I think the Leafs would do that, not sure if the Rangers would.

Goodrow will reject. Remove him and insert Kakko with Schneider.

Lol Schneider, Kakko, Laffy and Miller for Nylander and Robertson? You’re out of your mind

No you're just ignoring it from the TOR perspective. Nylander straight up for a top pair RD is what makes sense. You aren't offering that and therefore TOR would want A LOT of pieces especially from an in conference contender. The originally proposed offer would get rejected as it makes TOR worse.

Nylander isn’t worth 4 first round picks lmao. Leaving the rangers with 3 spots to fill after the fact

I don't think it makes sense for NYR either. HOWEVER, I am demonstrating what TOR would ask for from an in-conference contender that isn't providing an optimal return. Hence why in conference contenders almost never trade much less for major pieces.

Rangers reject. Miller is a top LD, Laffy is a top LW for Nylander a top 6 C/RW. Robertson and Goodrow have the same value, mind yeah at least Goodrow will play for you unlike Robertson being on the IR.

I wouldn't trade you Laffy str8 up for 1 year of Nylander.
I wouldn't trade you Miller str8 up for 1 year of Nylander.

If the rangers gave up those 4 kids for Nylander, Toronto wins that trade by a landslide

Goodrow will reject. Remove him and insert Kakko with Schneider.

Trades aren't made in a vacuum and it is a zero sum league. GMs have ownership and media considerations- ESPECIALLY in Toronto. Toronto wouldn't want to trade Nylander to an in-conference contender. Again, go back and look at major trades made, notice that in-conference contenders rarely make those trades? There's a reason for that. Maybe if Nylander publicly said he would only extend in NYR then you might get this trade. If Miller were a RD then I would say it would be possible. Miller is a second pairing LD for Toronto. Nylander is the best value of their big four on a cap tight team. Treliving MUST get a landslide victory to make this trade with NYR otherwise he will be crushed by media and ownership.

I'm not a fan of either team of any of the players involved. I'm as unbiased as they come here.

Nylander comes with an 8 yr extension, so you actually have him for 9, not 1.

Laf is not proven to be more than a 3rd liner at this point, but has upside to become top 6. Nylander was 20th in league scoring this past year and has 74 G the last 2 seasons, which is certainly top line quality. He can also play C in a pinch while being a RH shot which NYR only has 1 of out of its top 6 wingers.

Miller is a top 4 Dman, but not a "top LD". He could become a 1st pairing LD, yes, but I don't think anybody is expecting him to be a Norris contender at any point (which would make him a "top LD").

Lastly, Goodrow here is a cap dump, actually. Robertson has relatively low value in the scheme of things.

You could say the same about the Rangers. Drury would have his head on a spike in NY if he made that trade. New Yorkers are intense about their sports teams, which is why Broadway is not for everyone

Which just reinforces my original opinion that these two teams would almost never make any big trades.

Correct. Well toronto fans seem to want goodrow for some reason lol

Are they trying to acquire him in other ACGMs also? I'm gonna be honest, I didn't really check other ACGM's for Goodrow trades before posting this.

I'm not a fan of either team of any of the players involved. I'm as unbiased as they come here.

Nylander comes with an 8 yr extension, so you actually have him for 9, not 1.

Laf is not proven to be more than a 3rd liner at this point, but has upside to become top 6. Nylander was 20th in league scoring this past year and has 74 G the last 2 seasons, which is certainly top line quality. He can also play C in a pinch while being a RH shot which NYR only has 1 of out of its top 6 wingers.

Miller is a top 4 Dman, but not a "top LD". He could become a 1st pairing LD, yes, but I don't think anybody is expecting him to be a Norris contender at any point (which would make him a "top LD").

Lastly, Goodrow here is a cap dump, actually. Robertson has relatively low value in the scheme of things.

Trouba was brutal year last year which effected Miller overall stats. Had been cleaning up all of Trouba's mistake. With that being said, he still gets 43 points without being on the PP time and you only can imagine what them stats would be if he was on the PP. It's his Def that really stands out if you watch him.

Laffy is so much better then what the stats are showing. We're under playing him because we have LW Kreider & LW Panarin. It's not because he's not good enough on why he's not playing top LW. It's because of this damn peeking order this Rangers teams has, which is extremely frustrating. Watch for Kreider to be playing 3rd line LW next year. Rangers first line Laffy-Mika-Kakko next year. Then what will the naysayer say now.

That's the different from being a Rangers fan to not being one. Because you didn't know any of this. Miller is a top LD and Laffy is a top LW.