SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bruins 2324 conservative

Created by: BRUINS_STAN_MAN
Team: 2023-24 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 5, 2023
Published: Mar. 5, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,500,000
3$875,000
2$1,000,000
3$2,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,000,000
2$1,750,000
2$1,750,000
Trades
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the LAK
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2025
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$85,500,000$86,500,833$4,500,000$0-$1,000,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$11,250,000$11,250,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$863,333$863,333
RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,687,500$3,687,500
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,137,500$1,137,500
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$875,000$875,000
G
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 5, 2023 at 11:19 a.m.
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,350
Likes: 10,681
Calgary is adding cap which they can't afford to do
BRUINS_STAN_MAN liked this.
Mar. 5, 2023 at 11:20 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,843
Likes: 8,856
Flames and Hall both decline.
Mar. 5, 2023 at 11:21 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,553
Likes: 19,690
Copy/pasting from the last thread since you chose not to read it

Horrible for Calgary. They are already above the cap for next season with Lindholm's super cheap deal. How are they supposed to afford the more expensive Hall and pay Swayman's raise? Not to mention trading Lindholm completely negates the entire purpose of bringing in Kadri to begin with. To push Backlund down to the 3C role to run a more complete top 9
Mar. 5, 2023 at 11:30 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,897
Likes: 14,582
That is a super terrible trade for Calgary
Mar. 5, 2023 at 11:48 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Trading Jeremy swayman is not a conservative move.
Mar. 5, 2023 at 12:07 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 29
Likes: 4
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Copy/pasting from the last thread since you chose not to read it

Horrible for Calgary. They are already above the cap for next season with Lindholm's super cheap deal. How are they supposed to afford the more expensive Hall and pay Swayman's raise? Not to mention trading Lindholm completely negates the entire purpose of bringing in Kadri to begin with. To push Backlund down to the 3C role to run a more complete top 9


To be fair, I posted this before I saw your comment
Mar. 5, 2023 at 12:08 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 29
Likes: 4
Quoting: Gofnut999
Flames and Hall both decline.


Hall only has a modified no trade clause. He can only choose a 10 team no trade list
Mar. 5, 2023 at 12:10 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 29
Likes: 4
Quoting: DefenseFirst
Trading Jeremy swayman is not a conservative move.


They need a 1/2 C. They also have 2 goalie prospects with top 10 save percentages in the ahl. I dont think its unreasonable to trade a goalie you'll have to pay when you're limited with cap space. Especially given the year Ullmark is having
Mar. 5, 2023 at 12:12 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: BRUINS_STAN_MAN
They need a 1/2 C. They also have 2 goalie prospects with top 10 save percentages in the ahl. I dont think its unreasonable to trade a goalie you'll have to pay when you're limited with cap space. Especially given the year Ullmark is having


Cool.

Trading Jeremy swayman is not a conservative move.
Mar. 5, 2023 at 12:15 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,553
Likes: 19,690
Quoting: BRUINS_STAN_MAN
To be fair, I posted this before I saw your comment


And I posted this before you responded to the first comment, happens
BRUINS_STAN_MAN liked this.
Mar. 5, 2023 at 12:17 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 786
Likes: 207
Do you really think Bergeron is back next season? This seems like his last go. Could he be back and be productive? Absolutely but considering he was close to retiring last off season I don't expect to see him back. Either way what a career for him.

Could see them moving swayman if they get a C back. I don't ever count out Boston, but if they lose their top 2 centers they will need one. If O'Reilly reaches FA I'd expect them to be interested. I'd have to do some research on other potential options.
BRUINS_STAN_MAN liked this.
Mar. 5, 2023 at 12:32 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 29
Likes: 4
Quoting: In_it_to_winnik
Do you really think Bergeron is back next season? This seems like his last go. Could he be back and be productive? Absolutely but considering he was close to retiring last off season I don't expect to see him back. Either way what a career for him.

Could see them moving swayman if they get a C back. I don't ever count out Boston, but if they lose their top 2 centers they will need one. If O'Reilly reaches FA I'd expect them to be interested. I'd have to do some research on other potential options.


He's a legend.

At the beginning of the season I thought this was his last go for sure. I've kind of come around to the idea that he might come back for one more. I think the coaching change has a lot do with it. They seem to be having so much fun, playing looser, and having success.

Whether or not he's able to perform at a top level will remain to be seen. This is why I think they need to make a move for a center this off season. It hasn't been officially reported but Krejci isn't coming back. I guess he only wanted one year back here.

So bc Krejci is gone, you'd need to fill either 2c or slide zacha to 2c and fill the hole at 2lw. Hypothetically, you could get away with re-signing bertuzzi but if Bergeron leaves then you have a massive hole.
In_it_to_winnik liked this.
Mar. 5, 2023 at 1:31 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 786
Likes: 207
Quoting: BRUINS_STAN_MAN
He's a legend.

At the beginning of the season I thought this was his last go for sure. I've kind of come around to the idea that he might come back for one more. I think the coaching change has a lot do with it. They seem to be having so much fun, playing looser, and having success.

Whether or not he's able to perform at a top level will remain to be seen. This is why I think they need to make a move for a center this off season. It hasn't been officially reported but Krejci isn't coming back. I guess he only wanted one year back here.

So bc Krejci is gone, you'd need to fill either 2c or slide zacha to 2c and fill the hole at 2lw. Hypothetically, you could get away with re-signing bertuzzi but if Bergeron leaves then you have a massive hole.


I hope he's back, but let's say he isn't. Really curious what happens there. Centers are few and far between. With retention I wonder if they look at Nashville for Duchene/RJ. Sharks say hertl is untouchable.... but he'd be a great fit and they wanted him. Logan couture at retention? Still a decent player. Philly has Hayes, but I don't think he is a bruin type guy. Couturier on the other hand would be absolutely perfect. I really hope his career isn't over with all the injuries. If he's healthy that is such a great fit. Nick schmaltz might work, but he's a winger/center combo. The easy fix is to have Bergeron, but the conversation of the team moving forward without him has to be had imo.
BRUINS_STAN_MAN liked this.
Mar. 5, 2023 at 1:41 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,843
Likes: 8,856
Quoting: BRUINS_STAN_MAN
Hall only has a modified no trade clause. He can only choose a 10 team no trade list


And 50/50 Calgary would be on it. Would not matter anyway. Flames decline. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Mar. 5, 2023 at 1:49 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 29
Likes: 4
Quoting: In_it_to_winnik
I hope he's back, but let's say he isn't. Really curious what happens there. Centers are few and far between. With retention I wonder if they look at Nashville for Duchene/RJ. Sharks say hertl is untouchable.... but he'd be a great fit and they wanted him. Logan couture at retention? Still a decent player. Philly has Hayes, but I don't think he is a bruin type guy. Couturier on the other hand would be absolutely perfect. I really hope his career isn't over with all the injuries. If he's healthy that is such a great fit. Nick schmaltz might work, but he's a winger/center combo. The easy fix is to have Bergeron, but the conversation of the team moving forward without him has to be had imo.


Yes, I agree. The conversation 100% needs to be addressed. They're all in this year, which I fully support. Its a travesty that bergy only has one cup. But this also puts the team in a bind for next year when the window is still very open. So they are going to have to be very creative in order to fill the center position. I think they could get away with losing one center (Krejci or Bergeron) but not both without making a big move. I think their biggest trade asset is Swayman. So if you can acquire a legitimate 1/2C, I think you have to do it. But you don't trade him for less than a deal for 1/2C. I like Sway but I view him as a luxury if Ullmark continues his dominant play and the apparent strength in the system.
Mar. 5, 2023 at 3:34 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 5,519
Likes: 1,528
Quoting: Gofnut999
And 50/50 Calgary would be on it. Would not matter anyway. Flames decline. 🤷🏻‍♂️


Think it’s probably more like 90/10 calgary is on it.
Mar. 5, 2023 at 3:46 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,843
Likes: 8,856
Quoting: DefenseFirst
Think it’s probably more like 90/10 calgary is on it.


He’s from Calgary. Probably was a Flames fan as a kid. Otherwise i’d agree.
BRUINS_STAN_MAN liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll