SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

A more conservative deadline

Created by: LloydminsterLarry
Team: 2022-23 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 19, 2022
Published: Dec. 19, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. Puljujärvi, Jesse
  2. 2024 4th round pick (EDM)
Additional Details:
Send JP packing.
2.
EDM
  1. 2023 3rd round pick (SEA)
SEA
  1. Yamamoto, Kailer
Additional Details:
Send him back home. He can return on the cheap.
3.
EDM
  1. Bonino, Nick ($1,000,000 retained)
  2. Nieto, Matt
SJS
  1. Lavoie, Raphael
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (EDM)
  3. 2024 5th round pick (EDM)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2024
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2025
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$79,499,000$896,000$1,350,000$3,001,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$25,000$25,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,250,000$1,250,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$798,000$798,000
C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$9,250,000$9,250,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,250,000$3,250,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,125,000$1,125,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,167,000$4,167,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$850,000$850,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,200,000$2,200,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 19, 2022 at 2:02 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 531
would think SJ definitely says yes to that
LloydminsterLarry liked this.
Dec. 19, 2022 at 2:03 p.m.
#2
I make typos
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 5,324
Likes: 4,991
Yamo is worth more then that
Dec. 19, 2022 at 2:06 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
NoMoreJustin
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 287
Likes: 103
Quoting: oilersguy
Yamo is worth more then that


He’s worth a 2nd but teams know we are in a bad spot with the cap.
Dec. 19, 2022 at 2:10 p.m.
#4
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,857
Likes: 6,637
Leason can't be traded without first going back on waivers.
Dec. 19, 2022 at 2:23 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,440
Likes: 6,060
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Leason can't be traded without first going back on waivers.


Why not?
Dec. 19, 2022 at 2:25 p.m.
#6
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 1,976
Likes: 864
Quoting: poeticentropy
would think SJ definitely says yes to that


I would say switch out Lavoie for Kemp. the Barracuda need better defensive depth, especially on that right side.
Dec. 19, 2022 at 3:56 p.m.
#7
BORDEGOD
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 1,310
Likes: 490
Quoting: AStovetop
I would say switch out Lavoie for Kemp. the Barracuda need better defensive depth, especially on that right side.


Not next year with Havelid and Laroque coming up.
Dec. 19, 2022 at 4:02 p.m.
#8
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 1,976
Likes: 864
Quoting: Kjell_Forsman
Not next year with Havelid and Laroque coming up.


True if either of them can stay healthy lol.

The only thing is Merkley will (should) be up with the Sharks as will possibly Cicek, Hatakka, and/or Kniazev. (depending on how many moves we make at the deadline this year and in the offseason). I can't imagine many of Nutivaara, Simek, Megna, and Harrington will be back next year
Dec. 19, 2022 at 4:04 p.m.
#9
BORDEGOD
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 1,310
Likes: 490
Quoting: AStovetop
True if either of them can stay healthy lol.

The only thing is Merkley will (should) be up with the Sharks as will possibly Cicek, Hatakka, and/or Kniazev. (depending on how many moves we make at the deadline this year and in the offseason). I can't imagine many of Nutivaara, Simek, Megna, and Harrington will be back next year


No but Grier isn't one to rush prospects either. Hatakka maybe. Can't see Kniazev making the NHL yet and Merkley simply hasn't dominated in the AHL yet.
Dec. 19, 2022 at 4:12 p.m.
#10
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,857
Likes: 6,637
Quoting: UpsideDownQue
Why not?


Because we claimed him on waivers this season from Washington.

You can't claim someone off waivers and then turn around and trade them in the same season. Rules stipulate they would have to be waived again, and if they clear, then they could be traded.
Dec. 19, 2022 at 6:17 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,440
Likes: 6,060
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Because we claimed him on waivers this season from Washington.

You can't claim someone off waivers and then turn around and trade them in the same season. Rules stipulate they would have to be waived again, and if they clear, then they could be traded.


I'm pretty sure Colorado just did that with Dryden Hunt
Dec. 19, 2022 at 6:50 p.m.
#12
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,857
Likes: 6,637
Quoting: UpsideDownQue
I'm pretty sure Colorado just did that with Dryden Hunt


Looks like I slightly misread the rules on waivers. Below is an excerpt from thehockeywriters.com

"Can You Trade a Player Claimed off Waivers?
Players who are claimed off waivers must be offered to the other teams that placed an original claim before that player can be traded.

For example, if a player is placed on waivers and three teams place a claim on him. The team lowest in the standards gets first dibs. If they then decide to trade the player, he would first have to be passed on by the other two teams. If a team places a claim, he’d be theirs. If not, he can be traded."

So, if we were the only team to have placed a claim on Leason, then yes, we could trade him, if anyone else put in a claim then no. I have no idea if its even possible to see who all placed a claim on a player.
UpsideDownQue liked this.
Dec. 20, 2022 at 11:49 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,440
Likes: 6,060
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Looks like I slightly misread the rules on waivers. Below is an excerpt from thehockeywriters.com

"Can You Trade a Player Claimed off Waivers?
Players who are claimed off waivers must be offered to the other teams that placed an original claim before that player can be traded.

For example, if a player is placed on waivers and three teams place a claim on him. The team lowest in the standards gets first dibs. If they then decide to trade the player, he would first have to be passed on by the other two teams. If a team places a claim, he’d be theirs. If not, he can be traded."

So, if we were the only team to have placed a claim on Leason, then yes, we could trade him, if anyone else put in a claim then no. I have no idea if its even possible to see who all placed a claim on a player.


That makes sense. I don't think they publish which teams make waiver claims but im sure the league keeps track of it internally
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll