Tough to say you don’t mind meaningful debate when you post something crazy and then get super defensive instantly

Never got defensive at all. I replied with my reasoning and evidence. You replied emotionally that it was team destroying with legit no reasoning.

Again:
Garland > Frederic
Toews > Nosek

Carlo > Schenn but Fairly comparable to Forbort imo. I stated reasons.

Keep trying though, or take the L amd admit you are a troll.

This is just funny? And you topped it off with the stupid gen z, “take the L.” Didn’t want to throw, “bruh,” in there?

No one is going to think this is a good idea, are we all trolls?the ACGM is just genuinely dumb, and you were being hyper defensive. Settle down.

I think you're confused honestly. There is no trolling going on here. If you think comments being critical of your decisions/opinions are trolls, then I'm not sure what to tell you.

Literally the first comment on this acgm is saying these deals are terrible for BOS, and it's from a Leafs fan of all people LOL. So it's not just "us two".

The one thing I don't understand when acgm's say "that's your opinion", isn't that the whole point of posting an acgm? To get the opinions from others so that we can all pick pieces from everyones opinion to conclude what is most realistic/logical? Otherwise why post the acgm at all if you don't like what people have to say about it?

Don't be upset when the trade deadline passes and BOS does none of these trades. And then hopefully you'll understand why these trades weren't done in hindsight.

Ahahahahhahahah.

Gen Z? Lol.

A for effort and T for nice try

"The first guy..." would it make you feel better if I said you two and the toronto guy? Notice he isn't still in conversation?

I didn't say "that's your opinion like you think or are attempting to make it sound. I said that's fine, but don't Act like it's more than that. I left out the word act. you are acting like you are factually correct while providing zero evidence to back your opinion. Yet, you maintain a holier than thou attitude. It's trollish.

You're like beavis and butthead.
"This sucks"
"Yeah"
"Heh heh"
"Yeah"

Not defensive. Lime I said no issues if you hate it and tell me, but don't use made up logic or facts to justify.

What did you make up?
- they are not in worse cap shape. Pretty close, but they gain about 500k - 1m+ in space. 1.15 QO for frederic, but he seems like he's looking at 1.75+ for next deal. Carlo's at 4.1 vs 4.95 for Garland. You do lose a spot, but let's have Lysell in his spot.


Honestly - Carlo, Debrusk Frederic, Smith and Reilly are the most likely to be traded - not saying they will, but if they do end up going after a big name like chychrun or a meier. Couple of those names are probably going the other way.

Oh, I won't be upset at all if these trades don't happen. I think you miss the point of the acgm. It's fun. It's ideas. It's not a job application. I am not hoping for this. Cam isn't going to see this and offer you Sweeney's job

Cheers bruh

You're the only one using made up "logic or facts" to justify these moves. Which is exactly why none of this would happen in real life, because it isn't realistic.

I'm not commenting on all of these Boston acgm's hoping for Cam to call me up offering a job. I comment my opinions to help the acgm realize that we don't live in a fairytale and explain why these moves won't or will happen based on what we do know about the team, such as current player performances, cap management, asset management, etc. The whole point of acgm's is to better educate eachother and come up with interesting ideas/talking points about the team and what direction makes the most sense for the team to go.

Obviously you're pretty upset about our comments on your acgm, otherwise you wouldn't be dragging on this conversation over multiple days if this acgm was just for fun.