Thank you all for your comments, especially when the post does not involve a real trade.
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
If ALL of those player do well, then losing a few of them wouldn’t matter anyways
We’re in ... REALLY GOOD SHAPE
Quoting: Skyraider112
We have such a plethora of prospects up front that we have the luxury of letting them marinate in the AHL if we want them to be a part of the future or letting them develop and then trading them for players that fill organizational holes. A guy like Mittelstadt is likely replaced unless he signs a team friendly deal. If he has another great season, we could flip him for a RHD
Quoting: BUFF36
Interesting Ideas, I would hope Strbak is atleast in the pipeline by then with Rochester. Yes we have the luxury of some really good prospects coming. But evaluations will need to be at a utmost for the next couple years. Can let some marinate a bit, but you can't wait to long because they lose there value. Mitts and Krebs need to keep growing and adding to what they did this past year. There are only so many seats at the table and there's a bunch of young players that want those chairs.
Quoting: worldwidesensei
With the team camaraderie, I think you can ask the RFAs to sign a 1 or 2 year deal, if need be, and wait for when there is more cap space available. Or you can sign them to incredibly team-friendly long-term deals ...That's why I'm all in favor of letting the prospects sizzle....
First, as you can see Greenway and Olofsson were obvious cap casualties.
Greenway needs to really pick up his game, and Olofsson's skill set is replaced by Kulich at 1/5 the cap for the next three years.
Second, not because I expect him to do poorly, but because he is six and half years older than Benson, Casey could become the next cap casualty.
Third, In two years, let's hope either
Strbak or McCarthy are NHL ready then Clifton could be move just as Lyubushkin was when better players were added to the line up.
Fourth, Let's presume we allow Rosen, Ostlund and Kulich to
sizzle or marinate one more year, then who do we get to replace them, Hinnostroza or others of similar talent?
Fifth, Yes moving on from Skinner would free up sufficient cap to sign Power (as you can see in the description, his contract expires the same year as Power's), as Owen will over half Jeff's cap relief when he signs in four years for $11,000,000 or more leaving only $3,500,000 to spread around.
Looking to the next year (2025'26) without moving on from Skinner and presuming $2,000,000 cap increase, Strbak replacing Clifton adds about $2,500,000, plus this year's surplus of about $2,000,000 gives the Sabres about $6,500,000 to spread among Benson, Savoie and Tuch.
Trading Casey at the end of this season is the most logical solution and replacing him with an ELC.
Dropping his predicted $4,500,000 and replacing that with $900,000 would give the Sabres $10,000,000 to spread among 9, 93 (Bridge deals about $4,500,000) and 89 (8 years at $8,000,000) could be reasonable.
Allow me to editorialize.
How can we expect any player to take a team friendly contract in the future when Rasmus did not?
How is he worth more than Makar?
Tage and Dylan set the standard, he did not follow their lead, IMO very selfish and disappointing.
While unintentional I was taken aback when I read
marinate and sizzle to describe our prospects.
They are not pieces of
meat or chess pieces who can be sacrificed for the greater good.
Keeping them in the minors for an extra year, takes money away from them as they remain on their ELC's for an extra year.
Players have feelings, they are people, keeping them down on the farm may help the team but it will not make them team loyal.
I am done with my weekly tome, sorry if any one is offended.