Both teams decline. Kings can't afford Ullmark and Korpisalo's numbers are better than Ullmark's since joining the Kings(Yes, I know Ullmark is better) but Kings can resign Korpisalo for cheaper and give up nothing.

Also Turcotte is not ready to be a 2C, he can't stay healthy.

12 games to Turcotte’s name and he is the B’s 2nd line center? Seems a bit crazy

The Bruins will have $4.65 in overages, you're way over the cap. They'll have to move 1 or 2 other contracts to be cap compliant.

I think if they do move Ullmark, that is the sort of return they will want, 1st or equivalent and a young center or RD prospect. I hate that Accari signing, they didn't sign him after 19 because he wanted term, they're not giving him 3 years at his age. They have multiple C prospects who will be gunning for the 4C spot.

Since March 1st when LAK acquired Korpisalo:

Korpisalo - 0.937 SV% / 8.07 GSAA / 221 SA
Ullmark - 0.933 SV% / 8.96 GSAA / 270 SA

So Ullmark has faced more shots and has a better GSAA since March 1st. The difference in their SV% (based on Ullmark's SA) would be 1 additional save.

Boston not trading Ullmark for that.

Wow you really spent all that time grabbing those stats for barely any difference. Typical Boston fan. Enjoy the rebuild next year

All that time? lol, no, that took me less than 2 minutes to find. As for next year, I'll worry about it then. I'm enjoying this historic season the Bruins are having right now.