SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

GMDA 2024-2025

Created by: buffdaddy
Team: 2024-25 St. Louis Blues
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 3, 2023
Published: Nov. 3, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$825,000
3$925,000
3$950,000
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$900,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
2$925,000
1$900,000
2$3,250,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$825,000
Trades
1.
STL
  1. Akey, Beau
Additional Details:
Traded during 2023-2024 season
Warren Foegele
EDM
    Kasperi Kapanen 50% retained
    Jakub Vrana 50% retained
    Calle Rosen
    2.
    STL
    1. 2025 4th round pick (TBL)
    Additional Details:
    2025 4th RD pick becomes 2025 3rd RD pick if TB reaches ECF
    TBL
      Traded during 2023-2024 season
      Samuel Blais
      3.
      STL
      1. Bar, Jack [Reserve List]
      2. Faksa, Radek
      3. 2024 2nd round pick (DAL)
      4. 2025 5th round pick (DAL)
      Additional Details:
      Traded during 2023-2024 season
      2025 5th RD pick is conditional if DAL reaches WCF
      DAL
        Robert Bortuzzo
        Warren Foegele
        4.
        STL
        1. Podkolzin, Vasily [RFA Rights]
        2. 2025 2nd round pick (VAN)
        Additional Details:
        Tyler Myers
        VAN
        1. Faulk, Justin
        Additional Details:
        Traded during 2023-2024 season
        Oskar Sundqvist
        5.
        STL
        1. Eller, Lars
        2. 2026 2nd round pick (PIT)
        Additional Details:
        Traded at 2024 draft
        6.
        STL
        1. Rehkopf, Carson [Reserve List]
        2. 2025 1st round pick (SEA)
        3. 2025 3rd round pick (SEA)
        Additional Details:
        2025 1st RD pick is top 10 protected
        2025 3rd RD pick becomes 2026 2nd RD pick if SEA reaches conference semifinals
        SEA
        1. Buchnevich, Pavel
        Additional Details:
        Traded during 2024-2025 season
        7.
        STL
        1. Fabbro, Dante [RFA Rights]
        NSH
        1. 2024 2nd round pick (DAL)
        2. 2025 5th round pick (DAL)
        Additional Details:
        Traded at 2024 draft
        DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
        2024
        Logo of the STL
        Logo of the STL
        Logo of the TOR
        Logo of the STL
        Logo of the NYR
        Logo of the STL
        Logo of the STL
        Logo of the STL
        2025
        Logo of the STL
        Logo of the SEA
        Logo of the STL
        Logo of the VAN
        Logo of the STL
        Logo of the SEA
        Logo of the STL
        Logo of the TBL
        Logo of the STL
        Logo of the STL
        2026
        Logo of the STL
        Logo of the STL
        Logo of the PIT
        Logo of the STL
        Logo of the STL
        Logo of the STL
        Logo of the STL
        Logo of the STL
        ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
        23$87,500,000$66,301,666$0$1,212,500$21,198,334
        Left WingCentreRight Wing
        Logo of the St. Louis Blues
        $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$412,500$412K)
        LW
        RFA - 2
        Logo of the St. Louis Blues
        $8,125,000$8,125,000
        C, RW
        UFA - 7
        Logo of the St. Louis Blues
        $950,000$950,000
        RW, C
        RFA
        Logo of the St. Louis Blues
        $1,250,000$1,250,000
        LW, RW
        RFA - 1
        Logo of the St. Louis Blues
        $6,500,000$6,500,000
        C, LW
        NTC
        UFA - 4
        Logo of the St. Louis Blues
        $8,125,000$8,125,000
        RW
        UFA - 7
        Logo of the St. Louis Blues
        $835,833$835,833
        LW, RW
        RFA - 1
        Logo of the St. Louis Blues
        $950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$800,000$800K)
        C
        RFA - 2
        $900,000$900,000
        RW, LW
        RFA - 2
        Logo of the St. Louis Blues
        $900,000$900,000
        C
        RFA
        Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
        $2,450,000$2,450,000
        C
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the St. Louis Blues
        $852,500$852,500
        C
        RFA - 2
        Logo of the Dallas Stars
        $3,250,000$3,250,000
        C, LW
        M-NTC
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the St. Louis Blues
        $825,000$825,000
        C, RW
        UFA
        Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
        Logo of the St. Louis Blues
        $925,000$925,000
        LD
        RFA
        Logo of the St. Louis Blues
        $6,500,000$6,500,000
        RD
        NTC
        UFA - 6
        Logo of the St. Louis Blues
        $6,000,000$6,000,000
        G
        M-NTC
        UFA - 3
        Logo of the St. Louis Blues
        $4,000,000$4,000,000
        LD
        NTC
        UFA - 2
        $3,250,000$3,250,000
        RD
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the St. Louis Blues
        $775,000$775,000
        G
        RFA - 1
        Logo of the St. Louis Blues
        $6,500,000$6,500,000
        LD
        NTC
        UFA - 3
        Logo of the St. Louis Blues
        $800,000$800,000
        LD/RD
        RFA - 1
        Logo of the St. Louis Blues
        $775,000$775,000
        RD
        RFA - 2

        Embed Code

        • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
        • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

        Text-Embed

        Click to Highlight
        Nov. 3, 2023 at 5:28 p.m.
        #1
        Big Shoots
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Sep. 2020
        Posts: 3,573
        Likes: 1,087
        Justin Faulk has negative trade value
        Nov. 3, 2023 at 6:33 p.m.
        #2
        mokumboi
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2019
        Posts: 29,407
        Likes: 11,387
        Quoting: BigShoots
        Justin Faulk has negative trade value


        Hahaha what???
        Nov. 3, 2023 at 7:45 p.m.
        #3
        Big Shoots
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Sep. 2020
        Posts: 3,573
        Likes: 1,087
        Quoting: mokumboi
        Hahaha what???


        Haha oh no is this news to you? His underlying metrics are bad. I don't think you'll find a team that is looking to take on 4 yrs of him a 6.5. If you could get rid of him for nothing thatd be a big win.
        Nov. 3, 2023 at 7:54 p.m.
        #4
        mokumboi
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2019
        Posts: 29,407
        Likes: 11,387
        Quoting: BigShoots
        Haha oh no is this news to you? His underlying metrics are bad. I don't think you'll find a team that is looking to take on 4 yrs of him a 6.5. If you could get rid of him for nothing thatd be a big win.


        Heh. You should try watching hockey. It's fun.
        Nov. 4, 2023 at 1:13 a.m.
        #5
        Big Shoots
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Sep. 2020
        Posts: 3,573
        Likes: 1,087
        Quoting: mokumboi
        Heh. You should try watching hockey. It's fun.


        I watch my team. And its pretty rare that the data get it wrong I have to say. But that doesn't dissuade every fan thinking the player they're trading is far more valuable than they actually are.

        Screenshot-2023-04-03-at-12.53.47-PM.png
        Nov. 4, 2023 at 12:24 p.m.
        #6
        mokumboi
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2019
        Posts: 29,407
        Likes: 11,387
        Quoting: BigShoots
        I watch my team. And its pretty rare that the data get it wrong I have to say. But that doesn't dissuade every fan thinking the player they're trading is far more valuable than they actually are.

        Screenshot-2023-04-03-at-12.53.47-PM.png



        Hahahaha! Dom's model is NOT data. It's entirely subjective, entirely based on a highly flawed on-ice stat (not individual). Just because that clown acts like it's gospel does not make it so. Meanwhile, Faulk is coming off a career high in points...

        And let's be very clear: you somehow imagine he's worth absolutely nothing, if not negative value. Thats what I'm debating against. But sure, pretend I'm saying he's worth a ton.
        Nov. 4, 2023 at 4:00 p.m.
        #7
        Big Shoots
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Sep. 2020
        Posts: 3,573
        Likes: 1,087
        Quoting: mokumboi
        Hahahaha! Dom's model is NOT data. It's entirely subjective, entirely based on a highly flawed on-ice stat (not individual). Just because that clown acts like it's gospel does not make it so. Meanwhile, Faulk is coming off a career high in points...

        And let's be very clear: you somehow imagine he's worth absolutely nothing, if not negative value. Thats what I'm debating against. But sure, pretend I'm saying he's worth a ton.


        Ok you might have to unpack how his model is "based entirely on highly flawed on-ice stats" that seems like hyperbole. It's fun to say that but please explain yourself. I don't think it is Gospel by any means. It's just another tool, another data set to use.

        The case against his value is he makes 6.5 mil for 4 more yrs and is the wrong side of 30. And he doesn't defend well. He may have marginal value he may have none. Just depends on timing and who needs what.

        Take for instance Sean Durzi. He's 24, makes 1.7 mil, and does basically everything Faulk can do and he cost a 2nd.
        Nov. 4, 2023 at 6:59 p.m.
        #8
        mokumboi
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2019
        Posts: 29,407
        Likes: 11,387
        Quoting: BigShoots
        Ok you might have to unpack how his model is "based entirely on highly flawed on-ice stats" that seems like hyperbole. It's fun to say that but please explain yourself. I don't think it is Gospel by any means. It's just another tool, another data set to use.

        The case against his value is he makes 6.5 mil for 4 more yrs and is the wrong side of 30. And he doesn't defend well. He may have marginal value he may have none. Just depends on timing and who needs what.

        Take for instance Sean Durzi. He's 24, makes 1.7 mil, and does basically everything Faulk can do and he cost a 2nd.


        Hahaha what??? Durzi defends well, but Faulk doesn't? Like I said, you should watch hockey instead of reading analytics.

        And yes, xG is a deeply flawed stat that isn't even an individual stat. Obviously.
        Nov. 4, 2023 at 11:34 p.m.
        #9
        Big Shoots
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Sep. 2020
        Posts: 3,573
        Likes: 1,087
        Quoting: mokumboi
        Hahaha what??? Durzi defends well, but Faulk doesn't? Like I said, you should watch hockey instead of reading analytics.

        And yes, xG is a deeply flawed stat that isn't even an individual stat. Obviously.


        I said Durzi does what Faulk does, while being far younger and far cheaper. And he returned a 2nd. Did you have anything to say to that? If you can articulate yourself im happy to have a convo.

        Why do you say all this data is so useless? Your point is what Krug isn't a good player and is dragging him down? Rest of the team is awful?

        Are you equally shocked every team employs analytics teams?
        Nov. 5, 2023 at 4:55 p.m.
        #10
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Feb. 2023
        Posts: 962
        Likes: 408
        Quoting: BigShoots
        I said Durzi does what Faulk does, while being far younger and far cheaper. And he returned a 2nd. Did you have anything to say to that? If you can articulate yourself im happy to have a convo.

        Why do you say all this data is so useless? Your point is what Krug isn't a good player and is dragging him down? Rest of the team is awful?

        Are you equally shocked every team employs analytics teams?


        Mokumboi will choose ignore objective statistics for players and instead swear that his singular eye test holds more merit. A common theme with him.
        BigShoots liked this.
        Nov. 5, 2023 at 4:59 p.m.
        #11
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Feb. 2023
        Posts: 962
        Likes: 408
        Quoting: mokumboi
        Hahahaha! Dom's model is NOT data. It's entirely subjective, entirely based on a highly flawed on-ice stat (not individual). Just because that clown acts like it's gospel does not make it so. Meanwhile, Faulk is coming off a career high in points...

        And let's be very clear: you somehow imagine he's worth absolutely nothing, if not negative value. Thats what I'm debating against. But sure, pretend I'm saying he's worth a ton.


        Doms model is not subjective at all.... Athletic combines stats like xG, toi relative to qot/qoc, and then funnels those stats into percentiles based on players in similar positions.

        It'd be much easier if you said you had no idea what you're talking about lmao.
        BigShoots liked this.
        Nov. 5, 2023 at 5:52 p.m.
        #12
        Big Shoots
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Sep. 2020
        Posts: 3,573
        Likes: 1,087
        Quoting: dougford
        Mokumboi will choose ignore objective statistics for players and instead swear that his singular eye test holds more merit. A common theme with him.


        Haha Ok thank you. I was trying to give the guy the benefit of the doubt and let him explain himself but I had a feeling this might be the case.
         
        Reply
        To create a post please Login or Register
        Question:
        Options:
        Add Option
        Submit Poll