SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Go Chefs Great houdly moodly

Created by: Bubblhead82
Team: 2022-23 St. Louis Blues
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 12, 2023
Published: Feb. 12, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
FLA
  1. Krug, Torey
  2. 2023 1st round pick (NYR)
2.
STL
  1. Knies, Matthew [Reserve List]
  2. 2023 1st round pick (TOR)
TOR
  1. Barbashev, Ivan ($1,125,000 retained)
  2. O'Reilly, Ryan ($3,750,000 retained)
3.
STL
  1. 2023 3rd round pick (BUF)
VGK
  1. Acciari, Noel
  2. 2024 4th round pick (NYR)
4.
STL
  1. 2024 7th round pick (WSH)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
2024
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WSH
2025
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$82,500,000$71,051,666$1,100,000$165,000$11,448,334
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,800,000$5,800,000
LW, RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$2,800,000$2,800,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$835,833$835,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$2,800,000$2,800,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,525,000$1,525,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$750,000$750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$750,000$750,000
LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$795,000$795,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$808,333$808,333
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$950,000$950,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,275,000$3,275,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$750,000$750,000
LD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 12, 2023 at 8:21 a.m.
#1
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 11,827
Likes: 3,142
ROR and Barbashev are not getting Knies
MitchJr liked this.
Feb. 12, 2023 at 8:41 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 221
Likes: 53
Quoting: RipNasty
ROR and Barbashev are not getting Knies


Pretty sure it’s the other way around. Knies is a B+ Prospect not an A+ (or even and A prospect honestly) he has lots of upside and has the most value of any Leafs prospect. But he isn’t alone getting 2 impact players.

Honestly the value is there in the trade. That said I still wouldn’t do it from a Leafs stand point. They need to divide their assets to fill more gaps. One deal like this while it fills 2 holes (top 6 quality left side and third line veteran depth with lots of playoff experience) I think filling the hole in the top 4 D is more important.
Feb. 12, 2023 at 8:46 a.m.
#3
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 11,827
Likes: 3,142
Quoting: jempey82
Pretty sure it’s the other way around. Knies is a B+ Prospect not an A+ (or even and A prospect honestly) he has lots of upside and has the most value of any Leafs prospect. But he isn’t alone getting 2 impact players.

Honestly the value is there in the trade. That said I still wouldn’t do it from a Leafs stand point. They need to divide their assets to fill more gaps. One deal like this while it fills 2 holes (top 6 quality left side and third line veteran depth with lots of playoff experience) I think filling the hole in the top 4 D is more important.


You are either one of those "everything tied to the leafs is crap" people or just ill informed. Knies is very much a top prospect. Everyone says so. So no, ROR is not getting Knies and Barbashev isn't worth more than a 2nd.
Feb. 12, 2023 at 8:47 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 3,625
Likes: 1,221
No chance Leafs spend Knies + 1st on ROR & Barb. First, both are rentals and Dubas just said he wouldn’t do that. Second ROR is having a bad year, not the time you sell high. Third Barbashev is overrated and overhyped (happens at this time of year 🧐)…Engvall has more goals than him this year and his playoff stats (3G, 9P in 50 games) are downright embarrassing
Feb. 12, 2023 at 8:55 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 221
Likes: 53
Quoting: RipNasty
You are either one of those "everything tied to the leafs is crap" people or just ill informed. Knies is very much a top prospect. Everyone says so. So no, ROR is not getting Knies and Barbashev isn't worth more than a 2nd.


I am neither ill informed or a Leafs pessimist. Knies while a good prospect with high upside, at this point without any real prove it moments remains a B+ prospect which makes him a top prospect, but not the kind of A+ prospect that has unmatched trade value. So in this case he is not going to get 2 guys on his own with impact potential even if both are having down years.

However if they do move him which I am sure is not high on the teams list I am in agreement that it will be in a different kind of trade. One that brings in a player with Term that is a much bigger impact overall both this playoff push and next season.
Feb. 12, 2023 at 9:43 a.m.
#6
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 11,827
Likes: 3,142
Quoting: jempey82
I am neither ill informed or a Leafs pessimist. Knies while a good prospect with high upside, at this point without any real prove it moments remains a B+ prospect which makes him a top prospect, but not the kind of A+ prospect that has unmatched trade value. So in this case he is not going to get 2 guys on his own with impact potential even if both are having down years.

However if they do move him which I am sure is not high on the teams list I am in agreement that it will be in a different kind of trade. One that brings in a player with Term that is a much bigger impact overall both this playoff push and next season.


You are not worth talking to
Feb. 12, 2023 at 9:50 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 221
Likes: 53
Quoting: RipNasty
You are not worth talking to


Seems like you could have just said nothing rather than this reply if I’m not worth talking too. But just so I can see where you’re coming from on your stance that Knies is a can’t miss prospect, since you have offered nothing in the way of reasoning so far. What are you basing this can’t miss status on?
Feb. 12, 2023 at 9:53 a.m.
#8
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 11,827
Likes: 3,142
Quoting: jempey82
Seems like you could have just said nothing rather than this reply if I’m not worth talking too. But just so I can see where you’re coming from on your stance that Knies is a can’t miss prospect, since you have offered nothing in the way of reasoning so far. What are you basing this can’t miss status on?


Knies is a high end prospect everyone says so. While I don't know how good he'll be, his ceiling is extremely high which is why everyone wants him, and why Dubas doesn't want to give him up. But let's just pretend he's a B prospect so you can get him for nothing eh?
Feb. 12, 2023 at 10:06 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 221
Likes: 53
Quoting: RipNasty
Knies is a high end prospect everyone says so. While I don't know how good he'll be, his ceiling is extremely high which is why everyone wants him, and why Dubas doesn't want to give him up. But let's just pretend he's a B prospect so you can get him for nothing eh?


I never said he was any kind of throw in prospect at all. I in fact said he has value and rated him as a B+ prospect which is a quite high rating for a guy that hasn’t signed with the team yet and was a second round pick in his draft year.

He has zero pedigree to call him a can’t miss (or A level prospect) he hasn’t played any pro style hockey at this point so it is hard to tell what he will be when the competition level changes, and it is that unknown quantity that means he doesn’t have A level value. Sure any team would like to have a guy that has upside and top 6 power forward potential. But to assume he would carry the value of an A/A+ prospect (reserved for guys who are top 10 picks generally and are seen as imminently entering the league with immediate potential star status) is a major reach is what I am saying.
AC14 liked this.
Feb. 12, 2023 at 10:38 a.m.
#10
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 11,827
Likes: 3,142
Quoting: jempey82
I never said he was any kind of throw in prospect at all. I in fact said he has value and rated him as a B+ prospect which is a quite high rating for a guy that hasn’t signed with the team yet and was a second round pick in his draft year.

He has zero pedigree to call him a can’t miss (or A level prospect) he hasn’t played any pro style hockey at this point so it is hard to tell what he will be when the competition level changes, and it is that unknown quantity that means he doesn’t have A level value. Sure any team would like to have a guy that has upside and top 6 power forward potential. But to assume he would carry the value of an A/A+ prospect (reserved for guys who are top 10 picks generally and are seen as imminently entering the league with immediate potential star status) is a major reach is what I am saying.


Leading the NCAA in goals, no pedigree eh? Go away
Feb. 12, 2023 at 11:01 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 221
Likes: 53
Quoting: RipNasty
Leading the NCAA in goals, no pedigree eh? Go away


Check your stats chief he currently sits T-7 in goal scoring and T-23 in pts. But thanks for furthering my point for me. He is a good prospect, he is not an elite prospect.

Any other shots in the dark you wanna take?
Feb. 12, 2023 at 11:43 a.m.
#12
Rip
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 11,827
Likes: 3,142
Quoting: jempey82
Check your stats chief he currently sits T-7 in goal scoring and T-23 in pts. But thanks for furthering my point for me. He is a good prospect, he is not an elite prospect.

Any other shots in the dark you wanna take?


Go away troll
Feb. 13, 2023 at 8:18 a.m.
#13
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 5,322
Likes: 5,746
You might be able to get a slight bit more for Greiss, but Washington has 3 goalies they already trust so I don't see it being from them.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll