Fair enough what are you expecting him to sign for though?
I didn't; just stating why someone would vote no possibly.
I think Bjornfot is more valuable than minimum but not in LA who has 2 or 3 guys ahead of him for that 7th spot. Almost anywhere else he would be on an NHL roster easily
I didn't; just stating why someone would vote no possibly.
I think Bjornfot is more valuable than minimum but not in LA who has 2 or 3 guys ahead of him for that 7th spot. Almost anywhere else he would be on an NHL roster easily
Sorry I meant you collectively . Give me your number you would say is fair to the player
Sorry I meant you collectively . Give me your number you would say is fair to the player
Minimum $825k per year (comps being PO Joseph in Pittsburgh) although Bjornfot had way more NHL games under his belt at the same age/contract year so could argue for more than that.
They bought up another year for him without really paying anything to get it. He should have taken a 1 year deal at minimum and worse case scenario is he gets the same thing next year or he has a great year and nabs a 3rd pair spot or fills in great due to injury and can get his bag. There was no benefit to signing a multi-year deal at league minimum.
Most likely the league minimum increases with the cap next year also so he might have missed out just on that alone.
Minimum $825k per year (comps being PO Joseph in Pittsburgh) although Bjornfot had way more NHL games under his belt at the same age/contract year so could argue for more than that.
They bought up another year for him without really paying anything to get it. He should have taken a 1 year deal at minimum and worse case scenario is he gets the same thing next year or he has a great year and nabs a 3rd pair spot or fills in great due to injury and can get his bag. There was no benefit to signing a multi-year deal at league minimum.
Most likely the league minimum increases with the cap next year also so he might have missed out just on that alone.