SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

buyers

Created by: svensk_forskare
Team: 2023-24 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 12, 2023
Published: Nov. 12, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
currently just ahead of the yotes in points% for the 8 seed
no i dont think its sustainable but wouldnt it be fun
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. Carrier, Alexandre
  2. Novak, Thomas
  3. 2024 4th round pick (NSH)
NSH
  1. Zegras, Trevor
  2. 2024 7th round pick (ANA)
2.
ANA
  1. Klingberg, John
  2. 2024 5th round pick (TOR)
  3. 2025 3rd round pick (TOR)
Additional Details:
Cap Dump
TOR
  1. 2024 4th round pick (ANA)
Additional Details:
Cap Dump
3.
ANA
  1. Boqvist, Adam
  2. 2025 7th round pick (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. 2024 5th round pick (ANA)
  2. 2025 3rd round pick (ANA)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the ANA
2025
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the CBJ
2026
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$70,563,750$0$7,225,000$12,936,250
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,650,000$3,650,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,250,000$6,250,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,250,000$3M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,456,250$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$800,000$800,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,295,000$1,295,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$425,000$425,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$775,000$775,000
RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$550,000$550K)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$687,500$687,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$812,500$812,500
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$925,000$925K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,300,000$2,300,000
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$775,000$775,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,150,000$4,150,000 ($3,000,000$3M$3,000,000$3M)
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$896,667$896,667 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
RFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,100,000$1,100,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$775,000$775,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 12, 2023 at 5:26 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2023
Posts: 2,981
Likes: 590
Leafs accept, probably could keep your 4th too and they’d still accept lol

Ducks decline though
Nov. 12, 2023 at 5:31 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 16,749
Likes: 12,926
3 just bad trades for Anaheim

You still have time to delete this
OldNYIfan liked this.
Nov. 12, 2023 at 5:31 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 126
Likes: 144
Quoting: Kinger25
Leafs accept, probably could keep your 4th too and they’d still accept lol

Ducks decline though


ducks have so much extra cap space, and theyll accrue more as the season goes along... no reason not to pick up a few more picks for a contract they can bury
Kinger25 liked this.
Nov. 12, 2023 at 5:33 p.m.
#4
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2023
Posts: 2,981
Likes: 590
Quoting: svensk_forskare
ducks have so much extra cap space, and theyll accrue more as the season goes along... no reason not to pick up a few more picks for a contract they can bury


Oh sorry I meant ducks decline to that zegras deal yeah makes sense to take on cap dumps for some extra picks for sure
svensk_forskare and OldNYIfan liked this.
Nov. 12, 2023 at 5:48 p.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 16,292
Likes: 8,961
Garbage offer for Trevor Zegras.

And trading for Klingberg and Boqvist, Is a major mistake.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Nov. 12, 2023 at 6:09 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 126
Likes: 144
Quoting: MoSeider53
Garbage offer for Trevor Zegras.

And trading for Klingberg and Boqvist, Is a major mistake.


Zegras is playing terrible, so if the premise is buying, Novak and Carrier make the team better. No they won't realistically buy, but if they did, the value isn't that far off for the way Novak is playing now and the way Zegras is playing now...

Quoting: svensk_forskare
ducks have so much extra cap space, and theyll accrue more as the season goes along... no reason not to pick up a few more picks for a contract they can bury


and the klingberg deal is because why would we not use our extra cap space to get picks? what purpose is there to letting 10M of cap space go to waste? might as well add picks and bury him
Kinger25 liked this.
Nov. 12, 2023 at 6:13 p.m.
#7
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 7,662
Quoting: svensk_forskare
Zegras is playing terrible, so if the premise is buying, Novak and Carrier make the team better. No they won't realistically buy, but if they did, the value isn't that far off for the way Novak is playing now and the way Zegras is playing now...



and the klingberg deal is because why would we not use our extra cap space to get picks? what purpose is there to letting 10M of cap space go to waste? might as well add picks and bury him


He's apparently been playing through an injury, and he's been working heavily on his defensive game at the coaches request. it's also kind of clear hes not meshing with Leo and Troy.

But Z only gets moved for a young, top pairing RHD, Seider, Dobson, etc type player, not carrier and a 3C we frankly don't need.
OldNYIfan and Kinger25 liked this.
Nov. 12, 2023 at 6:16 p.m.
#8
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41,700
Likes: 26,416
So we trade away our #1 center for a #3 center and a #3 RhD?!?!?

Not in this lifetime.

We can do without Novak until Isac Lundestrom returns. We can do without Carrier until Jamie Drysdale returns. We can do without Boqvist and Klingberg forever, and if anyone takes on Klingberg as a cap dump, it won't be for the piddling return of exchanging a 2024 fourth for a 2025 third -- wow!!! What a misevaluation!!!

Quoting: svensk_forskare
the klingberg deal is because why would we not use our extra cap space to get picks? what purpose is there to letting 10M of cap space go to waste? might as well add picks and bury him

"add picks"?!?!? A fifth is a dart throw, and the value of a 2024 fourth is almost as much as a 2025 third.

"Adding picks" means getting a second and a third for nothing.
KingofRnR liked this.
Nov. 12, 2023 at 6:18 p.m.
#9
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2023
Posts: 2,981
Likes: 590
Just letting you know I’m stealing this idea but dropping the 4th going to Toronto for my post tomorrow, thanks
svensk_forskare liked this.
Nov. 12, 2023 at 6:27 p.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2023
Posts: 2,981
Likes: 590
Quoting: MoSeider53
Garbage offer for Trevor Zegras.

And trading for Klingberg and Boqvist, Is a major mistake.


Hey I even said they can take the 4th back no need to send that doesn’t make sense obviously if they do send it Toronto still does that all day long and he’s got a point why not use the cap space you have to acquire more picks
svensk_forskare liked this.
Nov. 12, 2023 at 9:51 p.m.
#11
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 35,124
Likes: 21,321
Quoting: Kinger25
Leafs accept, probably could keep your 4th too and they’d still accept lol

Ducks decline though


No we dont

At the TDL we can pkg him off for a return that helps us

This does not
Nov. 12, 2023 at 10:41 p.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2023
Posts: 2,981
Likes: 590
Quoting: aadoyle
No we dont

At the TDL we can pkg him off for a return that helps us

This does not


It’s a cheap payout
Nov. 12, 2023 at 10:50 p.m.
#13
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 35,124
Likes: 21,321
Quoting: Kinger25
It’s a cheap payout


In general if Klingberg goes its in a deal to get someone better coming back not a dump move

That is a waste of assets

Look at what EDM did with Barrie thats the example to use
Nov. 12, 2023 at 10:54 p.m.
#14
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2023
Posts: 2,981
Likes: 590
Quoting: aadoyle
In general if Klingberg goes its in a deal to get someone better coming back not a dump move

That is a waste of assets

Look at what EDM did with Barrie thats the example to use


I would love if we could send a 1st and a 4th and klingberg to get tanev but flames fans hate it so I’m not gonna post it anymore even though I think that gets done all day long even if we gotta pay a 3rd team 2 5ths to retain a mil and it gives us some breathing room
Nov. 12, 2023 at 11:48 p.m.
#15
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 35,124
Likes: 21,321
Edited Nov. 13, 2023 at 12:19 a.m.
Quoting: Kinger25
I would love if we could send a 1st and a 4th and klingberg to get tanev but flames fans hate it so I’m not gonna post it anymore even though I think that gets done all day long even if we gotta pay a 3rd team 2 5ths to retain a mil and it gives us some breathing room


Well they aint the GM

As we have seen with the current Flames GM his trades often dont get best value

Look at Toffoli trade

If CGY is tanking they know for some guys they will have to take on salary and a 1 year Klingberg rental is nothing lul
Kinger25 liked this.
Nov. 13, 2023 at 3:28 a.m.
#16
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 7,662
Quoting: aadoyle
In general if Klingberg goes its in a deal to get someone better coming back not a dump move

That is a waste of assets

Look at what EDM did with Barrie thats the example to use


Barrie wasn't an asset in the trade, he was cap out, and when Barrie was traded, he was considered good. ~40 points in 60 games and a -3 on the season. Klingberg is on pace for 20 points and a -28 by about the 60 game mark, add to that the HORRID season he had last year in Anaheim and just being ho-hum for Minnesota after the TDL, his stock is at an all time low. It's clear that he needs to be on a team with a strong defensive partner and a great goalie in order to work his reckless offensive style, and Toronto has neither of those, very few teams do. Ironically, I could see him fitting in in Tampa, they have the defense and the goalie to cover for him, and they could use some more offensive oomph. Maybe Minnesota will take him back. Maybe he could work in Colorado's position-less hockey system, since he doesn't seem to know his position anyway.
OldNYIfan and svensk_forskare liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll