SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Its fine

Created by: CorrosionRF
Team: 2023-24 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 30, 2023
Published: Nov. 30, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
cool
Trades
CGY
  1. 2024 3rd round pick (VAN)
  2. 2026 5th round pick (VAN)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2026
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$83,500,000$70,838,333$0$212,500$12,661,667
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$10,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,800,000$5,800,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,100,000$3,100,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$825,000$825,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,200,000$2,200,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,300,000$1,300,000
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 30, 2023 at 6:10 p.m.
#1
FKA Bigtittielarper
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 7,728
Likes: 2,226
Time for flames fans to wake up lol I’m sorry I shouldn’t say that but it is hilarious how much better all my offers were and this is what he goes for
TheAlien, Newgod77, LPProductions and 3 others liked this.
Nov. 30, 2023 at 6:15 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 984
Likes: 392
Quoting: SomeonesOffended
Time for flames fans to wake up lol I’m sorry I shouldn’t say that but it is hilarious how much better all my offers were and this is what he goes for


There are definitely a few on this app who are off their rocker on Zadorov but all Hanifin, Lindholm and Tanev proposals I've seen have been pretty decent value. (Aside from the 1 or 2 massive over/underpays) Every fanbase has those fans who overrate their guys.
SomeonesOffended liked this.
Nov. 30, 2023 at 6:41 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 666
Quoting: SomeonesOffended
Time for flames fans to wake up lol I’m sorry I shouldn’t say that but it is hilarious how much better all my offers were and this is what he goes for


Leaf fans are probably wondering why they didn't offer more. I'm wondering why we didn't wait for more? Oh well, he gone now.
Nov. 30, 2023 at 6:42 p.m.
#4
westleysnipez
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 586
Quoting: oilfire
Leaf fans are probably wondering why they didn't offer more. I'm wondering why we didn't wait for more? Oh well, he gone now.


It's because a 3rd round pick is market value for a #5 defenseman.

Like how a 2nd round pick + is the market value for Tanev.
Dahlia1001 liked this.
Nov. 30, 2023 at 6:43 p.m.
#5
FKA Bigtittielarper
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 7,728
Likes: 2,226
Quoting: oilfire
Leaf fans are probably wondering why they didn't offer more. I'm wondering why we didn't wait for more? Oh well, he gone now.


I’m surprised leafs couldn’t beat it maybe they didn’t want to deal with the ex gm I’m not sure but they have to get tanev overpay to push a deal through who cares
oilfire liked this.
Nov. 30, 2023 at 6:48 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 666
Quoting: westleysnipez
It's because a 3rd round pick is market value for a #5 defenseman.

Like how a 2nd round pick + is the market value for Tanev.


Nah, I'm not convinced Connie is done yet, I'm hoping he made a quick move to facilitate something else.

The markets whatever, explain Jeannot.

Yes, you can make reasonable assumptions but as a fan, I want Jeannot trades for all my guys.
Nov. 30, 2023 at 6:51 p.m.
#7
westleysnipez
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 586
Quoting: oilfire
Nah, I'm not convinced Connie is done yet, I'm hoping he made a quick move to facilitate something else.

The markets whatever, explain Jeannot.

Yes, you can make reasonable assumptions but as a fan, I want Jeannot trades for all my guys.


I'm pretty sure Jeannot was a favour owed by TBL to NSH. That's a weird one for sure.
oilfire liked this.
Nov. 30, 2023 at 6:52 p.m.
#8
Puckhead
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 338
How is it fine? You got nothing for something?
Nov. 30, 2023 at 7:04 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 984
Likes: 392
Quoting: GM_SZK
How is it fine? You got nothing for something?


More than we paid for him, didn't need to use a retention slot. Screwed our gm's leverage by publicly req a trade. Space to call up Soloyvov. Seems pretty fair to me.
Nov. 30, 2023 at 7:14 p.m.
#10
Puckhead
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 338
Quoting: CorrosionRF
More than we paid for him, didn't need to use a retention slot. Screwed our gm's leverage by publicly req a trade. Space to call up Soloyvov. Seems pretty fair to me.


I don’t agree, I think the trade ask was good marketing. But tbh I don’t get it, surely he is worth a 2cd, and the 3rd is in 2026.
Nov. 30, 2023 at 7:20 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 984
Likes: 392
Quoting: GM_SZK
I don’t agree, I think the trade ask was good marketing. But tbh I don’t get it, surely he is worth a 2cd, and the 3rd is in 2026.


It was and it wasn't. It brought attention to himself and probably got Conny more offers but because everyone knew he wasn't resigning those offers probably weren't as good. With all the attention on Zadorov he proceeded to have probably the worst 10 or so game stretch I have ever seen from him so that probably didn't help either. Maybe he could have got 2nd but then I think its just a late second and at that stage of the draft I would probably rather 2 picks than one. 3rd being in 2026 isn't ideal but it's still a 3rd nonetheless.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll