5:19 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1,920
Quoting: Digitalbooya06
What exactly do you expect for a #4/#5 D?


It's not about what I expect. You're arguing that Middleton should be the one to go, because he'd return more value. But the "more value" is so low, that it's not an important point. It's a completely insignificant difference in trade value between the two. So I would prefer to keep the better player.
MNBassman liked this.
Dec. 8, 2022 at 5:39 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,352
Likes: 3,387
Quoting: drmantalban
They're not both bottom pair, though - one of them has to play in the top 4 with our current roster construction. So the difference gets magnified by way of the minutes and situations that one of them has to be in.

If we had 2 clear LD above them, then no I don't think it would really matter at all. You'd be splitting hairs over which 3rd pair guy is better, so I agree on that.


Yeah he's "second pair" in the way that Sam Steel, Nic Petan and Freddy Gaudreau are "top six".

It doesn't mean much, other than our roster sucks.
Dec. 8, 2022 at 6:39 p.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Osiecki death stare
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 564
Quoting: drmantalban
It's not about what I expect. You're arguing that Middleton should be the one to go, because he'd return more value. But the "more value" is so low, that it's not an important point. It's a completely insignificant difference in trade value between the two. So I would prefer to keep the better player.


Here’s the way I look at it: I’d rather have Kupari next to Boldy than Middleton next to Spurgeon.
Dec. 8, 2022 at 8:56 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1,920
Quoting: Digitalbooya06
Here’s the way I look at it: I’d rather have Kupari next to Boldy than Middleton next to Spurgeon.


Agree to disagree there I guess. Kupari is just another version of Jost. He’s not even in the NHL right now.
MNBassman liked this.
Dec. 8, 2022 at 9:04 p.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Osiecki death stare
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 564
Quoting: drmantalban
Agree to disagree there I guess. Kupari is just another version of Jost. He’s not even in the NHL right now.


That is a remarkably bad comparison. Well done.
Dec. 8, 2022 at 9:33 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1,920
Quoting: Digitalbooya06
That is a remarkably bad comparison. Well done.


Lol no need to get salty. Kupari is a wannabe top 6 guy who can’t produce, same as Jost. Look at their stats and metrics. Just cuz Kupari is bigger doesn’t mean anything. He doesn’t play particularly hard and is yet another one of many tweeners that every team has.

tbh at this point, I’m starting to think you originally confused Vilardi with Kupari and are too far down to retract it…Kupari is literally playing in the AHL, what on earth makes you think he can step in and be effective with Boldy lol?
MNBassman liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll