SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TAKE NOTES ALLVIN

Created by: Prime_Jimbo
Team: 2023-24 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 7, 2024
Published: Jan. 7, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Sens no retention Giroux deal

Sharks fans? How greedy am I?
Trades
1.
OTT
  1. Brzustewicz, Hunter [Reserve List]
  2. Garland, Conor
  3. Kudryavtsev, Kirill
  4. 2024 1st round pick (VAN)
2.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VAN
2025
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2026
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$83,500,000$82,871,667$850,000$0$628,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C, LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,650,000$6,650,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,350,000$7,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$825,000$825,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,900,000$1,900,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$725,000$725,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,600,000$1,600,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,150,000$1,150,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,800,000$1,800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$775,000$775,000
LW
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 7 at 7:28 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 3,789
Likes: 1,208
Garland is not available.
Jan. 7 at 7:47 p.m.
#2
Hockey 1st Sens 2nd
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 3,570
Likes: 1,596
That's a pretty hefty offer for Giroux. Not sure he'd waive though.
Prime_Jimbo liked this.
Jan. 7 at 7:59 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
VAN
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 1,883
Quoting: TCMonkey
That's a pretty hefty offer for Giroux. Not sure he'd waive though.


Hopefully playing with Petey would entice him
Jan. 7 at 9:17 p.m.
#4
2018 Canucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 2,172
Likes: 747
Busting up Bleuger’s line is a set back to gain a top 6 forward & at a heavy price.

Rather see a minor trade for a 4C & a big fish RHD if available. The D could wait til the offseason.

Comes down to going all in or not.
Jan. 7 at 9:22 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
VAN
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 1,883
Edited Jan. 8 at 12:02 a.m.
Quoting: Nighthawk
Busting up Bleuger’s line is a set back to gain a top 6 forward & at a heavy price.

Rather see a minor trade for a 4C & a big fish RHD if available. The D could wait til the offseason.

Comes down to going all in or not.


I think Zetterlund would keep the 3rd line vibe going. Tenacious player, a little bigger, slightly less skill but this trade really represents the need to replace Garland as well. I'm not sure Lotto Line sticks around all year but in the playoffs it could if no top 6 winger added.
Jan. 7 at 11:12 p.m.
#6
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 927
I don't think the Sharks would trade Zet for that.
Then again, it's Grier.
Jan. 8 at 9:42 a.m.
#7
Sens
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 704
Likes: 387
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
Hopefully playing with Petey would entice him


petey wont be there next year
Jan. 8 at 9:57 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
VAN
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 1,883
Quoting: Boodin
petey wont be there next year


Good morning, thanks for the laugh
Jan. 8 at 12:54 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 5,903
Likes: 1,534
OTT has as much interest in bringing in a 4.9M$ 3rd liner as they do in bringing back zeitsev
Jan. 8 at 2:50 p.m.
#10
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 872
Quoting: goodfella
I don't think the Sharks would trade Zet for that.
Then again, it's Grier.


What do you mean it's Grier? Dude has completely revamped the future of this team. We have Zetterlund because of the MASSIVE haul that was the Timo trade.

I won't stand for any Grier slander. He's been incredible with leaning into the rebuild and getting assets back
Jan. 8 at 4:04 p.m.
#11
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 927
Quoting: AStovetop
What do you mean it's Grier? Dude has completely revamped the future of this team. We have Zetterlund because of the MASSIVE haul that was the Timo trade.

I won't stand for any Grier slander. He's been incredible with leaning into the rebuild and getting assets back


The quantity hall? Zet is a 3rd liner playing top six minutes. The two dmen are 2/3rd line dmen at best (which we didn't need to trade a top line winger to get).
The only question mark is Musty and the upcoming pick. That's up to the scouts.

We're subsidizing the eastern conference and he's left minimal flexibility on retention with any short term assets we have. He hasn't actually won big on any trades. Duclair was a cap casualty.

We are worse than we need to be during the rebuild. Hawks have more GF and less GA with arguably a worse team.

For the record, I'm not saying he has to go. I just think he's been given too much credit.
Jan. 8 at 4:20 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
VAN
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 1,883
Quoting: athrin
OTT has as much interest in bringing in a 4.9M$ 3rd liner as they do in bringing back zeitsev


I guess Zaitsev could be more imposing the Hamonic wink
Jan. 8 at 5:48 p.m.
#13
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 872
Quoting: goodfella
The quantity hall? Zet is a 3rd liner playing top six minutes. The two dmen are 2/3rd line dmen at best (which we didn't need to trade a top line winger to get).
The only question mark is Musty and the upcoming pick. That's up to the scouts.

We're subsidizing the eastern conference and he's left minimal flexibility on retention with any short term assets we have. He hasn't actually won big on any trades. Duclair was a cap casualty.

We are worse than we need to be during the rebuild. Hawks have more GF and less GA with arguably a worse team.

For the record, I'm not saying he has to go. I just think he's been given too much credit.


Zetterlund is a 3rd liner with skill and only 24. With the play he's shown this year he absolutely has top 6 potential. Okhotiuk is a 7th D-man with some room to grow. Not much I really expected more from that. Seems like you haven't watched Shakir at all. He is an absolute stud and easily projects to be a top pairing d-man. Idk what else to say about Musty, an absolute steal. Add to that a 2nd (and potential 1st) and that's an absurd haul for Timo who does nothing for our rebuild. Addison for a 5th and a MAYBE 4th liner. Turned the pick that was Geekie (11th overall) into Bystedt, Lund, and Havelid all of whom I'd say are around the value of Geekie

Did you think these guys were supposed to be difference makers this year? That would be completely counterintuitive to the trade.

He's done amazing with what he was given. Burns was playing poorly for us. He cleared cap and got assets back as well. Karlsson trade is a great for return for only 1 mil retention. Especially with Granlund playing the way he is. He also got Thrun for a f-ing 3rd. Drafting has been phenomenal. Duke was a win, even if you want to discredit it as a cap casualty. Sturm signing has been amazing. I mean I could go on and on, but he's been amazing

You should check the man-games lost to injury stats. Sharks have the most (likely taken over by Chicago after the Bedard injury now) in the league.

As for the credit he's given, I'm not sure ehat you're talking about. He's constantly being talked about the same way you are now. he's blamed for everything when most moves he's made won't pan out for 2-5 years
Jan. 9 at 12:23 a.m.
#14
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 927
Quoting: AStovetop
Zetterlund is a 3rd liner with skill and only 24. With the play he's shown this year he absolutely has top 6 potential. Okhotiuk is a 7th D-man with some room to grow. Not much I really expected more from that. Seems like you haven't watched Shakir at all. He is an absolute stud and easily projects to be a top pairing d-man. Idk what else to say about Musty, an absolute steal. Add to that a 2nd (and potential 1st) and that's an absurd haul for Timo who does nothing for our rebuild. Addison for a 5th and a MAYBE 4th liner. Turned the pick that was Geekie (11th overall) into Bystedt, Lund, and Havelid all of whom I'd say are around the value of Geekie

Did you think these guys were supposed to be difference makers this year? That would be completely counterintuitive to the trade.

He's done amazing with what he was given. Burns was playing poorly for us. He cleared cap and got assets back as well. Karlsson trade is a great for return for only 1 mil retention. Especially with Granlund playing the way he is. He also got Thrun for a f-ing 3rd. Drafting has been phenomenal. Duke was a win, even if you want to discredit it as a cap casualty. Sturm signing has been amazing. I mean I could go on and on, but he's been amazing

You should check the man-games lost to injury stats. Sharks have the most (likely taken over by Chicago after the Bedard injury now) in the league.

As for the credit he's given, I'm not sure ehat you're talking about. He's constantly being talked about the same way you are now. he's blamed for everything when most moves he's made won't pan out for 2-5 years


Burns wasn't playing poorly, the whole team was. The return for him with that retention was garbage.
EK was a terrible return. We took on cap dumps and traded away the best dman we've ever had for a 1st and Granlund. Hoffman or Rutta are not playing great. Granlund has exceeded my expectations.

The Thrun move was a good move. Addison, meh.

I still think Zet is playing above who he is.

I'd rather have Lekkerimaki or Nazar. I did at the time too of that 2022 draft. I know it's hindsight for that 2nd round, but it looks like there were FAR BETTER kids in that round we passed on.

All I see on this website is people saying he's killing it and nothing convinces me he is so far. In fact, he's made bad big moves and a couple of okay little ones. I think I'm the only Grier hater on here tbh.
I'd be happy to eat crow, but I don't see it coming to my table just yet.
Jan. 10 at 11:30 a.m.
#15
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 872
Quoting: goodfella
Burns wasn't playing poorly, the whole team was. The return for him with that retention was garbage.
EK was a terrible return. We took on cap dumps and traded away the best dman we've ever had for a 1st and Granlund. Hoffman or Rutta are not playing great. Granlund has exceeded my expectations.

The Thrun move was a good move. Addison, meh.

I still think Zet is playing above who he is.

I'd rather have Lekkerimaki or Nazar. I did at the time too of that 2022 draft. I know it's hindsight for that 2nd round, but it looks like there were FAR BETTER kids in that round we passed on.

All I see on this website is people saying he's killing it and nothing convinces me he is so far. In fact, he's made bad big moves and a couple of okay little ones. I think I'm the only Grier hater on here tbh.
I'd be happy to eat crow, but I don't see it coming to my table just yet.


It's very clear you're looking for reasons not to like him so it's not even worth continuing
Jan. 10 at 1:03 p.m.
#16
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 927
Quoting: AStovetop
It's very clear you're looking for reasons not to like him so it's not even worth continuing


I was critical and praised him just in the last post.

Fair enough though. See you around the site.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll