I like the facts to be accurate

Not sure what you do for a living, but obviously you don't know how negotiations work or that there's an element of bluffing and poker involved

Yes, once Sutter was fired, they were no longer wanting or in a rush to get out of town. They've all been presented offers to consider

I read that Tanev was upset and left VAN with a sour taste in his mouth, but I never saw him say he'd love to be back in VAN... I think that's the case, but he hasn't said it

The fact is, you don't know the facts and can't seem to keep them straight even though you found the resources for (which I applaud you for, since most people are too lazy)

Flames won't rebuild, they will re-tool. Be happy that VAN is playing well right now, but whether they can maintain this current play, is still up for question, especially after losing to the Sharks. Flames have improved and are on the rise

We know what we're doing here in Calgary. Go clean up the streets of Vancouver before you worry your pretty little head about what happening in C-Town

Buddy, I've provided you source after source from trusted NHL insiders on your players wanting out of Calgary if the season continues on its current trajectory. You have provided 0 evidence to back up your statements. These are facts, hard evidence, that your players want out so badly it is reaching the most respected insiders in the league - LeBrun, Friedman, etc. Guys who don't talk out of their ass for clicks.

So you want facts to be accurate? Stop talking out of your ass and link an article or a post from a trusted NHL insider. Provide some facts.

You say the Flames have improved and are on the rise? I suppose one man's trash is another man's treasure because a .477 points % doesn't seem like an improvement or rise, to me.

Somebody's a bit cranky lol. I don't have time today to post articles, but nothing you posted is something I wasn't already aware of or told you. Go back in to that Tanev article and tell me where it says he would love to be a Canuck again. The entire article is about how VAN lead him on only to offer him scraps and low ball offer to stay, to which he was so mad he left for CGY

You think you know everything, yet you don't know much at all. You can breakdown and throw a tantrum if you'd like, but I know more about the Flames and their Players than you ever will there bud

Buddy, you still haven't shown an ounce of proof to back up your statements. I've provided links to sources that back up everything I'm saying. Flames players don't want to play in Calgary, it has been repeated by them ad nauseam. Your team is trash. The media knows it. The players know it. You're the only one not accepting of it. No one wants to play for your team.

You attack me and claim I'm throwing a tantrum when you're the one being asked for proof. You have not provided any sources. Please, provide some instead of turning to attacks when you're called out on your bull****.

Relax, you’re becoming hinged

I’ll circle back on this later, but stop pretending like you know anything. You can’t even read or interpret the “proof” you’re providing lol

Okay, thank you for admitting you don't have proof.

Here suck on this for awhile you salty baby:

Hanifin had Extension With Flames

Here suck on this for awhile you salty baby:

Hanifin had Extension With Flames

That article repeats what I already stated, Hanifin wants to see how the team does before he decides to stay.

LeBrun even says: "I still expect, for example, Hanifin to get dealt at some point," LeBrun said on SC with Jay Onrait on Tuesday. "In his case, the idea from everyone involved is that he gets dealt as a signed player – that there's an extension in place for him wherever he ends up."

Can you both stop this nonsense? I post on here attempting to fill team needs while also making proposed trades as fair as possible. No need for bickering.

I like Zads for Jersey, but don't see him as top 4. Good and part of his game is needed in Jersey, but what do you think he's gonna return?