No, to move up from 16-11 Is about a 2nd sitting at 47 and a 3rd or 4th and we send back a 3rd or 4th. Garland won’t cost a 2nd to move, so this trade is not worth it to us, a comp could be garland and rathbone for FC as Dylan Coghlan is a very comparable player to Rathbone but the Canucks aren’t over the cap with our LTIR and we aren’t exceeding the 10% maximum. And garland isn’t a negative value deal, he just isn’t a surplus deal

That Arizona trade is miles off

Bruins take that. Nedeljkovic had a bad year but he signs for more than that still. Competitive package for ARZ whether you trade down in the draft or stand pat and use that pick, but I don't think Keller is on the market. The organization needs guys who will buy in and he's probably the only guy

Woah baby you are putting it all on green running that goaltending duo lol