SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Meier Rumour Trade Possibility

Created by: TheLand
Published: Jan. 6, 2023 at 5:58 p.m.
Salary Cap: $82,500,000
Season Days: 97/185 (52%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has been rejected because the upper limit has been exceeded by one of the trade parties

Logo of the San Jose SharksSan Jose Sharks

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Meier, TimoSan Jose SharksNHL20%$4,800,000011---39211738--
Suess, C.J.San Jose SharksMinor-$0011---1000--
2023 4th round pick (Logo of the San Jose SharksSJS)---001------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Kämpf, DavidToronto Maple LeafsNHL-$1,500,000011---3941115--
Robertson, NicholasWaivers ExemptToronto Maple LeafsLTIR-$796,667011---15235--
Villeneuve, WilliamWaivers ExemptToronto Maple LeafsMinor-$0011---0000--
2023 1st round pick (Logo of the Toronto Maple LeafsTOR)---100------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$1,659,1672349723615
Change$3,300,00001110-1
Final$4,959,167 (↑)2350 (↑)73 (↑)4 (↑)614 (↓)-15-3-18

Logo of the Toronto Maple LeafsToronto Maple Leafs

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Kämpf, DavidToronto Maple LeafsNHL-$1,500,000011---3941115--
Robertson, NicholasWaivers ExemptToronto Maple LeafsLTIR-$796,667011---15235--
Villeneuve, WilliamWaivers ExemptToronto Maple LeafsMinor-$0011---0000--
2023 1st round pick (Logo of the Toronto Maple LeafsTOR)---100------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Meier, TimoSan Jose SharksNHL20%$4,800,000011---39211738--
Suess, C.J.San Jose SharksMinor-$0011---1000--
2023 4th round pick (Logo of the San Jose SharksSJS)---001------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$1,885,0002349683411
Change-$3,300,0000-1-1-101
Final-$1,415,000 (↓)2348 (↓)67 (↓)2 (↓)412 (↑)15318
Jan. 6, 2023 at 6:01 p.m.
#1
Driedger Clan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 250
TOR 1st is conditional in which if TOR makes it to Conference Finals it will be a 1st but if not it'll be a 2nd in 2024. But they might do something with him resigning as the conditions instead but this is just my idea of it.
Jan. 6, 2023 at 6:05 p.m.
#2
Ok
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 115
Likes: 54
Quoting: TheLand
TOR 1st is conditional in which if TOR makes it to Conference Finals it will be a 1st but if not it'll be a 2nd in 2024. But they might do something with him resigning as the conditions instead but this is just my idea of it.


If the only thing that you change in this deal is that condition then San Jose has even more reason to decline this. Meier is worth a 1st and a top prospect. At this point, can’t even call Robertson a top prospect. I think SJ says no either way.
MoxNix, glarson17, Finn2016 and 1 other person liked this.
Jan. 6, 2023 at 9:20 p.m.
#3
Suh_Baud
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 445
Likes: 35
Unfortunately, that's not even close to enough, and Leafs can't afford him
Jan. 6, 2023 at 9:45 p.m.
#4
Suh_Baud
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 445
Likes: 35
Quoting: TheLand
TOR 1st is conditional in which if TOR makes it to Conference Finals it will be a 1st but if not it'll be a 2nd in 2024. But they might do something with him resigning as the conditions instead but this is just my idea of it.


Turns into 3 1st's if Leafs win 1 round
Jan. 6, 2023 at 10:06 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,303
Likes: 3,712
Quoting: TheLand
TOR 1st is conditional in which if TOR makes it to Conference Finals it will be a 1st but if not it'll be a 2nd in 2024. But they might do something with him resigning as the conditions instead but this is just my idea of it.


Hahahaha that’s even worse. Sharks decline that so fast you can’t even cry about it.
Jan. 6, 2023 at 11:54 p.m.
#6
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,678
Likes: 11,480
Heh. Source for this "rumour", please?
Jan. 7, 2023 at 12:30 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,303
Likes: 3,712
Quoting: mokumboi
Heh. Source for this "rumour", please?


Source: trust me bro
mokumboi liked this.
Jan. 9, 2023 at 10:23 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Driedger Clan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 250
Quoting: mokumboi
Heh. Source for this "rumour", please?


I follow lots of NHL stuff and one has to do with trade rumours. Instead of Kampf they said Engvall and some other prospect rather than Villeneuve
Jan. 9, 2023 at 10:26 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Driedger Clan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 250
Quoting: JDCapfriendly4life
If the only thing that you change in this deal is that condition then San Jose has even more reason to decline this. Meier is worth a 1st and a top prospect. At this point, can’t even call Robertson a top prospect. I think SJ says no either way.


Alot of analytics beg to differ that Robertson is still a top prospect. TOR just had good forward depth that he could only play when players started getting injured. He needs to be on a team where he'll get more playing time
Jan. 9, 2023 at 11:09 a.m.
#10
Bobby Baccala
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 125
Likes: 10
Quoting: TheLand
Alot of analytics beg to differ that Robertson is still a top prospect. TOR just had good forward depth that he could only play when players started getting injured. He needs to be on a team where he'll get more playing time


Sharks decline this trade either way, they may have NJ competing against TOR who is possibly offering Holtz and a 2023 1st
Jan. 9, 2023 at 11:27 a.m.
#11
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,678
Likes: 11,480
Quoting: TheLand
Alot of analytics beg to differ that Robertson is still a top prospect.


Such as... ?
Jan. 9, 2023 at 12:22 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,303
Likes: 3,712
Quoting: TheLand
Alot of analytics beg to differ that Robertson is still a top prospect. TOR just had good forward depth that he could only play when players started getting injured. He needs to be on a team where he'll get more playing time


Quoting: mokumboi
Such as... ?


Again the source: trust me bro
Jan. 9, 2023 at 12:45 p.m.
#13
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,678
Likes: 11,480
Quoting: glarson17
Again the source: trust me bro


I looked at his limited analytics and I'm not sure what he's referring to. And there's no gurus I've seen who think this is a top prospect, if they ever did.
Jan. 9, 2023 at 3:04 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Driedger Clan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 250
Quoting: mokumboi
I looked at his limited analytics and I'm not sure what he's referring to. And there's no gurus I've seen who think this is a top prospect, if they ever did.


Bro it was friday when i posted this i dont remember my source or how to find it again
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll