SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Creating a third line

Created by: Greysuits
Team: 2023-24 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 9, 2023
Published: Dec. 9, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
PHI
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (BUF)
2.
3.
BUF
    Future considerations
    4.
    BUF
      Future Considerations
      Buried
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2024
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      2025
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the MIN
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the NSH
      2026
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      Logo of the BUF
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      23$83,500,000$79,468,213$0$5,220,000$4,031,787
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $9,000,000$9,000,000
      LW, RW
      NMC
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $7,142,857$7,142,857
      C
      UFA - 7
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $7,100,000$7,100,000
      C, LW
      UFA - 7
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $855,833$855,833 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
      LW, RW
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $2,500,000$2,500,000
      LW, C
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
      RW, LW
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $3,000,000$3,000,000
      C, LW
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Nashville Predators
      $2,857,143$2,857,143
      C, RW
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
      LW
      RFA - 3
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $1,600,000$1,600,000
      LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$412,500$412K)
      C, LW
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $3,000,000$3,000,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 2
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $6,000,000$6,000,000
      LD/RD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $925,000$925,000
      LD
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Nashville Predators
      $5,000,000$5,000,000
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$1,850,000$2M)
      LD/RD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $2,500,000$2,500,000
      RD
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$925,000$925K)
      G
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $4,285,714$4,285,714
      LD
      UFA - 7
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $3,333,333$3,333,333
      RD
      UFA - 3
      ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $2,500,000$2,500,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
      RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $4,750,000$4,750,000
      RW, LW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $2,000,000$2,000,000
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $2,500,000$2,500,000
      LW, C
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
      $3,250,000$3,250,000
      RD
      UFA - 1

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 10:56 a.m.
      #1
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2021
      Posts: 15,406
      Likes: 11,789
      Philly didn’t trade Laughton for a 1 and a 2, they aren’t trading him for just a 2
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 10:56 a.m.
      #2
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2022
      Posts: 5,341
      Likes: 3,416
      Nashville obviously accepts
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 10:57 a.m.
      #3
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2022
      Posts: 5,341
      Likes: 3,416
      Quoting: GeneralLandro
      Philly didn’t trade Laughton for a 1 and a 2, they aren’t trading him for just a 2


      Do we have any actual proof they were offered a 1st+ for a career 3rd liner?
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 11:35 a.m.
      #4
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Mar. 2017
      Posts: 4,789
      Likes: 2,008
      Quoting: GeneralLandro
      Philly didn’t trade Laughton for a 1 and a 2, they aren’t trading him for just a 2


      I would say a Laughton deal revolves around a 1st and Krebs..... but Leafs fans are delusional🤣
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 11:38 a.m.
      #5
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Mar. 2017
      Posts: 4,789
      Likes: 2,008
      Quoting: Ennis
      Do we have any actual proof they were offered a 1st+ for a career 3rd liner?


      Issue here is Laughton isn't the prototypical 3rd liner.

      He suffers from what I call "Mike Ricci Syndrom": not good enough to be a permanent top 6, but too good to be a permanent bottom 6.

      3 years of Laughton at 3 million? Yeah.... that's a late 1st at least.
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 11:55 a.m.
      #6
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2022
      Posts: 5,341
      Likes: 3,416
      Quoting: swinny
      Issue here is Laughton isn't the prototypical 3rd liner.

      He suffers from what I call "Mike Ricci Syndrom": not good enough to be a permanent top 6, but too good to be a permanent bottom 6.

      3 years of Laughton at 3 million? Yeah.... that's a late 1st at least.


      I guess I wouldn't spend a 1st+ on a guy who's been a career 30pt player.
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 12:28 p.m.
      #7
      Sabres fan
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2020
      Posts: 4,870
      Likes: 3,040
      Quoting: Ennis
      Nashville obviously accepts

      Of course they do. That is at least one first round asset too many. I don’t think that highly of Colton Sissons, still like him.
      AntiAnalytics liked this.
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 12:52 p.m.
      #8
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Nov. 2017
      Posts: 27,785
      Likes: 14,518
      You could also create a 3rd line by activating tuch and not playing cozens on the wing
      AntiAnalytics liked this.
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 1:15 p.m.
      #9
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2018
      Posts: 1,521
      Likes: 769
      Wow....3 1st round picks for Saros? I mean....That's way too much. Not to mention that UPL has better stats than Saros this year...

      You're just giving away Olofsson...for nothing? Umm, he's better than Sissons...
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 1:18 p.m.
      #10
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2022
      Posts: 5,341
      Likes: 3,416
      Quoting: worldwidesensei
      You're just giving away Olofsson...for nothing? Umm, he's better than Sissons...


      Is he, though? Olofsson is a one dimensional shooter with bad possession metrics. Sissons is a defensive 3C who just happens to have more points than Olofsson.
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 1:18 p.m.
      #11
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2018
      Posts: 1,521
      Likes: 769
      Quoting: swinny
      I would say a Laughton deal revolves around a 1st and Krebs..... but Leafs fans are delusional🤣


      Now it's 2 1sts for Laughs....lol.
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 1:22 p.m.
      #12
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2018
      Posts: 1,521
      Likes: 769
      Quoting: Ennis
      Is he, though? Olofsson is a one dimensional shooter with bad possession metrics. Sissons is a defensive 3C who just happens to have more points than Olofsson.


      5v5 Pts/60

      Olofsson 2.24
      Sissons 1.34

      GF%

      Olofsson 47.62
      Sissons 40.91


      Looks considerably better to me.
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 1:26 p.m.
      #13
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Mar. 2017
      Posts: 4,789
      Likes: 2,008
      Quoting: worldwidesensei
      Now it's 2 1sts for Laughs....lol.


      Laugh, but for what Laughton is, plus that contract, it wouldn't put it beyond the realm of possibility
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 1:28 p.m.
      #14
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2022
      Posts: 5,341
      Likes: 3,416
      Quoting: worldwidesensei
      5v5 Pts/60

      Olofsson 2.24
      Sissons 1.34

      GF%

      Olofsson 47.62
      Sissons 40.91


      Looks considerably better to me.


      P/60 is irrelevant to what OP is trying create in the post. He's trying to create a more defensive third line, to which Olofsson does not fit. He is a pylon in the defensive zone.

      I'd take a 30 point defensive Sissons at 2.8 over a one dimensional 40 point Olofsson at 4.7
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 1:40 p.m.
      #15
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Nov. 2017
      Posts: 27,785
      Likes: 14,518
      Quoting: worldwidesensei
      Now it's 2 1sts for Laughs....lol.


      You love saying this.

      Erik Johnson, jokiharju, girgensons, jost ,okposo for McDavid. What? It's 5 firsts!
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 1:42 p.m.
      #16
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2018
      Posts: 1,521
      Likes: 769
      Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
      You love saying this.

      Erik Johnson, jokiharju, girgensons, jost ,okposo for McDavid. What? It's 5 firsts!


      Considering Krebs just became waivers-eligible, yes, he's worth at least a 1st...if not more.
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 1:44 p.m.
      #17
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Nov. 2017
      Posts: 27,785
      Likes: 14,518
      Quoting: worldwidesensei
      Considering Krebs just became waivers-eligible, yes, he's worth at least a 1st...if not more.


      Well, he's not. He's playing 4th line on a non playoff team in his d+5 season
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 1:48 p.m.
      #18
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2018
      Posts: 1,521
      Likes: 769
      Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
      Well, he's not. He's playing 4th line on a non playoff team in his d+5 season


      He's 14th in his draft class in points...

      I would need to wait D+5 years to only hope a 2024 1st round pick is 14th in his draft class.
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 1:58 p.m.
      #19
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2018
      Posts: 1,521
      Likes: 769
      Edited Dec. 9, 2023 at 2:03 p.m.
      5v5 GA/60:

      Laughton 3.06 (Olofsson 3.08)
      Krebs 1.53

      5v5 ATOI:

      Laughton 12:02
      Krebs 10:59

      GF%
      Laughton 42.86
      Krebs 53.33
      AntiAnalytics liked this.
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 3:30 p.m.
      #20
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2023
      Posts: 5,614
      Likes: 3,744
      Quoting: swinny
      Issue here is Laughton isn't the prototypical 3rd liner.

      He suffers from what I call "Mike Ricci Syndrom": not good enough to be a permanent top 6, but too good to be a permanent bottom 6.

      3 years of Laughton at 3 million? Yeah.... that's a late 1st at least.


      Sabres 1st won’t be “late” though
      And that makes a HUGE difference imo

      Laughton might be good enough for a LATE 1st,
      but not a MID 1st- and certainly not a mid1st + Krebs- no way
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 10:36 p.m.
      #21
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Mar. 2017
      Posts: 4,789
      Likes: 2,008
      Quoting: AntiAnalytics
      Sabres 1st won’t be “late” though
      And that makes a HUGE difference imo

      Laughton might be good enough for a LATE 1st,
      but not a MID 1st- and certainly not a mid1st + Krebs- no way


      I think that maybe undervalued Laughton. But that is me and my evaluation of Laughton and his game.

      But to suggest Laughton isn't worth a 1st I belive is an error. The player is very good. The contract is very good.

      If the Sabres were in on Laughton, either that 1st carries conditions, or Philly is adding to Laughton.

      But I definitely stand by my statement: if Philly is entertaining a move with Buffalo, it starts with a 1st and Krebs. No reason for Philly to make the deal otherwise.
      Dec. 9, 2023 at 11:35 p.m.
      #22
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2023
      Posts: 5,614
      Likes: 3,744
      Quoting: swinny
      I think that maybe undervalued Laughton. But that is me and my evaluation of Laughton and his game.

      But to suggest Laughton isn't worth a 1st I belive is an error. The player is very good. The contract is very good.

      If the Sabres were in on Laughton, either that 1st carries conditions, or Philly is adding to Laughton.

      But I definitely stand by my statement: if Philly is entertaining a move with Buffalo, it starts with a 1st and Krebs. No reason for Philly to make the deal otherwise.


      U can stand by it all you want,
      but it’s still crazy

      Laughton is an above average 3rd liner
      Maybe even a “good” one

      But he’s not worth a mid1st OR Krebs,
      let alone BOTH
      That’s just absurd to even suggest

      The Sabres don’t become a Cup Contender by adding Laughton
      Hell, he doesn’t even get them in the playoffs
      You’re overvaluing this guy like crazy

      Sabres aren’t gonna pay like that,
      just to miss the playoffs with him
      Especially not with all the forward talent we have (& have coming) who have a higher ceiling than he does
      Dec. 10, 2023 at 11:33 a.m.
      #23
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Mar. 2017
      Posts: 4,789
      Likes: 2,008
      Quoting: AntiAnalytics
      U can stand by it all you want,
      but it’s still crazy

      Laughton is an above average 3rd liner
      Maybe even a “good” one

      But he’s not worth a mid1st OR Krebs,
      let alone BOTH
      That’s just absurd to even suggest

      The Sabres don’t become a Cup Contender by adding Laughton
      Hell, he doesn’t even get them in the playoffs
      You’re overvaluing this guy like crazy

      Sabres aren’t gonna pay like that,
      just to miss the playoffs with him
      Especially not with all the forward talent we have (& have coming) who have a higher ceiling than he does


      I never claimed the Sabres should be in on him. I said IF.

      Is it a price I pay? No. But I am suggesting for where Philly is, what Laughton amd and what that contract is..... it probably takes that.

      We can agree to disagree. What is forum is all about..... different thought processes engaging.
      Dec. 10, 2023 at 2:31 p.m.
      #24
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2023
      Posts: 5,614
      Likes: 3,744
      Quoting: swinny
      I never claimed the Sabres should be in on him. I said IF.

      Is it a price I pay? No. But I am suggesting for where Philly is, what Laughton amd and what that contract is..... it probably takes that.

      We can agree to disagree. What is forum is all about..... different thought processes engaging.


      If Philly gets a return like that I’ll be shocked
      Seems u might be thinking Krebs doesn’t have much trade value- which could be right- but there’s ZERO CHANCE the Sabres will just dump him & “sell low”
      Dec. 10, 2023 at 9:18 p.m.
      #25
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Mar. 2017
      Posts: 4,789
      Likes: 2,008
      Quoting: AntiAnalytics
      If Philly gets a return like that I’ll be shocked
      Seems u might be thinking Krebs doesn’t have much trade value- which could be right- but there’s ZERO CHANCE the Sabres will just dump him & “sell low”


      Could be right, but Adams and Company are also reaching a piss or get of the pot point with Krebs.

      Kulich is coming.....
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll