SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

WPG Goes for the Cup with their Current Core

Created by: MrConvenient
Published: Jan. 29, 2023 at 5:11 p.m.
Salary Cap: $82,500,000
Season Days: 74/185 (40%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has been rejected because the upper limit has been exceeded by one of the trade parties

Logo of the San Jose SharksSan Jose Sharks

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Meier, TimoSan Jose SharksNHL-$6,000,000011---51282048--
Benning, MatthewSan Jose SharksNHL-$1,250,000011---4912021--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Heinola, VilleWaivers ExemptWinnipeg JetsMinor-$0011---10011--
Lambert, BradWaivers ExemptWinnipeg JetsJunior-$0001---0000--
2023 1st round pick (Logo of the Winnipeg JetsWPG)---100------
2024 2nd round pick (Logo of the Winnipeg JetsWPG)---010------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$1,831,6672250733615
Change$7,250,000-2-10110
Final$9,081,667 (↑)20 (↓)49 (↓)734 (↑)7 (↑)15-29-39-68

Logo of the Winnipeg JetsWinnipeg Jets

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Heinola, VilleWaivers ExemptWinnipeg JetsMinor-$0011---10011--
Lambert, BradWaivers ExemptWinnipeg JetsJunior-$0001---0000--
2023 1st round pick (Logo of the Winnipeg JetsWPG)---100------
2024 2nd round pick (Logo of the Winnipeg JetsWPG)---010------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Meier, TimoSan Jose SharksNHL-$2,400,000011---51282048--
Benning, MatthewSan Jose SharksNHL-$500,000011---4912021--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$2,063,2382342573511
Change-$2,900,000210-1-10
Final-$836,762 (↓)25 (↑)43 (↑)572 (↓)4 (↓)11293968
Jan. 29, 2023 at 5:15 p.m.
#1
Windjammer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 16,041
Likes: 7,137
You're not getting 3 firsts and a 2nd for a rental winger.
Jan. 29, 2023 at 5:54 p.m.
#2
glarson17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,252
Likes: 3,692
I don’t see the value for San Jose here
Jan. 29, 2023 at 7:59 p.m.
#3
Dom1422
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 1,314
Likes: 285
I wouldn’t take this deal if I’m San Jose. Couple good but not great prospects, late 1st… Nah.

Most likely will be a worse team trading for Meier who have better prospects or a higher 1st rounder to offer.
Jan. 30, 2023 at 11:00 a.m.
#4
necas2svechnikov
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 36
Likes: 13
Quoting: glarson17
I don’t see the value for San Jose here


What’s there not to see? This would easily be their best return. 3 1sts and a 2nd. One who should’ve went around top 10 last year and one nearly a ppg in the AHL as a 21 year old d man. This is a great return for them.
Jan. 30, 2023 at 11:09 a.m.
#5
necas2svechnikov
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 36
Likes: 13
Quoting: Dom1422
I wouldn’t take this deal if I’m San Jose. Couple good but not great prospects, late 1st… Nah.

Most likely will be a worse team trading for Meier who have better prospects or a higher 1st rounder to offer.


It’s interesting to me how so many people agree with the NJ mock trades of Mukhamadullin and a 1st yet so far the majority of people don’t like this trade. Lambert + Heinola on top of a 1st is better than any package the 3 metro teams interested will offer.

The worst team that could trade for Meier is Buffalo, and you’re still looking at a high 10’s pick if that’s the case. I wouldn’t be too concerned with that either. A first is a first and 30 is the new 20 in this class.
Jan. 30, 2023 at 11:22 a.m.
#6
glarson17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,252
Likes: 3,692
Quoting: necas2svechnikov
What’s there not to see? This would easily be their best return. 3 1sts and a 2nd. One who should’ve went around top 10 last year and one nearly a ppg in the AHL as a 21 year old d man. This is a great return for them.


3 firsts where? Are we looking at the same trade? Lambert should not have been top 10 and he’s proving that by continuing to do nothing. San Jose could have had him twice in the draft and didn’t take him. Heinola is worth a 2nd I’m sure. Benning is worth that himself if not more. And that 1st is later. Rather keep a cheap top 4 dman and a star power forward
Jan. 30, 2023 at 11:45 a.m.
#7
necas2svechnikov
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 36
Likes: 13
Quoting: glarson17
3 firsts where? Are we looking at the same trade? Lambert should not have been top 10 and he’s proving that by continuing to do nothing. San Jose could have had him twice in the draft and didn’t take him. Heinola is worth a 2nd I’m sure. Benning is worth that himself if not more. And that 1st is later. Rather keep a cheap top 4 dman and a star power forward


Lambert, Heinola, and the 2023 first. There's your 3.

Also, not sure where you're getting Benning's high value from. He is not good. Your rebuttal is probably points, so let me just stop you ahead of time. He's on pace for 20 primary points. Not sure who is giving up a second for that.

It's funny how all Sharks fans would rather "keep" Timo than trade him for all these packages when the real choice is trade him or lose him.
Jan. 30, 2023 at 12:18 p.m.
#8
glarson17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,252
Likes: 3,692
Quoting: necas2svechnikov
Lambert, Heinola, and the 2023 first. There's your 3.

Also, not sure where you're getting Benning's high value from. He is not good. Your rebuttal is probably points, so let me just stop you ahead of time. He's on pace for 20 primary points. Not sure who is giving up a second for that.

It's funny how all Sharks fans would rather "keep" Timo than trade him for all these packages when the real choice is trade him or lose him.


Where is it trade him or lose him? He’s an RFA he isn’t going anywhere. Sharks can afford him too so idk what you’re talking about. Benning makes $1.25 mil with years left and is a top 4 Dman, 21 points ties a career high already. Points are points, primary or not.

Lambert isn’t worth a 1st today guaranteed
Jan. 30, 2023 at 1:26 p.m.
#9
necas2svechnikov
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 36
Likes: 13
Quoting: glarson17
Where is it trade him or lose him? He’s an RFA he isn’t going anywhere. Sharks can afford him too so idk what you’re talking about. Benning makes $1.25 mil with years left and is a top 4 Dman, 21 points ties a career high already. Points are points, primary or not.

Lambert isn’t worth a 1st today guaranteed


“Points are points, primary or not.” 💀 I can see how far your hockey knowledge extends.

Lambert is 100% a 1st in a 2022 redraft. Judging someone off half a season, let alone a JUNIORS season, is crazy talk.
Jan. 30, 2023 at 2:43 p.m.
#10
glarson17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,252
Likes: 3,692
Quoting: necas2svechnikov
“Points are points, primary or not.” 💀 I can see how far your hockey knowledge extends.

Lambert is 100% a 1st in a 2022 redraft. Judging someone off half a season, let alone a JUNIORS season, is crazy talk.


He’s been bad for years
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll