SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

New reports

Created by: pensfan21
Team: 2022-23 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 28, 2023
Published: Feb. 28, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Reports are that we have had discussions regarding JT Miller. 100% I would not do this trade. The contract is way way too much. I think it would be very bad for us long term
Trades
VAN
    First plus more
    Buyouts
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2023
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the NJD
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the FLA
    Logo of the TOR
    2024
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    2025
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the PIT
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    24$82,500,000$80,585,592$0$0$1,914,408
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $8,700,000$8,700,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $5,125,000$5,125,000
    RW, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $6,100,000$6,100,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    RW, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $2,750,000$2,750,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $3,125,000$3,125,000
    RW, C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $900,000$900,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $2,200,000$2,200,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $750,000$750,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $750,000$750,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $5,250,000$5,250,000
    C, LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $4,100,000$4,100,000
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $2,343,750$2,343,750
    RD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $4,025,175$4,025,175
    LD
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $6,100,000$6,100,000
    RD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $1,800,000$1,800,000
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $2,750,000$2,750,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $800,000$800,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $825,000$825,000
    LD
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
    $775,000$775,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 2

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:01 p.m.
    #1
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 9,687
    Likes: 4,536
    I agree 100%. I would stay far away.

    That said, if I'm playing devil's advocate, this may be a trade that facilitates Chychrun. If VAN took Dumoulin it frees up the space and roster spot for Chychrun.
    pensfan21 liked this.
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:01 p.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2023
    Posts: 2,344
    Likes: 1,202
    The man just put up 99 points for a pathetic team. Who cares about long term. Go all in while the big 3 are still playing. Besides, when they retire I’d rather us be terrible and her high picks than us be mediocre for years to come.
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:02 p.m.
    #3
    Lenny7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 13,291
    Likes: 11,051
    Think I'd be less worried about "long term", and more worried about the next 2-3 years. Hextall/Burke doubled down by giving those contracts to Letang/Malkin/Rust. Whatever it takes for picks/prospects to improve this roster should be 100% available, whether it's for JT Miller, or whoever.
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:03 p.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2015
    Posts: 87
    Likes: 8
    Considering Hextall said no big assets for rentals "that decision has been made" I would say this is just noise.
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:05 p.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 646
    Likes: 292
    Vancouver would have to retain a little bit to make it plausible.
    Penz87 liked this.
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:06 p.m.
    #6
    Ex Nucks fan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 17,615
    Likes: 17,624
    Quoting: Astoria
    Considering Hextall said no big assets for rentals "that decision has been made" I would say this is just noise.


    Well Miller isn't a rental...
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:06 p.m.
    #7
    Ex Nucks fan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 17,615
    Likes: 17,624
    Quoting: PensGMwannabe
    Vancouver would have to retain a little bit to make it plausible.


    There is no chance they retain for 8 years
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:06 p.m.
    #8
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 3,632
    Likes: 1,271
    Quoting: Lenny7
    Think I'd be less worried about "long term", and more worried about the next 2-3 years. Hextall/Burke doubled down by giving those contracts to Letang/Malkin/Rust. Whatever it takes for picks/prospects to improve this roster should be 100% available, whether it's for JT Miller, or whoever.


    I still wouldn't do it for the short term. His contract next year will prevent us from making any big change to the team. This roster needs help in more than 1 area. Would rather have 8 mil extra to improve the bottom 6 and D
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:12 p.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2022
    Posts: 646
    Likes: 292
    Quoting: Juiceman
    There is no chance they retain for 8 years


    If that's the case, then the Pens need to send some money back in the trade.

    McGinn, Rutta ++ for Miller and Schenn type of deal perhaps?
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:15 p.m.
    #10
    Ex Nucks fan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 17,615
    Likes: 17,624
    Quoting: PensGMwannabe
    If that's the case, then the Pens need to send some money back in the trade.

    McGinn, Rutta ++ for Miller and Schenn type of deal perhaps?


    I could see McGinn, Dumo, 1st, later picks for that
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:15 p.m.
    #11
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2023
    Posts: 238
    Likes: 101
    Quoting: Juiceman
    There is no chance they retain for 8 years


    I agree it would be dumb for Vancouver to retain, but if they really want him off their books after just signing him, that's what would have to happen. Either you ride out that 8 million for 8 years or you retain some and ride out that retention for 8 years. I never really understood why they signed up to that contract in the first place. I mean I know he had that 99 point season, but I can't imagine that is the standard for the next 8 years.
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:15 p.m.
    #12
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 9,687
    Likes: 4,536
    Quoting: Juiceman
    There is no chance they retain for 8 years


    Well it would be retaining on the old contract. Retention only counts on the current contact.
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:15 p.m.
    #13
    Ex Nucks fan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 17,615
    Likes: 17,624
    Quoting: pensfan21
    I still wouldn't do it for the short term. His contract next year will prevent us from making any big change to the team. This roster needs help in more than 1 area. Would rather have 8 mil extra to improve the bottom 6 and D


    Hextall seems to have doubled down on this core...
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:20 p.m.
    #14
    Ex Nucks fan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 17,615
    Likes: 17,624
    Quoting: Penz87
    I agree it would be dumb for Vancouver to retain, but if they really want him off their books after just signing him, that's what would have to happen. Either you ride out that 8 million for 8 years or you retain some and ride out that retention for 8 years. I never really understood why they signed up to that contract in the first place. I mean I know he had that 99 point season, but I can't imagine that is the standard for the next 8 years.


    Seeing as how Horvat for 8.5 for 8 years for much worse production over their careers says otherwise. If Miller was a UFA, likely a lot of teams would give him 8 mil
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:20 p.m.
    #15
    Ex Nucks fan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 17,615
    Likes: 17,624
    Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
    Well it would be retaining on the old contract. Retention only counts on the current contact.


    Wrong. I suggest you review retention rules
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:22 p.m.
    #16
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2019
    Posts: 7,903
    Likes: 6,400
    Ya'll are fu*ked when Crosby and Malkin retire anyways. Miller gonna be worth his contract for the next few seasons he just didn't make sense for the Canucks to sign. It makes a lot of sense for teams like the Pens and Canes to be interested. It's hilarious seeing people acting as if Miller is an albatross when he would get at least an 8x7 on the open market this offseason.
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:23 p.m.
    #17
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 3,632
    Likes: 1,271
    Quoting: Juiceman
    Hextall seems to have doubled down on this core...


    Then that's even more reason to focus on improving the D and bottom 6, which I think would help the team much more than Miller
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:32 p.m.
    #18
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2015
    Posts: 87
    Likes: 8
    Miller aint bad but for teams like the Pens and Canes they cant even call players off LTIR because of the cap situation. I dont see how they can take an 8m caphit and still fill out the rest of their teams properly.
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:34 p.m.
    #19
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2021
    Posts: 3,632
    Likes: 1,271
    Quoting: Astoria
    Miller aint bad but for teams like the Pens and Canes they cant even call players off LTIR because of the cap situation. I dont see how they can take an 8m caphit and still fill out the rest of their teams properly.


    I dont think he's bad at all. Just dont think it's the right move for us given how many holes we have in the lineup
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:41 p.m.
    #20
    Pens are better
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2022
    Posts: 1,889
    Likes: 598
    Source?
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 12:45 p.m.
    #21
    Lenny7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 13,291
    Likes: 11,051
    Quoting: pensfan21
    I still wouldn't do it for the short term. His contract next year will prevent us from making any big change to the team. This roster needs help in more than 1 area. Would rather have 8 mil extra to improve the bottom 6 and D


    I mean, you've got $14.5 mil to add 6 players if there was no actual skaters sent to Van in this deal. I'd imagine there'd be money going the other way to offset.

    I don't know...the Pens are a team with flaws...hard to fix 'em all.
    Feb. 28, 2023 at 1:39 p.m.
    #22
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 9,687
    Likes: 4,536
    Quoting: Juiceman
    Wrong. I suggest you review retention rules


    Are you sure? What is the guidance you're using for that?
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll