SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Mid Season Report Cards 2022-23

Created by: NoVaSpartan
Team: 2022-23 Washington Capitals
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 6, 2023
Published: Jan. 6, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Did it last year and enjoyed doing it, so I'm doing it again!

Here's last years, for reference: https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/3020384

Compared to last year, this team feels like they're playing a lot better. I could go either way with a couple of these different players (Alexeyev and Irwin could be argued up a tier, Protas could be argued down a tier). Overall though, this feels like a different team, in a good way, and not as much shooting themselves in the foot for every toe they have as last year.

Top of the Grade is closest to the next letter grade, and the bottom is almost the next grade down (though this year, a lot of guys are close together so being at the bottom isn't always a way to signify how close they are to the next tier)
Free Agent Signings
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Excelling, Grade A
1$800,000
Good, Grade B
1$800,000
Mediocre, Grade C
1$800,000
Bad, Grade D
1$800,000
Awful, Grade F
1$800,000
Not Enough Games, Not Eligible
1$800,000
Kuemper, Darcy
1$800,000
Lindgren, Charlie
1$800,000
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
2024
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
2025
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the WSH
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
31$82,500,000$62,510,000$100,000$82,500$19,990,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Excelling, Grade A
$800,000$800,000
Good, Grade B
$800,000$800,000
Mediocre, Grade C
$800,000$800,000
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$9,500,000$9,500,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$791,667$791,667
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Lindgren, Charlie
$800,000$800,000
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$800,000$800,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$5,750,000$5,750,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Kuemper, Darcy
$800,000$800,000
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$762,500$762,500
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$1,300,000$1,300,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$1,275,000$1,275,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$789,167$789,167 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
RW, LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$950,000$950,000
RD
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Bad, Grade D
$800,000$800,000
Awful, Grade F
$800,000$800,000
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$2,415,000$2,415,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$863,333$863,333
LW, C
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Not Enough Games, Not Eligible
$800,000$800,000
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$5,166,667$5,166,667
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$9,200,000$9,200,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$3,600,000$3,600,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 6, 2023 at 11:53 a.m.
#1
Icedragon4405
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 453
Aube-Kubel in F tier he has been awful and Snively can’t be ranked cause they have only played him once. It is frustrating as a caps team to see Snively is the kind of player they need in the lineup a skilled, speedy young player and instead they constantly play a guy like Kubel who is slow has barely any skill doesn’t score and takes awful penalties all the time that really hurts the teams chances it drives me insane that they play kubel over Snively it’s stupid
Jan. 6, 2023 at 12:10 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 5,322
Likes: 5,746
Quoting: Icedragon4405
Aube-Kubel in F tier he has been awful and Snively can’t be ranked cause they have only played him once. It is frustrating as a caps team to see Snively is the kind of player they need in the lineup a skilled, speedy young player and instead they constantly play a guy like Kubel who is slow has barely any skill doesn’t score and takes awful penalties all the time that really hurts the teams chances it drives me insane that they play kubel over Snively it’s stupid


I disagree here. Aube Kubel hasn't been stellar, but he's been far from terrible in all facets. Has brought more speed to the lines he's been on and has been defensively competent in games. Only 5 points could be construed as underwhelming but 5 points in 13 games isn't terrible from a bottom 6er. The penalties are a bit rough but rounded out by other facets of his game.

As for Snively, I chose to rank him as he's been on the roster and uninjured the whole year and in his 6 games, has really failed to show too much that makes me think he should be in the lineup ahead of guys like NAK. He has only 1 assist in those 6 games and to me, hasn't shown a lot to prove himself defensively, especially with larger opportunities to perform by getting 4th line time, as opposed to NAK who's had less opportunities on a worse 3rd line.
All_Knowing and capsfan2121 liked this.
Jan. 6, 2023 at 12:29 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,710
Likes: 1,063
Quoting: NoVaSpartan
I disagree here. Aube Kubel hasn't been stellar, but he's been far from terrible in all facets. Has brought more speed to the lines he's been on and has been defensively competent in games. Only 5 points could be construed as underwhelming but 5 points in 13 games isn't terrible from a bottom 6er. The penalties are a bit rough but rounded out by other facets of his game.

As for Snively, I chose to rank him as he's been on the roster and uninjured the whole year and in his 6 games, has really failed to show too much that makes me think he should be in the lineup ahead of guys like NAK. He has only 1 assist in those 6 games and to me, hasn't shown a lot to prove himself defensively, especially with larger opportunities to perform by getting 4th line time, as opposed to NAK who's had less opportunities on a worse 3rd line.


Totally agree with NAK and Snively assessment. I actually think NAK is ranked perfectly - he has come in and done a fine-ish job in his role. Irwin and McM are ranked appropriately as well. I initially thought McM should be in F grade, but not having played consistently and not playing his natural position does not help.

The only thing I would slightly disagree with is Eller being an F. I have probably been one of few Caps fans who is "softer" on Eller (as I am with Carlson as well), but Eller has been the best Cap in the faceoff dot (almost 54%), and has been quite good on PKs. Yes, his penalty numbers are bad and only 15 points isn't great (although his linemates were constantly changing). I see him more of a D grade, definitely not F, but, as I write this, I realized it is such a small detail lol
capsfan2121, NoVaSpartan and MVC liked this.
Jan. 6, 2023 at 12:47 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 5,322
Likes: 5,746
Quoting: All_Knowing
Totally agree with NAK and Snively assessment. I actually think NAK is ranked perfectly - he has come in and done a fine-ish job in his role. Irwin and McM are ranked appropriately as well. I initially thought McM should be in F grade, but not having played consistently and not playing his natural position does not help.

The only thing I would slightly disagree with is Eller being an F. I have probably been one of few Caps fans who is "softer" on Eller (as I am with Carlson as well), but Eller has been the best Cap in the faceoff dot (almost 54%), and has been quite good on PKs. Yes, his penalty numbers are bad and only 15 points isn't great (although his linemates were constantly changing). I see him more of a D grade, definitely not F, but, as I write this, I realized it is such a small detail lol


Yeah, I can get putting Eller in D, and I would tend to agree. Eller is only truly in F as a benchmark for every other player to be compared to. His PK abilities and faceoffs are probably enough to realistically pull him out of F tier.
All_Knowing liked this.
Jan. 6, 2023 at 12:50 p.m.
#5
Skip skibbity
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2016
Posts: 2,288
Likes: 887
I'd bump Irwin up to mediocre. He's pretty steady back there and you hardly ever notice him (in a good way.) He's nothing special but I don't think he's been bad. Everything else looks spot on in my opinion.
NoVaSpartan and All_Knowing liked this.
Jan. 6, 2023 at 12:53 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 5,322
Likes: 5,746
Quoting: Highlander1
I'd bump Irwin up to mediocre. He's pretty steady back there and you hardly ever notice him (in a good way.) He's nothing special but I don't think he's been bad. Everything else looks spot on in my opinion.


Fair. I bounced between D and C for Irwin, but in my opinion, he's started to lose some steam recently. C grade would still be fair for him, though.
Jan. 6, 2023 at 1:37 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,393
Likes: 1,928
Irwin up, Dowd up, Fehervary down, McMichael down
Jan. 6, 2023 at 1:44 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 5,322
Likes: 5,746
Quoting: qc14
Irwin up, Dowd up, Fehervary down, McMichael down


Could see and at least semi agree (I'm going to move Dowd up, thought I put him in tier 1 but clearly not) with all but Fehervary this year. I think Feh has been very sneaky good, especially at covering up other players flaws. He's had a few struggles but overall I think he's been very solid. Maybe lower in tier 2 but I've had no real issue with him and I personally wouldn't move him down to tier 3.
Jan. 6, 2023 at 2:36 p.m.
#9
Always have 2018
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,043
Likes: 942
Report cards spot on. Gus, Milano, and Lindgren have been the biggest pleasant surprises in my book. I thought Strome would be great here and he will continue to get better as he gets more comfortable. Hope we sign Strome to at least 5 more years and get Milano and Gus resigned.
NoVaSpartan liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll